Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Apollo 17 Photography Stations Located To Within 50 cm On LROC Map

page: 7
29
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 23 2012 @ 12:51 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 




posted on Jul, 23 2012 @ 01:38 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 23 2012 @ 02:29 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 26 2012 @ 12:35 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 25 2012 @ 01:00 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 25 2012 @ 11:23 AM
link   
A lot of times with sort of thing you may need to calibrate the maps from scratch. It can be tricky.



posted on Aug, 25 2012 @ 03:03 PM
link   
R.I.P neil.
You took giant steps and leaps for all mankind and wil be sorely missed..
A true hero, we will never forget you! it's one giant loss for us all .



posted on Aug, 25 2012 @ 06:39 PM
link   
Neil was without peer. He could take a shot and then some. I loved him like a brother. I loved him like a father. I loved him so dearly I cannot stand this day. Oh Neil we love you so much.



posted on Aug, 25 2012 @ 06:46 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 16 2012 @ 10:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by hesse
The genius Stanley Kubrick could have still pulled off that hoax.
Interesting information mate!
edit on 26-6-2012 by hesse because: (no reason given)


genius so many errors on 2001 to be a genius!
edit on 16-10-2012 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 02:51 AM
link   
I wonder if the Lunar Reconaissance Orbiter can swing into an even lower orbit to get even higher-res images of the landing sites.



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by wildespace
I wonder if the Lunar Reconaissance Orbiter can swing into an even lower orbit to get even higher-res images of the landing sites.


You might like this




posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 07:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by H1ght3chHippie
I stand corrected, the first official lunar lander was Luna 9, landed on Moon in January 1966.

That is 8 years prior to Apollo 17.

So again: The Russians did land on the moon 8 years before Apollo 17, yet you still show low-resolution LRO photographs


DO YOU even understand what resolution means



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 07:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
reply to post by DJW001
 


Interesting video, yet it doesn't proof much.

After the rocket leaves my sight, how do I know where it go, or what it does? For all I know it just falls back to earth out of my sight.

Also, video footage of the event does not proof anything. I was just told this in this thread and another thread too.

vvv
edit on 11-7-2012 by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep because: (no reason given)


Well Jodrell Bank In the UK tracked the missions and the Russian probes as well!






top topics



 
29
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join