This video is listed on the NAGR page.
Why does the NAGR want to keep this video private?
I would ask the NRA, gun confiscation cannot and will not happen in the US.
How can someone take something from you that they have no right to?
I smell fearmongering somewhere, can't put my finger on it though...
Uhhh the last time I check "Disarmament" mean taking away arms.
The goal of the UN disarmament is to allow only the chosen people, ie. Governments, to have small arms.
With our second amendment we are a threat to world government. They cannot impose their will on an armed populace quite as easily as the can an
unarmed one. Wouldn't you agree?
This Arms Trade Treaty stands in direct conflict with our Second Amendment, which is: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a
free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
The Militia is not the military. It is we the people that are not part of the military. We the people were given the right to keep and bear arms to
deter invasions, assist the government in quelling uprisings, and lastly a means to defend ourselves against a tyrannical government.
Our private ownership of firearms for the most part keeps tyranny in check.
yea that is pretty crazy what happened the other night, I'm sure people will be talking about gun control a lot more from now on. Still taking law
abiding citizens guns away will not solve the problem. Of course i don't want that to happen but at the same time I'm not too worried.
I am really sure that Russia and China some of the largest arms suppliers in the world are going to abid by that "Treaty".
There has not been a conflict in the last 6 decades there has been an ak-47 behind "freedom fighter" and "dictator" alike, between "terrorist"
and "whoever" a like.
The goal of the small arms treaty is to disarm the world so that people can't fight back but it is also a progressive agenda to disarm the people
here so that goverment can't roll over them like a jdam.
As the Founding Fathers knew well, a government that does not trust its honest, law-abiding, taxpaying citizens with the means of self-defense is not
itself worthy of trust. Laws disarming honest citizens proclaim that the government is the master, not the servant, of the people.
-- Jeff Snyder
But it is not only the US government is that charade it is the UN an entity that has no power over the American citizen.
The UN small arms treaty is like what we currently have the cops are better armed, the military is better armed and there is the average law abiding
citizen caught in the middle whose only means of self defense is apparently harsh words.
Our Senate would still have to ratify legislation accepting the UN Treaty, the way I understand it. The O admin knows that if they can't get it
ratified before elections, it's not going to happen for a while.
The Obama administration’s push for Senate ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) in 2012 appears to have been stymied by Republican
opposition. According to the Daily Caller, 34 Republican Senators have now stated that they will not vote to ratify the treaty, which gives the United
Nations control over 70 percent of the Earth’s surface. Therefore, if the treaty is brought up for a vote before the full Senate and all those now
opposing it remain steadfast, it will be defeated.
The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.
All content copyright 2013, The Above Network, LLC.