It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
reply to post by resoe26
How bout we not choose Obama or Romney...
There was a time when that was possible. But it doesn't appear to be possible any more. The American people have shown how truly blind they are and it's too late to turn back now.
Originally posted by UKTruth
In an interview in the US Romney talked of how he worries about the security and public service strikes in the UK that could hurt the Olympics, doubting the Games' success. He turns up in Britain, stands outside Downing Street and declares how impressed he is with the organisation and how we in England are set up for a great Games.
The English media certainly picked up on it, portraying him as a complete buffoon - rightly so.
I am still astounded that the American people could let this man anywhere near an office of Government. Shocking.
Originally posted by PvtHudson
Originally posted by UKTruth
In an interview in the US Romney talked of how he worries about the security and public service strikes in the UK that could hurt the Olympics, doubting the Games' success. He turns up in Britain, stands outside Downing Street and declares how impressed he is with the organisation and how we in England are set up for a great Games.
The English media certainly picked up on it, portraying him as a complete buffoon - rightly so.
I am still astounded that the American people could let this man anywhere near an office of Government. Shocking.
Sooo, why didn't the UK press get as outraged when Michelle hugged the queen ( he spoke over the playing of God Save the Queen amid embarrassing silence)? Or when Obama toasted the queen? Or when Obama referred to the Falkland Islands as the Maldives? Or when Obama claimed Austrian is a language? There seems to be quite selective outrage based on what party you're in.
Originally posted by PvtHudson
Originally posted by UKTruth
In an interview in the US Romney talked of how he worries about the security and public service strikes in the UK that could hurt the Olympics, doubting the Games' success. He turns up in Britain, stands outside Downing Street and declares how impressed he is with the organisation and how we in England are set up for a great Games.
The English media certainly picked up on it, portraying him as a complete buffoon - rightly so.
I am still astounded that the American people could let this man anywhere near an office of Government. Shocking.
Sooo, why didn't the UK press get as outraged when Michelle hugged the queen ( he spoke over the playing of God Save the Queen amid embarrassing silence)? Or when Obama toasted the queen? Or when Obama referred to the Falkland Islands as the Maldives? Or when Obama claimed Austrian is a language? There seems to be quite selective outrage based on what party you're in.
Originally posted by UKTruth
I am still astounded that the American people could let this man anywhere near an office of Government. Shocking.
Originally posted by UKTruth
I am still astounded that the American people could let this man anywhere near an office of Government. Shocking.
Originally posted by PvtHudson
Originally posted by UKTruth
In an interview in the US Romney talked of how he worries about the security and public service strikes in the UK that could hurt the Olympics, doubting the Games' success. He turns up in Britain, stands outside Downing Street and declares how impressed he is with the organisation and how we in England are set up for a great Games.
The English media certainly picked up on it, portraying him as a complete buffoon - rightly so.
I am still astounded that the American people could let this man anywhere near an office of Government. Shocking.
Sooo, why didn't the UK press get as outraged when Michelle hugged the queen ( he spoke over the playing of God Save the Queen amid embarrassing silence)? Or when Obama toasted the queen? Or when Obama referred to the Falkland Islands as the Maldives? Or when Obama claimed Austrian is a language? There seems to be quite selective outrage based on what party you're in.
Originally posted by Thunda
Well, speaking as a Brit, I think he came over as a complete tool yesterday.
As someone has already pointed out, the BBC news- the most watched news channel in the UK- is biased to the right,
Originally posted by UKTruth
In an interview in the US Romney talked of how he worries about the security and public service strikes in the UK that could hurt the Olympics, doubting the Games' success. He turns up in Britain, stands outside Downing Street and declares how impressed he is with the organisation and how we in England are set up for a great Games.
The English media certainly picked up on it, portraying him as a complete buffoon - rightly so.
I am still astounded that the American people could let this man anywhere near an office of Government. Shocking.
Originally posted by tide88
Either way, flip flopping on the issue of the Olympics hardly should be a concern or cause someone not to vote for Romney.
and why didn't Republicans protest the out of control government spending for the last decade,
the expansion of government, the signing of the patriot act, domestic spying previous czar appointments, previous NDAA, Fast and Furious when Bush started the program and a whole list of constitutional
infractions?
Selective outrage based upon what party you're in.
If you slacked off and shined it on then, you are a larded hypocrite now, only you know the
truth.edit on 27-7-2012 by pisssss because: (no reason given)
First off, Bush had nothing to do with Fast and Furious and he didn't start it. There was an operation called Wide Receiver, but it wasn't anything like Fast and Furious. Here is a article on the differences, which are quite large.
Wide Reciever vs Fast and Furious
As for the other comments, all necessary due to 9/11 and fighting two wars.edit on 27-7-2012 by tide88 because: (no reason given)edit on 27-7-2012 by tide88 because: (no reason given)extra DIV
Originally posted by pisssss
Originally posted by tide88
Either way, flip flopping on the issue of the Olympics hardly should be a concern or cause someone not to vote for Romney.
I agree
The fact that he flip flops on literally EVERY issue should be a cause and concern not to vote
for Romney.
Originally posted by JailTales
You would think that republicans despise everything about Britain, but maybe they still think it's 200 years ago and we're a fascist dictatorship that wants to rule the world
Originally posted by Thunda
I really hope Romneys aides realise what an arse he made of himself with this- these were exactly the sort of foreigners he should have been getting on with- Conservatives white English speakers. Cant imagine how he would fair with the French, Germans, Italians never mind Asian or African nations.
Originally posted by LifeInDeath
Originally posted by JailTales
You would think that republicans despise everything about Britain, but maybe they still think it's 200 years ago and we're a fascist dictatorship that wants to rule the world
No, they think the London Blitz is still going on and have romantic ideas about Churchill getting on the radio every night and rallying the valiant British people to victory over the Nazis.
Seriously, I think that's the image of the current U.K. they have locked in their collective minds.
“We are part of an Anglo-Saxon heritage, and he feels that the special relationship is special. The White House didn’t fully appreciate the shared history we have”. - Romney Campaign
Mitt Romney would restore "Anglo-Saxon" understanding to the special relationship between the US and Britain, and return Sir Winston Churchill's bust to the White House, according to advisers.