It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
then most would guess you know Nothing about the evolution of slavery, segregation or the plight of Homer Plessy which clearly emphasizes the power of One.
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
reply to post by sageofmonticello
well seeing as how the south enforced segregation and institutionalized racism well into the 60s exactly when do u think racism/slavery would have ended had the south won the war? yeah knowing a little bit about history helps?
at least in the South what racism one does encounter is obvious and in your face. Up North, racism is alive and well, just in the backwoods, behind the shed, in every place of public convergence (schoolyards, picinics, parks, bars, pot luck dinners)
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
and the racism lasted 100 years? to this day folks in the south are not the most racially tolerant if you catch my drift. no wonder there was a black diaspora to the northern states before during and after the civil war. no wonder a black teenager named emmit til was killed for whistling at a white woman nearly 100 years after the civil war. i guess them southerners really know how to hold a grudge.
where did you get this notion?
Originally posted by pierregustavetoutant
reply to post by conspiracy nut
Every Northerner who migrates South becomes the most vile of racists. Far far worse than Southern natives. They come down judging Southerners with all their prejudice, preconceived notions, and intolerant attitudes (see above post) and become intense racists within a year. Just something I've picked up on over the years.
Not sure why that phenomenon occurs.
Originally posted by Juggernog
Originally posted by habitforming
Originally posted by xstealth
First off, the biggest insult of all is them teaching it was the 'civil war'. It wasn't a civil war, IT WAS THE 2ND WAR OF INDEPENDENCE.
Ignorance prevails...
OK, lets start here. Who decides what it was called?
The victor writes history but that doesnt make it fact.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
The South stood for Liberty and extremely limited Federal intrusions.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
reply to post by habitforming
Are you willing to claim the North initially invaded the South to end slavery then?
Of course slavery was legal in all Southern states - it was a major reason for secession yet slave labor only benefited the upper 5% who owned them.
Most of the rest of the Southern people were fighting because they didn't like seeing their homes and farms burned and raided.
Funny how the other 95% don't matter to those who argue the South fought only to preserve slavery.
if that's true then why were the slave states of Maryland and New York fighting to abolish their own revenue source ??
Originally posted by habitforming
Originally posted by getreadyalready
The South stood for Liberty and extremely limited Federal intrusions.
Nothing says that louder than fighting to keep slavery legal.
Originally posted by Juggernog
The knee jerk, ignorant comments that some people make regarding the Old South are ridiculous. There seems to be a huge misconception that everyone in the South owned slaves.
Usually in these kinds of threads, when I tell people im from Texas, they automatically assume that my ancestors owned slaves.
When I tell them that one half of my family were sharecroppers and the other half came from Germany, they usually just say whatever or call me a liar.
A very small percentage of Southerners owned slaves, since slaves were very expensive, only large plantation owners or the otherwise very wealthy were the only ones that could afford them.
could you be a bit more specific with this question?
I will then ask you to cite one single state that did not cite slavery in their declaration.
Originally posted by SUICIDEHK45
Not surprisingly, Nugent – a firearms enthusiast, conservative and guitar rocker best known for hits such as “Cat Scratch Fever” – took aim at the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent 5-4 decision upholding the insurance mandate in the 2010 health care law and what he called Chief Justice John Roberts’ “traitor vote” siding with the court’s more liberal wing.
Nugent said the court’s decision “will ensure more monumental spending and wasted taxes …under one of the world’s most bureaucratic, ineffective, incompetent and grossly expensive systems ever devided by man: our out-of-control federal government.”
Cat Scratch Fever?
Ted does rant.But one point was correct,the civil war was not really about slavery.That was just the best banner to wave.
Slavery was and still is very wrong.If you look back in history.Every culture suffered it at one point Irish via british Jews via egypt Almost everyone in old world via Rome the list goes on and on.
The civil war was about states rights,that our founding Fathers were straight foward about.The winners write the history books.So the federal goverment has ruled americans rights since then.It has just begun to manifest it's self lately.To the point they decide every part of our life.That is exactly what the founding fathers tried to prevent.The consitition and bill of rights are just pieces of paper right now.But We The People are reaching a breaking point.History does and always repet it's self.I along with many others are tired of the federal goverment in our lives.At some point the majority of people will notice.Please this is just a blog only a person with no answers starts their reply with your grammer and spelling shows that (add what ever stupid thing is to correct)
Ted had one part right States Rights should be reconized in a "UNION" we are a union not a KINGDOM as the federal goverment see's it.
Yeah, I don't think Ted knows what he is talking about. I personally don't think the U.S. would be better off if the south had won the war. I think either way, the U.S. would still be screwed up just as bad as it is now. What do you guys think?
i can appreciate that as i've heard stories from tourists based in that region.
Originally posted by pierregustavetoutant
reply to post by Honor93
This has been my personal experience about 90% of the time. And it is the personal experience of most of anyone I've ever known. I live in the New Orleans metro area. Perhaps that explains it. Maybe not. Just my experience.