That was my immediate thought. Drudge didn't want to end up like Breitbart.

not very popular here either....

I wonder why?

Originally posted by jjf3rd77
not very popular here either....

I wonder why?

ATS is out of the same place Cavecreek hosting who started up CCBILL years ago. And given the financial backing of CCBILL and the size of Cavecreek one would be safe to assume they have ulterior motives all together. I personally had some dealings with CCBILL and Cavecreek. I will not get into but, will tell you that they are snakes.

It would not shock me if ATS, having the same address as them, is nothing more than a huge Disinfo station. And judging from those posting to the 911 thread and supporting the B****S**** NIST report you would have to be a moron to not think they have ulterior motives.

Any who have a net connection and think the NIST report was true is either brain dead or sold their soul to support the lies. There is not one doubt in my mind 911 was a lie to get us into war and further tightening their grip on American's throats.

This thread being removed from the ATS Recent Posts as well as Drudge report. Someone does not want fast furious being a hot topic... For Sure!


Adding: I would repost this to ATS but I do not have 20 posts to permit me to do so. You should repost it and see how long it stays up..

---

---

Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady

As for ATS. They get a from me on the Fast and Furious. I have posted several stories about it that were practically ignored. When the subject comes up it is obvious ATS overall knows little of the scandal.

So much for conspiracy freaks huh? What is it harder when one is starring at you right in the face? Or maybe, most people here from the US are democrats. In fact, I haven't been able to find much chatter about this scandal at all on the internet. It could be just the curse of summer, and the perfect time to actually have this scandal!

Then I get yelled at for posting non-conspiracy subjects....

Awwww That was funny. OK. No more jokes. I was off topic.

Just kidding.

I wear a large.

You know everytime I saw this I thought someone was taking away the movie then when I heard the president's name I thought the president was taking it away. Anyway shouldn't this still be cached on Google's servers if one was to search the right strings?

I don't know about fast and furious, but Drudge's coverage of the Ron Paul campaign was exactly in line with the "mainstream" media. They simply ignored Ron Paul.

Now, I pretty much look at Drudge to find out what the mainstream is up to. I don't consider this to be a trustworthy source.