Apollo 17 Photography Stations Located To Within 50 cm On LROC Map, page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 29 times


reply posted on 30-6-2012 @ 09:45 PM by PsykoOps
reply to post by grubblesnert



Yes I looked hard. I looked absolutely everywhere. I have seen all corners of the web. Didn't find these pictures you were talking about. So where are they?


reply posted on 30-6-2012 @ 10:17 PM by grubblesnert
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to
post by grubblesnert



Yes I looked hard. I looked absolutely everywhere. I have seen all corners of the web. Didn't find these pictures you were talking about. So where are they?

Thank you for reporting in! Keep up the excellent work. The next step is to carryout your Yahoo and google searchs (you did try Yahoo didnt you?) for the love of cheese and rice dont forget Yahoo!
Anyway like I was saying:
1. Thank you for reporting in.
2. keep up the excellent work..
3 for the love of cheese and rice dont forget Yahoo!

And..... dont stop. I feel your getting close. I myself would have pictures posted all over this place except my "n" key is messed up and I wont get a new one for nearly another week or so. I mean try to google " ASA doctored photos" and see what you find it's down right aggravating. (so once again, keep up the excellent work)

The prize may still be yours! prove my argument wrong and you will be the winner!
I have faith in you! Don't let everyone down. Others are monitoring our corespondence (I would assume) and are awaiting the results of your efforts. As you are probably are already aware. Your reputation and credibility could possibly be compromised if you are unsuccesful in scouring the "Worldwide interweb" and retrieving this information.
Dont loose heart, keep on the straight and narrow
and, Always look on the sunny side
Most importantly keep looking!


reply posted on 1-7-2012 @ 06:04 PM by denver22
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People



Yes correct i have studied the ins and outs of NASA and all the apollo missions etc
I cannot find a single one of the original images doctored.

It is these charlatan sites, sucking in the masses who are gullible enough to follow
such shepherd material.


reply posted on 1-7-2012 @ 06:10 PM by denver22
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People



Thing is it doesn't take long for one to debunk these charlatans claims if one looks
to debunk them.Keep up the good work buddy,saw you on a few threads etc.



reply posted on 11-7-2012 @ 04:52 AM by Saint Exupery
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
Originally posted by DJW001
The highest resolution photos at the time were from the Lunar Orbiter, which could resolve objects about 60 meters across. This team was able to identify objects less than a meter large. Furthermore, the Apollo 17 traverse covered an area measured in kilometers. That is an extremely large set to build, and an even harder set to light.


DJW, was 60 meters really the best resolution they had for Apollo 17?


Actually, except for a small corner (on the lower-left in
this image - west is up), the Lunar Orbiter missions did not image the Taurus-Littrow Valley at all. It was not even on the list of candidate landing sites until early 1970 - after the Lunar Orbiter missions had concluded.
Apollo 15 imaged the valley at medium resolution (~7m) using the Mapping (Metric) Camera...

AS15-M-0970
AS15-M-0971
AS15-M-0972
AS15-M-0973
AS15-M-1112
AS15-M-1113
AS15-M-1114
AS15-M-1402
AS15-M-1402
AS15-M-1403
AS15-M-1404

...and at high-resolution (~1-2m) using the Panoramic camera:

AS15-P-9552
AS15-P-9554
AS15-P-9557
AS15-P-9559

Landing & EVA maps were made from these images.

Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
Pete Conrad, February 6th 1971 ABC News, stated that his mission had maps with 1 meter resolution. Pete also says that Apollo 14 is working with maps that are of 2 meter resolution. Is the commander of Apollo 12 right or wrong?

Conrad was right.
Lunar Orbiter 1 and Lunar Orbiter 3 took high-resolution (~1m) images of the area where Apollo 12 would land. Here is a zoomable version of 3137-h2b (south is up) that includes "Surveyor Crater" half-way down and 1/4 in from the left. Surveyor 3 is barely visible as a white dot. You can compare this with last years LROC image of the same area at 0.24m/pixel resolution (north is up). Surveyor Crater and the Apollo 12 landing site are just over half-way down, in the middle.

All of the Lunar Orbiter images are available here. and Arizona State University is adding versions with their zoomable interface here.
edit on 11-7-2012 by Saint Exupery because: there weren't enough links. I had to add more. I could quit any time I want to. I just don't want to. It's not like I'm hooked or anything... *I* don't have a problem. YOU'RE the one with the problem!



reply posted on 11-7-2012 @ 08:23 AM by Ove38
Originally posted by DJW001
I'm sure you've seen the more recent images:
www.hq.nasa.gov...


looks like images of the maps they made forty years ago


Apollo 14 landing site


Back of Apollo 14 landing site
edit on 11-7-2012 by Ove38 because: link fix



reply posted on 11-7-2012 @ 08:47 AM by DJW001
reply to post by Ove38



looks like images of the maps they made forty years ago


Except the images you posted are from 2010:

Apollo 14 Landing Site

The surface plate from the Apollo 14 lunar simulator finally arrived, a bit tricky to ship safely. Very exciting…

From Lunar Legacies: “The plate is made of modeling paste over contoured fiberglass and contains an exact high-relief replica of the lunar surface at the Apollo 14 landing site, the surface over which the simulator camera panned over to simulate a lunar surface approach and landing. Using various lighting and filtering techniques, this plate was made to look like the actual landing site with the expected lighting conditions and view for the astronauts looking out the LM simulator windows. The plate shows the landmark craters Doublet and Triplet used by the Apollo 14 crew to determine their landing target. There are various small nicks and scuffs, mostly from the camera ramming the plate after a power blip in the LMS, and the plate weighs about 10-12 pounds. This plate was one of several used in the Simulator for training, and is very possibly the only one salvaged after the Apollo program.”


www.flickr.com...
edit on 11-7-2012 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-7-2012 @ 08:51 AM by DJW001
reply to post by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep



I will believe men landed on the moon, when you can proof to me that men can build a device that is capable of taking them there....



Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Hubble\'s Hidden Treasures - Incredible views of the Universe
  Posted 17 days ago with 40 member flags
Mars curiosity Sol2 Anomalies
  Posted 11 days ago with 22 member flags
Curiosity Just Went Through Mud?
  Posted 0 days ago with 22 member flags
Mars: Fears Curiosity Will Contaminate Planet
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags
Milky Way in detail.
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Went to the moon, we never went, was scared off, still going!?
  Posted 15 days ago with 11 member flags