It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheIrishJihad
Definitely not Space junk. That worn out argument is just a pathetic attempt to make believers look stupid but only makes you look bad.
35 Q: How much of it is “space junk”?
A: Very little, actually – if you use the standard definition of “space junk” to mean other satellites and pieces off of them, which constitute an impact hazard to human space missions and automated satellites as well. Because all orbiting objects are moving at tremendous speeds in different directions, when they do pass closely to each other, they zip past at several miles per second. Thus they are extremely difficult to detect visually. Anything that was seen over a period of time longer than a few seconds would have to have been something closely following the observer, and thus associated with the vehicle from which the observation was being made. Now, that's unless it was somebody else’s vehicle deliberately keeping pace, of course. But "space junk" as we commonly use the term? Hardly ever, maybe never.
Originally posted by knoledgeispower
Originally posted by Skywatcher2011
Originally posted by knoledgeispower
Originally posted by Destinyone
I used to play that game in college...it's called Asteroids.....
Des
edit on 6-7-2012 by Destinyone because: (no reason given)
funny I didn't know Asteroids could stop moving and then start moving again on there own.
Asteroids can stop as they choose to...when they want to move, they let out a small asteroid fart to propel them along a different or the same trajectory
well that one looked more like it dropped a deuce cause something was left behind .......
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by AllIsOne
BTW: the second UFO at 2:07 comes out of nowhere. It accelerates and then seems to slow down to geo-sync orbit as the first did. ....
It sure does look like it came out of nowhere, but consider another possibility: it emerged from shadow into sunlight. When it was in the dark, it wasn't visible. Then it got very bright. Would that also account for the way it looked, do you think?
Originally posted by ecoparity
Jim,
Would you happen to know which window the STS-80 footage was shot from and what the orbiter's attitude was at the time relative to the Earth?
Dr. Story Musgrave
Email from Jim Oberg // Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 5:00 PM
Subject: Oberg's solution to your STS-80 'UFO' video
Dear Story --
…it was great seeing you in Florida, and the Baykonur leg was fantastic…
Here's a piece of 'old business' -- the kinds of questions that keep coming up about 'dancing dots' on PLB videos on night passes (and at sunrise) over the years. One spectacular sequence was shown to you on a TV program, they ambushed you without providing context such as illumination conditions and even crew activities, and you answered graciously and candidly but were never given the keys to the full explanation (probably their intent from the beginning).
I wrote up a technical assessment of the video (and of a number of other famous 'UFO videos') showing they were nearby sunlit debris looking 'unearthy' (like you'd expect away from Earth). I'm linking to it below, for your use, and I'd hope you could give me your appraisal of how close I came to fully explaining it.
There are hundreds of thousands of kids out there seeing youtube videos of UFOs buzzing space shuttle missions. It's not just the UFO buffs anymore, it's much more widespread and it's impacting the attitudes of a lot of pro-space young people. I want to get more rational, prosaic explanations onto my website to offer a counter to this silliness. Can you help with quotable encouragement and other insights?
Thanks!
From: "Story Musgrave" To:
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by AllIsOne
BTW: the second UFO at 2:07 comes out of nowhere. It accelerates and then seems to slow down to geo-sync orbit as the first did. ....
It sure does look like it came out of nowhere, but consider another possibility: it emerged from shadow into sunlight. When it was in the dark, it wasn't visible. Then it got very bright. Would that also account for the way it looked, do you think?
Originally posted by buzzEmiller
reply to post by JimOberg
That does not just about do it! A bunch of other links? What do you expect the astronauts to say, anyway...
I believe that you are getting lazy & won't discuss things in the present, thus all this 'case closed'...'been said before'...'it's been solved'...etc...not the ATS spirit, chasing off debate & snuffing out threads with 'go to my site'.
Originally posted by Ectoplasm8
I understand it's not exciting that it's space debris or ice, but learn to let it go and move on and stop making these foolish claims.
Originally posted by JimOberg
We don't have to turn our back on anomalous apparitions outside spacecraft, and we shouldn't -- because one thing they HAVE been in the past is clues to vehicle malfunction. That reason alone explains why flight crews and Mission Control always WANT to know more about anything strange that might be seen -- NOT to 'cover up' and ignore them.
Originally posted by JimOberg
And the possibility always remains open that somewhere, sometime or other, human space travelers will meet others. Or catch glimpses of them, accidentally or on purpose.
Originally posted by AllIsOne
To all the debunkers:
HOW DOES SPACE DEBRIS CHANGE DIRECTION AND THEN GOES INTO GEO-SYNC?
I'm shouting because nobody wants to answer that question.
Originally posted by JimOberg
And that from a guy with a long record of being caught out at making things up -- such as a non-existent Canadian astronaut dumped from a non-existent shuttle flight for non-existent UFO testimony -- that you get mad about when it's brought up again?
Pretty weak, Martyn. Pretty bigoted and closed-minded.
Please explain why we should NOT believe what the astronaut crews say about the videos.
Originally posted by buzzEmiller
reply to post by buzzEmiller
JIM...how else do you think CSA astronaut Mark Hatfield got his "last minute" 1st ever flight...?