It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by fireyaguns
Some friends of mine had a perfectly healthy baby boy back in 2010. They decided after enough pressure from their family members to immunise their baby and within 24 hours after their boy received the first shot their little boy reacted so badly he was taken back to the hospital and is now autistic.
If you don’t know your rights you have none.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by Thunder heart woman
I know a couple of parents that allowed their child to be put on a pediatric dose of xanax so that the child will stay seated and not "disrupt" the class. I don't know the entire story, but apparently the child was asking too many questions of the teacher and "disrupting" the rest of the students.
My decision to home school came about when my sister found out her son's teacher was high all of the time in class. The teacher was caught and fired, however, who is to say it can't happen again.
That infuriates me ....then it makes me sick.
The child was too intelligent and asked too many questions. Solution? Dope that kid until the proper level of dull stupidity is shown to conform.
Oh I could scream. People wonder why the United States ranks WAYY down on most Academic measures within the Western World. At one time we led the world. Now? We tell each other we still do.....while I swear, the world kinda chuckles at hearing us say it.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by marg6043
I don't know why it is happening. But if that lady would have had a way to contact me, I would have started driving that way with my guns.
I hold my children as the most sacred thing in the world. I would kill for mine, and I would kill for yours, too.
Originally posted by Starchildren
A meeting was held in which the counselor suggested that her daughter had some type of mental problem that needed to be addressed, and the topic of medication was introduced. Medication so that her daughter would sit still.
Originally posted by snarky412
reply to post by martianmallow
Me personally, I am so sick and tired of hearing doctors prescribing medicine to young kids. What ever happened to trying to treat a problem on it's own, with out medicine? This wasn't always like this, there used to be doctors who actually took the time to diagnose & treat properly with out the use of meds.
Originally posted by ninjas4321
So a swat team came to a womans house with a tank all because she refused to give her child her prescribed meds
Only in america and yes she eventuly got the right to decide whats best for her childedit on 29-7-2012 by ninjas4321 because: (no reason given)
Anyway, she went to see this specialist. So, this oak-paneled room, and she was there with her mother, and she was led and sat on this chair at the end, and she sat on her hands for 20 minutes while this man talked to her mother about all the problems Gillian was having at school. And at the end of it -- because she was disturbing people; her homework was always late; and so on, little kid of eight -- in the end, the doctor went and sat next to Gillian and said, "Gillian, I've listened to all these things that your mother's told me, and I need to speak to her privately." He said, "Wait here. We'll be back; we won't be very long," and they went and left her. But as they went out the room, he turned on the radio that was sitting on his desk. And when they got out the room, he said to her mother, "Just stand and watch her." And the minute they left the room, she said, she was on her feet, moving to the music. And they watched for a few minutes and he turned to her mother and said, "Mrs. Lynne, Gillian isn't sick; she's a dancer. Take her to a dance school."
Originally posted by EvilSadamClone
The sad thing is, these idiots think they're just helping the children. This is why I'm so much against Children Firsters, is because they think they have more rights to your children than you do and can do anything they want to in order to protect your children.
That's also why I hate self righteous people, they always think they're justified and always think they're doing no wrong and always take it upon themselves to act on their convictions without fully understanding or educating themselves of the situation.
Now I believe in protecting children, and am against child abuse and all that, but I draw the line at idiocy and the trampling of a person's rights.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by marg6043
I don't know why it is happening. But if that lady would have had a way to contact me, I would have started driving that way with my guns.
I hold my children as the most sacred thing in the world. I would kill for mine, and I would kill for yours, too.
Originally posted by Shoujikina
Originally posted by ninjas4321
So a swat team came to a womans house with a tank all because she refused to give her child her prescribed meds
Only in america and yes she eventuly got the right to decide whats best for her childedit on 29-7-2012 by ninjas4321 because: (no reason given)
It's not only in America. It's the same everywhere, because..
You can't REGISTER your child and then expect to be able to dictate what gets/doesn't get put inside of his/her body any more than you can dictate whether she/he will enter a government school or not, or what they will teach him/her there.
Don't register your children, if you don't want the government (REGIS = KING) to own them. It's as simple as that. You willingly gave away all control to your child ('allodial title' belongs to the government from that point on), and then you are surprised when the government has the authority to do whatever they want with the kid.
There's a certain amount of hypocrisy in that. It's like I sign a contract with you, which allows you to hit my head with a wooden hammer, and when you do, I start being shocked about it and complain all over the place. Well, duh - what did you expect?edit on 30-7-2012 by Shoujikina because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by WorkingClassMan
What is the standard police response when a child is being removed from a home, and an adult then baricades themself inside the house with said child? (I'm assumeing their is a standard)
Here is the standard, beginning with Article I, Section 1 of the Michigan State Constitution
§ 1 Political power.
Sec. 1. All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for their equal benefit, security and protection.
Article I, Section 17:
§ 17 Self-incrimination; due process of law; fair treatment at investigations.
Sec. 17. No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law. The right of all individuals, firms, corporations and voluntary associations to fair and just treatment in the course of legislative and executive investigations and hearings shall not be infringed.
Most importantly, Article I, Section 23:
§ 23 Enumeration of rights not to deny others.
Sec. 23. The enumeration in this constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The governments in Michigan were way out of control before SWAT showed up, and I might add that SWAT personnel are trained to kill. Trained to shoot and kill. Shoot and kill.
Legal experts: 'Rubber-stamping' child removal orders illegal; Wayne County practice must stop
(WXYZ) - When the judge dismissed the criminal charges against Maryanne Godboldo – he called the child removal order that sparked the case unconstitutional. As the Action News Investigators first showed you – the order to remove Godboldo’s child from her home was never actually reviewed by a judge.
This process is called rubber-stamping – where probation officers - NOT judges -- are literally stamping a judge’s signature onto the orders used to take children away from their parents. That means in Wayne County -- a judge is not looking at the evidence in a case before a child is removed – and court experts say that’s illegal – and it has got to stop.
Would you call "rubber stamping" due process of law, or would you call that standard operating procedure for Constitutionally restrained governments?
Pick up that gauntlet and do some homework. Ignorantia juris non excusat!