Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
I hope you enjoy the video and I'm looking forward to some intelligent discussion on the content. All opinions are welcome but let's try and keep it
civil. Personally, I can't even consider the possibility of jet fuel to cause those beams to melt and to cause molten steel that lasted for weeks.
And no way in hell would the planes that hit the two towers cause building 7 to collapse.
All right, let's have an intelligent discussion...but we both know that in a day or two the truthers are going to destroy this thread into a quagmire
of pedantic arguments over the mass of the concrete in the floors and Bush's connections to the Nazis.
FIRST, this guy is being horribly fast and loose with the facts he's presenting. You saw right in the video that thermite doesn't explode- it burns
really hot and really fast. If something goes KABOOM, unless it's a nuclear bomb that releases 100,000 degrees it isn't going to have any energy
to melt steel- it's going to shatter it, and if it has the energy to melt steel like thermite does then it isn't going to use up all it's energy
creating the KABOOM. So, all this guy managed to do it point out how the NIST report doesn't explain what we saw/heard, and then come up with
ANOTHER explanation that doesn't explain what we saw/heard. With a building of that size, if there were genuinely demolitions in the building, you
wouldn't need to be microanalyzing the dust or magnifying video looking for signs of explosions- there's be flashes all over the building and it's
be as blatant as a stick of dynamite going off.
SECOND, This whole "thermite" discussion is entirely based on the report from Steven Jones, who supposedly found traces of thermite in the dust.
That report has now been irrefutably been debunked by peer review reports, and it's been determined the thermite he found was actually paint, whcih
isn't surprising, since Jones isn't an explosives expert and almost certainly never encountered thermite in his career. Thus, any positions based
upon an incorrect report is by definition incorrect as well.
THIRD, and this is a big third, the towers were OCCUPIED buildings, as in they were chock full of tenants, inspectors, engineers, custodians,
electricians, security guards, and the like, and they were full time employees who worked there for years, so they knew the building and they knew
each other. They WILL have noticed any attempt to rig the building with demolitions and since almost all of the survived they WILL have reported
seeing strange things going on. If some stranger suddenly showed up sitting on your couch who announced he was really your son, are you really
telling me that wouldn't stand out?
FOURTH, which is what disappoints me about the truther movement on an intellectual level, is that literally every single accusation they come up with
needs to religiously rely on armies of sinister secret agents to make it plausible. Everything, from why NIST created this supposedly fake report to
how the explosives got into the building to why people are reporting seeing a plane hitting the Pentagon instead of a cruise missile, is always
because of "sinister secret agents". How many people need to be in this supposedly "secret" conspiracy for it to work AND to successfully cover
it up? 5,000? 10,000? Or, are you suggesting that a handful of sinister secret agents snuck into the WTC and planted these explosives, and then
slapped on a fake mustache and slipped into the ground zero site and disposed of all the evidence, and then put on a fake beard and pretended to be
FEMA engineers, and then put on dark sunglasses and pretended to be NIST engineers? It's completely mental. All you're doing is saying "the
boogeyman" did it.
It's obvious to me that rather than looking at the evidence and then coming up with a scenario that best explains the evidence, you're coming up
with the scenario first and then specifically seeking out the evidence that conforms to it. This is patently phony becuase you're consciously
ignoring all the evidence that proves why it WASN'T controlled demolitions. For one thing, why does this video intentionally leave out the collapse
of the penthouse from the WTC 7 video? That's one of the key pieces of evidence that backs up the NIST report.
Now let the childish "I'm really a sinister secret agent" and "Bush has connections to the Nazis" pillow fight begin.