9/11 Solved!

page: 16
3
<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 09:50 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 





Page 1 of this thread. So, fail.


How can a question be a fail?




posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 09:53 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


It is clear that you are here to do anything but actually discuss the disputed material so I think I am about done with you buddy.



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 09:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by TraitorKiller
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 





Page 1 of this thread. So, fail.


How can a question be a fail?



Btw, did you wait to mention those people at a later time in this discussion because you forgot about them earlier? You didn't mention them before did you?


I showed you this fact was mentioned on page one of this thread. Read your question. Do you not understand what you yourself wrote? This is awesome.

CJ



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 09:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by ColoradoJens
reply to post by TraitorKiller
 


Again, yes. It is a disgrace to make the claims you are making, and it's kind of funny in a sad way to see you continue to post these outrageous examples. Can you repost your example of the guy diving in the japanese game show to compare to the "jumper"? That was as good as they come. You are the one supposedly giving evidence of your theory.

Thus far you admit:

1) You have no knowledge of photography.
2) You have no knowledge of videography.
3) You have no firsthand knowledge of the WTC or NY in general
4) Your sources are septemberclues and the let'sroll forum.

I think that sums it up.

CJ



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 09:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by TraitorKiller
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


It is clear that you are here to do anything but actually discuss the disputed material so I think I am about done with you buddy.



It isn't disputed. You are wrong.

CJ



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 09:58 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 





It isn't disputed. You are wrong.


Why am I wrong? Are you saying the perspectives are realistic?




I showed you this fact was mentioned on page one of this thread. Read your question. Do you not understand what you yourself wrote? This is awesome.


I asked you a question, then you answered and said "fail".

edit on 14-7-2012 by TraitorKiller because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 10:01 PM
link   
reply to post by TraitorKiller
 


No I'm saying it isn't disputed. You are wrong and something like 4 people agree with you. Cozy club.

CJ



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 10:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by TraitorKiller
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 





It isn't disputed. You are wrong.


Why am I wrong? Are you saying the perspectives are realistic?




I showed you this fact was mentioned on page one of this thread. Read your question. Do you not understand what you yourself wrote? This is awesome.


I asked you a question, then you answered and said "fail".

edit on 14-7-2012 by TraitorKiller because: (no reason given)


YOUR QUOTE:


You didn't mention them before did you?


I mentioned it before. FAIL.

CJ
edit on 14-7-2012 by ColoradoJens because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 10:05 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


So...I am wrong...because I'm wrong....and because of popular view.....

Great argumentation.

Jens, I couldn't have outed you any better than you did yourself buddy.

Take care now bye bye then.



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 10:06 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


So did I say you didn't mention them before, or did I ask you if you didn't, Jens?
edit on 14-7-2012 by TraitorKiller because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 10:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by TraitorKiller
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


So...I am wrong...because I'm wrong....and because of popular view.....

Great argumentation.

Jens, I couldn't have outed you any better than you did yourself buddy.

Take care now bye bye then.


No, keep on. This is excellent. You are wrong because you can't and don't want to take the time to actually understand what it is that you are looking at. Your examples are laughable at best and you have no knowledge of what it is you are looking at. It hurts, I know, but you are tough. I await your "analysis" on the latest bigfoot footage shot in N.C. Should be a barn burner.

CJ



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 10:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by TraitorKiller
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


So did I say you didn't mention them before, or did I ask you if you didn't, Jens?
edit on 14-7-2012 by TraitorKiller because: (no reason given)


Hahhahahaha....you aren't an obvious shill, ARE YOU?

CJ



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 10:21 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


Just playing your game buddy.




So I should pretend they didn't die? Ok. I'll selectively edit that fact out when discussing with you that no one died that die


Now, you should step up and say, "these are the people I mourn, they were my friends, we did things together".

I mean aren't their pictures not already online, aren't their identities not public information? Are their names not on the memorial wall?

Why renounce them?



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 10:33 PM
link   
reply to post by TraitorKiller
 


Darren Peel? Is that you? Perhaps Lawrence?



CJ
edit on 14-7-2012 by ColoradoJens because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 10:34 PM
link   
reply to post by TraitorKiller
 


Nope. Not my friends and I did nothing with them other than sell financial products to them.

CJ



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 10:43 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


All I need,-- to see that a building that is a block away from the building where a street level picture is taken from, and at least 3 times higher, cannot appear in said pic, having the same visual height as the smaller building,-- is not to be a retard.



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 10:45 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


Who were they and what companies did they work for?



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 11:02 PM
link   
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 





Darren Peel? Is that you? Perhaps Lawrence?


I'm sorry, i don't know this show nor these people. This is more for the fossilized crowd I guess. Neeto.

"When humor wasn't funny"

Great era.



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 11:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by TraitorKiller
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 


All I need,-- to see that a building that is a block away from the building where a street level picture is taken from, and at least 3 times higher, cannot appear in said pic, having the same visual height as the smaller building,-- is not to be a retard.


I think this is the second time you've said "retard". It's in very bad taste and frankly, as I am retarded, you have proven yourself to be on a lower level.

CJ



posted on Jul, 14 2012 @ 11:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by TraitorKiller
reply to post by ColoradoJens
 





Darren Peel? Is that you? Perhaps Lawrence?


I'm sorry, i don't know this show nor these people. This is more for the fossilized crowd I guess. Neeto.

"When humor wasn't funny"

Great era.


Hahahah. Definately "fossilized". I suppose reading James Joyce isn't your bag either. When writing wasn't good. Great Era.

CJ
edit on 14-7-2012 by ColoradoJens because: (no reason given)





new topics
top topics
 
3
<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in

join