Originally posted by hesse
The genius Stanley Kubrick could have still pulled off that hoax. Interesting information mate!edit on 26-6-2012 by hesse because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wildespace
I wonder if the Lunar Reconaissance Orbiter can swing into an even lower orbit to get even higher-res images of the landing sites.
Originally posted by H1ght3chHippie
I stand corrected, the first official lunar lander was Luna 9, landed on Moon in January 1966.
That is 8 years prior to Apollo 17.
So again: The Russians did land on the moon 8 years before Apollo 17, yet you still show low-resolution LRO photographs
Originally posted by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
reply to post by DJW001
Interesting video, yet it doesn't proof much.
After the rocket leaves my sight, how do I know where it go, or what it does? For all I know it just falls back to earth out of my sight.
Also, video footage of the event does not proof anything. I was just told this in this thread and another thread too.
vvvedit on 11-7-2012 by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep because: (no reason given)