It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Using law for something other than it's intended purpose is corrupt but we could argue back and forth about definitions that so I'll leave it there.
From Jargonaut's post (what I've been replying to)
The whole thing is so blatantly in our faces corrupt on the part of the US gov it's an insult and so spineless on the part of the UK gov it's embarrassing.
The law is the law and the fact it IS being followed is the opposite of corruption. I don't like it, but that isn't the question.
No doubt there are some UK gov officials somewhere that were not pleased by some leaks as are those of many countries but the UK aren't seeking to acquire him for any investigation related to them. If the UK wanted to take issue with him they've had plenty of opportunity.
It also mentions Coercion for the United Kingdom?? How would that play into anything? Assange's releases burned U.K. secrets as well as the U.S. and those who followed Wiki-leaks well before it became a household name know he was an equal opportunity 'reporter'. ....the UK almost certainly has their own hard feelings and no warm concerns toward what ultimately happens to Assange.
Originally posted by drbatstein
So many people here who should know better are falling for this Assange false flag; he's a Rothschild, all is not as it seems!
Not even the Chinese government tried to enter the US Embassy to arrest the Chinese dissident Chen Guangchen. Even during the decades of the Cold War, defectors or dissidents were never seized from each other’s embassies.
Originally posted by drbatstein
So many people here who should know better are falling for this Assange false flag; he's a Rothschild, all is not as it seems!
Ecuador’s anti-American stance.
But why did Assange choose Ecuador of all countries? The fugitive probably remembered that its leftist government had briefly offered him residency in 2010 at the height of the WikiLeaks furore, though it later backed off. A stronger argument, though, is the strong anti-American stance of the Ecuadorean government, according to Jean-Jacques Kourliandsky, a Latin America specialist at France’s Insitute of International and Strategic Relations (IRIS). “[Assange] turned to the only embassy that will not hand him over to the US, the one most resistant to US pressure” he told FRANCE 24. “He could not seek refuge at the embassies of Mexico or Colombia, for example, since the former is a member of [free-trade bloc] NAFTA and the latter a strong ally of the US. Either one would have handed him over to the US within days.” Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa has also made a name for himself as a vocal critic of the powerful, including the American government and oil companies. “Correa is still rankled by the Chevron case [the US-based oil company refuses to pay a multibillion-dollar fine to clean up contamination from drilling and production in the Amazon jungle],” Jean-Jacques Kourliandsky added. “Ecuador is also a member of the Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas (known by its Spanish acronym ALBA), a group of Latin-American states very critical of US presence in the region. Two months ago, Quito even refused to attend the Summit of the Americas in Colombia because Cuba had not been invited.” Ecuador was also the only country to expel a diplomat as a result of allegations made by WikiLeaks. US ambassador Heather Hodges was asked to leave Quito in April 2011 after the whistle-blowing website released a US diplomatic cable alleging police corruption in Ecuador. Diplomatic relations have since been restored.
Originally posted by jhn7537
reply to post by Soulece
To be fair, he is a criminal, most hackers are criminals, they steal information and break into private/secure networks... Not sure how he isnt a criminal
Originally posted by blueflash
It does seem like the Australian govt is just turning their back and ignoring the situation.
Originally posted by djyorkie
Originally posted by drbatstein
So many people here who should know better are falling for this Assange false flag; he's a Rothschild, all is not as it seems!
I have missed that piece of evidence somewhere along the line.
Could you please link me to the proof.
Thanks
Originally posted by jhn7537
To be fair, he is a criminal, most hackers are criminals, they steal information and break into private/secure networks... Not sure how he isnt a criminal
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by moniker
I didn't say I liked what the US was doing or that I really think it's right ethically or just in any sense of fairness as we're constantly saying we're all about in public.
The question was simply DO they have a claim. Yes. The United States absolutely has a valid claim and under international law and treaty, on a strictly factual basis, they absolutely DO have the right to pursue anyone guilty of American violations of law........to the extent the host nation permits or agrees to it.
Originally posted by djyorkie
reply to post by drbatstein
Sorru, but sitting through that 5 mmin video, with too much info is beyond me.
I prefer to go and read evidence from reliable sources, rather than have info pushed at me through an unknown video.
From what I can tell, because he used a big law firm that has worked with a rothschild firm, and because some rothschild cinnected person posted his bail, that makes it that he has an ulterior motive?
If thats the case, there are too many flaws for me.
1. Regarding the bail... Couldnt anyone who chose to help him have done that? What if some israeli had posted that.. Would that have made him a leader in the zionist movement?
2. Regarding the law firm. If you choose to use a certain law firm, do you examine every one of their clients? Or do you use them because they are good?? If its a good law firm, you can guarantee that some shady people have also used them.
even if he does have a rothschild connection, does that mean he has the same agenda?
I am sure that there will be blood relatives around if hitler... I dont see loads of hitler family popping up to take over the world.
I guess I will have to look and find 100% evidence of rothschild agenda, and 100% evidence that assange is working for that agenda. If it isnt 100% proof, then its purely speculative and hear-say.
Guess I will have to go off and find this for myself.