9/11 Intercepted

page: 4
10
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 10:59 AM
link   
9/11 MADNESS
post removed because of personal attacks

Click here to learn more about this warning.




posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 11:01 AM
link   
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 11:06 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 11:12 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 11:15 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 11:21 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 11:28 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 11:34 AM
link   
9/11 MADNESS
post removed because of personal attacks

Click here to learn more about this warning.



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 11:36 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 11:37 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 11:41 AM
link   
9/11 MADNESS
post removed because of personal attacks

Click here to learn more about this warning.



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 11:44 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 11:49 AM
link   
9/11 MADNESS
post removed because of personal attacks

Click here to learn more about this warning.



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 11:53 AM
link   
@hooper

"the skies were cleared" was in reference to any craft which may have stopped the supposed "attacks"

And nobody said that they expected "100% cover" but something other than an hour's worth of digit in rectum at the very least. Who do you think you're deluding here? Apart from yourself.

Here's an example of how fighter pilots were totally disorientated, obstructed and fed wrong information. Or as you would call it. "Protocol"

shoestring911.blogspot.com.es...



Brad Derrig described the confusion--what he called "the smoke of war"--over what was happening that morning, saying, "No one knew exactly what was going on." [42] Craig Borgstrom said that, as the crisis unfolded, he "had no idea" the Pentagon and World Trade Center had been struck by suicide terrorists in airplanes. Describing the growing confusion, he said, "It was a mess." [43] Borgstrom has said it was only when he caught sight of the burning Pentagon that he started thinking, "OK, maybe there's some type of attack going on," adding, "You start correlating Washington, DC, with New York." [44] When Dean Eckmann saw the Pentagon, he actually thought the Russians had attacked it. He told the 9/11 Commission: "I reverted to the Russian threat. ... I'm thinking cruise missile threat from the sea. You know, you look down and see the Pentagon burning, and I thought the bastards snuck one by us. ... No one told us anything." [45] Eckmann and Derrig had even thought that they were headed to New York rather than Washington. Craig Borgstrom described: "The other two guys I was flying with initially thought that we were going to New York because they knew the Trade Center had been hit and they'd seen the smoke. ... I was more familiar with the area and knew we were going more toward DC." But, he recalled, as they approached Washington, "We still have not been intel briefed as to what's going on." [46]

At that time, according to Lynn Spencer, when Brad Derrig "looks up to see smoke on the horizon in front of him, he assumes that he is looking at New York. He had heard about an aircraft hitting the World Trade Center just before they were scrambled, and with all the changes in coordinates they've been given, he has no idea that he's looking at Washington." [47] Furthermore, it was only when the jets returned to base, after being airborne for over four hours, that the three pilots learned about Flight 93--the fourth hijacked plane, which supposedly crashed into a field in rural Pennsylvania. [48]

OTHER PROBLEMS

We have seen that there were numerous ways in which the Langley jets were hindered on 9/11: the delay while they were on the runway and the problems that occurred because the alert unit's supervisor of flying took off in a spare fighter; the fact that the F-16s flew east over the ocean, instead of going north as NEADS had instructed; the inexplicable indifference of the Navy controllers who were handling the jets while they were over the ocean; NEADS's repeated inability to contact the pilots directly; the jumbled communications the pilots were receiving over their radios; and the fact that the pilots were not informed about what was going on or what their exact mission was. There is evidence of additional problems that further impeded the Langley F-16s that morning. Lynn Spencer described two notable incidents. After the pilots had initially been misdirected over the ocean, NEADS weapons director Steve Citino forwarded coordinates to them, telling them to establish a combat air patrol over Washington. However, Citino apparently gave out the wrong coordinates. According to Spencer, "He inadvertently transposed two of the coordinates, and the F-16s turned onto a flight path that would take them 60 miles southwest of Washington." When he noticed the jets heading the wrong way, Citino had to contact them again to get them on the correct course. [49] And after receiving the incorrect coordinates, lead pilot Dean Eckmann had a problem with his aircraft. The bearing pointer on its horizontal situation indicator, which shows a plane's position relative to its intended destination, froze, so he had to get the heading from one of the other pilots. [50] These incidents are only what have been described in the publicly-available accounts. It seems reasonable to assume the jets experienced other complications that have so far gone unreported. A thorough and unrestrained investigation of the 9/11 attacks is imperative in order to reveal such problems, find out why the Langley F-16s were so badly obstructed in carrying out what should have been a routine emergency response, and uncover who was responsible for this.



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 12:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by thegameisup
 



You never complain about all the revenue the media/new channels made on 9/11 from adverts...

Actually, most lost a great deal of money because the coverage was not interupted and advertsising revenue was lost. Don't forget - you only pay for adverts if they are broadcast.


So all the OS documentaries that have been shown on TV since were all uninterupted and without adverts? Pull the other one!

Also, I've seen programs like Today that were reporting 9/11 on the day and they broke to have adverts!
Programs like these are archived on YT.

Seriously, you need to practice what you preach, and it's very very obvious why you want to discredit anything about anyone who does not believe the OS. Keep to the facts of 9/11, nothing else.

Speaking of facts, and in keeping with the topic of the thread, because you OS'ers seem to have deliberately tried to steer the OP topic away from it's core objective (as usual), can you tell me this....

WHY WERE THE PLANES SEEN ON RADAR AFTER THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO HAVE CRASHED???



edit on 20-7-2012 by thegameisup because: spelling



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 12:03 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 12:07 PM
link   
9/11 MADNESS
post removed because of personal attacks

Click here to learn more about this warning.



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 12:14 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 12:25 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 20 2012 @ 12:36 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 





top topics
 
10
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join