It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio is being forced to respond to his critics this week as a civil trial is underway in federal court accusing the lawman of discriminatory behavior and civil rights violations. Arpaio, who has publicly denied promoting any wrongdoing as a public official, is the target of a class action lawsuit, in which plaintiffs will present a bevy of evidence that the Sheriff used his official position to systematically target Latinos for unnecessary questioning and detention.
As the trial began on Thursday, lawyers for the plaintiffs began their case by presenting as evidence a series of racially charged letters received by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s office, where various members of the public complained about places where they observed Spanish speakers in the community or individuals with “the look of Mexican illegals.”
Originally posted by NeoVain
reply to post by Classified Info
This is just a cheap attempt to "shoot the messenger" and divert attentiion from his latest findings in his investigation about Obama, no doubt this is manipulated by the Obama administration to the highest degree.
This is just a cheap attempt to "shoot the messenger" and divert attentiion from his latest findings in his investigation about Obama, no doubt this is manipulated by the Obama administration to the highest degree.
Originally posted by Doalrite
Critics to this man need to go live on the border and have there homes over ridden with illegals.
Maricopa County law enforcement violated the constitutional rights of this newspapers readers in October. Using secret grand jury subpoenas, County Attorney Andrew Thomas sought records that would reveal the identity of anyone who looked at New Times online in the past four years. When the papers leaders revealed the grand jury probe in a cover story, sheriffs deputies arrested them.
Originally posted by Taupin Desciple
reply to post by Classified Info
I personally feel that if you don't live in Arizona, or know someone who does who can re-count first hand what's going on, you shouldn't be entitled to voice your opinion about Joe Arpaio because you simply don't know what you're talking about.
Reading about what's going on in Arizona and living with it are two different animals.
I personally feel that if you don't live in Arizona, or know someone who does who can re-count first hand what's going on, you shouldn't be entitled to voice your opinion about Joe Arpaio because you simply don't know what you're talking about.
Federal Judge Neil V. Wake ruled in 2008, and again in 2010, that the Maricopa County jails violated the constitutional rights of inmates in medical and other care related issues.[25][26] This ruling was a result of a lawsuit brought by the ACLU, which alleged that "Arpaio routinely abused pre-trial detainees at Maricopa County Jail by feeding them moldy bread, rotten fruit and other contaminated food, housing them in cells so hot as to endanger their health, denying them care for serious medical and mental health needs and keeping them packed as tightly as sardines in holding cells for days at a time during intake."[48]
An analysis by the Maricopa County Office of Management and Budget, completed in April 2011, found Arpaio had misspent almost $100 million over the previous 5 years.[85][86][87]
The analysis showed that money from a restricted detention fund which could only legally be used to pay for jail items, such as food, detention officers' salaries and equipment, was used to pay employees to patrol Maricopa County.[85] The analysis also showed that many Sheriff's Office employees, whose salaries were paid from the restricted detention fund, were working job assignments different from those recorded in their personnel records. Arpaio's office kept a separate set of personnel books detailing actual work assignments, different from information kept on the county's official human-resources records.[86]
The analysis also showed a number of inappropriate spending items, including a trip to Alaska where deputies stayed at a fishing resort, and trips to Disneyland.[86][88]
The Republic also found that a restricted jail enhancement fund was improperly used to pay for out-of-state training, a staff party at a local amusement park, and a $456,000 bus, which was purchased by Arpaio in violation of county procurement rules.[85][90]