9/11 Solved!

reply to post by ColoradoJens

Page 1 of this thread. So, fail.

How can a question be a fail?

reply to post by ColoradoJens


It is clear that you are here to do anything but actually discuss the disputed material so I think I am about done with you buddy.

Originally posted by TraitorKiller
reply to post by ColoradoJens

 

Page 1 of this thread. So, fail.

How can a question be a fail?

Btw, did you wait to mention those people at a later time in this discussion because you forgot about them earlier? You didn't mention them before did you?

I showed you this fact was mentioned on page one of this thread. Read your question. Do you not understand what you yourself wrote? This is awesome.

CJ

Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by TraitorKiller

 

Again, yes. It is a disgrace to make the claims you are making, and it's kind of funny in a sad way to see you continue to post these outrageous examples. Can you repost your example of the guy diving in the japanese game show to compare to the "jumper"? That was as good as they come. You are the one supposedly giving evidence of your theory.

Thus far you admit:

1) You have no knowledge of photography.
2) You have no knowledge of videography.
3) You have no firsthand knowledge of the WTC or NY in general
4) Your sources are septemberclues and the let'sroll forum.

I think that sums it up.

CJ

Originally posted by TraitorKiller
reply to post by ColoradoJens

 

It is clear that you are here to do anything but actually discuss the disputed material so I think I am about done with you buddy.

It isn't disputed. You are wrong.

CJ

reply to post by ColoradoJens

It isn't disputed. You are wrong.

Why am I wrong? Are you saying the perspectives are realistic?

I showed you this fact was mentioned on page one of this thread. Read your question. Do you not understand what you yourself wrote? This is awesome.

I asked you a question, then you answered and said "fail".

reply to post by TraitorKiller


No I'm saying it isn't disputed. You are wrong and something like 4 people agree with you. Cozy club.

CJ

Originally posted by TraitorKiller
reply to post by ColoradoJens

 

It isn't disputed. You are wrong.

Why am I wrong? Are you saying the perspectives are realistic?

I showed you this fact was mentioned on page one of this thread. Read your question. Do you not understand what you yourself wrote? This is awesome.

I asked you a question, then you answered and said "fail".

edit on 14-7-2012 by TraitorKiller because: (no reason given)

YOUR QUOTE:

You didn't mention them before did you?

I mentioned it before. FAIL.

CJ

reply to post by ColoradoJens


So...I am wrong...because I'm wrong....and because of popular view.....

Great argumentation.

Jens, I couldn't have outed you any better than you did yourself buddy.

Take care now bye bye then.

reply to post by ColoradoJens


So did I say you didn't mention them before, or did I ask you if you didn't, Jens?

Originally posted by TraitorKiller
reply to post by ColoradoJens

 

So...I am wrong...because I'm wrong....and because of popular view.....

Great argumentation.

Jens, I couldn't have outed you any better than you did yourself buddy.

Take care now bye bye then.

No, keep on. This is excellent. You are wrong because you can't and don't want to take the time to actually understand what it is that you are looking at. Your examples are laughable at best and you have no knowledge of what it is you are looking at. It hurts, I know, but you are tough. I await your "analysis" on the latest bigfoot footage shot in N.C. Should be a barn burner.

CJ

Originally posted by TraitorKiller
reply to post by ColoradoJens

 

So did I say you didn't mention them before, or did I ask you if you didn't, Jens?

edit on 14-7-2012 by TraitorKiller because: (no reason given)

Hahhahahaha....you aren't an obvious shill, ARE YOU?

CJ

reply to post by ColoradoJens


Just playing your game buddy.

So I should pretend they didn't die? Ok. I'll selectively edit that fact out when discussing with you that no one died that die

Now, you should step up and say, "these are the people I mourn, they were my friends, we did things together".

I mean aren't their pictures not already online, aren't their identities not public information? Are their names not on the memorial wall?

Why renounce them?

reply to post by TraitorKiller


Darren Peel? Is that you? Perhaps Lawrence?



CJ

reply to post by TraitorKiller


Nope. Not my friends and I did nothing with them other than sell financial products to them.

CJ

reply to post by ColoradoJens


All I need,-- to see that a building that is a block away from the building where a street level picture is taken from, and at least 3 times higher, cannot appear in said pic, having the same visual height as the smaller building,-- is not to be a retard.

reply to post by ColoradoJens


Who were they and what companies did they work for?

reply to post by ColoradoJens

Darren Peel? Is that you? Perhaps Lawrence?

I'm sorry, i don't know this show nor these people. This is more for the fossilized crowd I guess. Neeto.

"When humor wasn't funny"

Great era.

Originally posted by TraitorKiller
reply to post by ColoradoJens

 

All I need,-- to see that a building that is a block away from the building where a street level picture is taken from, and at least 3 times higher, cannot appear in said pic, having the same visual height as the smaller building,-- is not to be a retard.

I think this is the second time you've said "retard". It's in very bad taste and frankly, as I am retarded, you have proven yourself to be on a lower level.

CJ

Originally posted by TraitorKiller
reply to post by ColoradoJens

 

Darren Peel? Is that you? Perhaps Lawrence?

I'm sorry, i don't know this show nor these people. This is more for the fossilized crowd I guess. Neeto.

"When humor wasn't funny"

Great era.

Hahahah. Definately "fossilized". I suppose reading James Joyce isn't your bag either. When writing wasn't good. Great Era.

CJ