It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wildtimes
The diff is that the top toppiest toppers are paying NOTHING, because they have off-shore accounts, foreign "income" bases, and numerous other "non-taxed" things like (if I remember correctly from NPR) capital gains.
You bring up a good question...if the top .01 percent pay no taxes and the bottom 47% also do not pay any taxes what is the difference? Raising taxes, as Obama wants to do without changing how we figure taxes will still not touch the ones that use the loop holes to their benefit. BTW using loop holes is not a bad or evil thing to do. Raising taxes will only affect those who really should not have their taxes raised in the first place.
Originally posted by wildtimes
while neglecting the dignity and standard of living of the people actually doing the work, and producing the profits. Why are they not entitled to a respectable and healthy share of the profits, but the "stock-holders" are??
Originally posted by TheCoolKids
-SCOTUS does not uphold amendments, amendments are ratified by the Congress and state legislatures. If an amendment passes this process SCOTUS can't strike it down. It further took an amendment to give women the vote, not a court case.
Originally posted by TheCoolKids
-How is discriminating on tax, racist and sexist? Classist yes, but I don't think the dependent class should vote.
Originally posted by TheCoolKids
-I prefer a government that isn't socialist over your skewed "republic" You favor the idea that some can legally steal from others, that is wrong.
Originally posted by TheCoolKids
-What you describe is charity, not what should be the role of government
Originally posted by TheCoolKids
-You don't care about the 1st Amendment rights of people in business but are happy to endorse rights not mentioned in the Constitution
Originally posted by TheCoolKids
-The Chinese economy is in a slowdown, if it was more free market like ROC-Taiwan and South Korea they would be far richer.
Originally posted by TheCoolKids
-The purpose of the government is to prevent tyranny of the majority, not the other way around
Originally posted by TheCoolKids
-You give the rich too much credit, unless the eleceytions are all fraudulent (which given your left wing statements about "poll taxes" means you presumably don't like Voter ID) the people voted in the current governments. If they were too lazy to do research prior to voting, then they reap what they sow.
Originally posted by TheCoolKids
-Im from Ohio and I remember how Voinovich poisoned pilled the original tax cuts back in 2001, I want them renewed indefinitely barring full reform of the system.
The Government we have right now wants to put the blame on the private sector (as in workers are not being paid enough) even when the problems are mostly staring us right in the face with an out of control Government.
We get into hyper inflation like Germany was before WWII and a wheel barrow of money might get you a loaf of bread, so just think of a America with a much smaller Federal Government and a fair tax system that benefits all, wouldn't that be nice, but it all starts and ends with the Government.
Why should the rich pay more taxes?
Originally posted by sligtlyskeptical
It is because people don't get rich without riding the backs of others. I think profits made on the backs of other people should be taxed higher than profits made through one's own sweat.
Originally posted by neoholographic
Can you blame Steve Jobs (R.I.P.) for being rich because people line up around the world to buy iPhones and iPads?
Can you blame Mark Cuban for being rich because Yahoo acquired Broadcast.com for 5.9 billion?
This class warfare nonsense needs to stop.
Originally posted by TheCoolKids
reply to post by watcher3339
The Brotherhood is killing Copts as we speak in Egypt, if we don't call them on the carpet NOW it will be genocide.
Originally posted by TheCoolKids
reply to post by Hefficide
Why not start taxing the 47% not paying income tax and ending the waste of the welfare system?
The tax cuts are only temporary because George Voinovich inserted the language as a poison pill back in 2001.
They should have always been permanent as Bush campaigned on.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by wildtimes
Who do you think you are? Who are you to arbitrarily decide how much is 'too much' and how much someone should be able to earn or keep? A salary cap? A savings cap? A property cap? :shk:
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Why should the rich pay more taxes?
Answer - they shouldn't have to. Not at all.
- EVERYONE should pay the same percentage no matter how much or little they make. That's the only 'fair tax' .. the only way that everyone will be 'paying their fair share'.
- Looting from those who have earned more is nothing more than stealing. It's jealousy in the extreme and, saying that it's okay to rob successful people simply because they are more successful is using excuses for theft because of that jealousy.
- Get spending under control and no one would have to pay nearly as much as they do now in taxes. Reign in government handouts .. entitlements .. union payoffs .. bailouts .. etc etc etc ...
- People deserve to keep what they earn. If they earn more .. it's THEIRS. You have no right to it.
- This 'soak the rich' bull is nothing more than class warfare .. it's looting .. it's stealing ... it's WRONG.
Thats the truth. Something that cheerleaders in class warfare don't like to face.