WISE makes startling "Brown Dwarf" discovery, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times


reply posted on 9-6-2012 @ 09:37 AM by DJW001
reply to post by JibbyJedi



www.sciencedaily.com... ceDaily%3A+Latest+Science+News%29


But, unlike bats, our intelligence can devise machines that can make the invisible visible to us.



reply posted on 9-6-2012 @ 11:08 AM by DJW001
reply to post by stirling



Yes a little less than twenty percent chance ...but that doesnt mean we are not accompnied or even herded along by more than one dwarf......
The brown dwarf idea is not dead till the preturbations of the OOrt cloud are expained, as well as all near space, mapped and scanned for such objects...
I thought, however, that they been doing this for decades already.....
This project is hardly over yet......


The most important thing being that the hunt has been on for over twenty years. Absence of evidence can sometimes be be considered as evidence of absence.


reply posted on 9-6-2012 @ 11:12 AM by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by DJW001



Interesting discovery, yet you been trying to debunk a lot of Nibiru threads in the past, so lets just call this brown dwarf planet Marduk? Maybe Tyche, hell even Nibiru...


reply posted on 9-6-2012 @ 11:21 AM by SunnyDee
reply to post by CrikeyMagnet



I agree, but if you have been around a while, DWJ is frequently in the nibiru-planet X threads, pretty much putting down any thoughts or possibilities of a nibiru, and making many in the process feel like fools for considering it, so I felt it should be pointed out he seemed to give his thread a shameless bump with his last sentence of a "sun companion".


reply posted on 9-6-2012 @ 03:17 PM by ngchunter
Originally posted by stirling
Yes a little less than twenty percent chance ...

Actually it's less than half that likely. Wide separated binaries, defined as a separation greater than about 200 AU, make up about 9 percent of local stars at best:
articles.adsabs.harvard.edu...
If our solar system were a "binary," it would have to be one such system; it's clearly not a close binary system with two stars closely orbiting each other at small distances as many binaries are, so that leaves about a 9% chance of it being a binary based on pure random chance. Realistically we know the odds are even less than that; we know there's no binary star anywhere near 200 AUs of the sun. If it exists it would have to be at Oort cloud distances, an even smaller proportion of the population of local stars. I wouldn't hold my breath with odds like that.

The brown dwarf idea is not dead till the preturbations of the OOrt cloud are expained,

What's there to explain? Why there's a slight perceived abundance of comets from a given arc of the sky? Could have just as easily have been due to a close encounter with another star long ago in the solar system's history. Could there be a brown dwarf out there? Maybe, but there's no particular reason to believe that's true rather than anything else. The odds of it being true are far lower than most around here seem to understand.


reply posted on 9-6-2012 @ 03:19 PM by Phage
reply to post by JibbyJedi


What humans can perceive in the visible spectrum is ridiculous, we are blinder than bats.

WISE did not use the visible spectrum.


reply posted on 9-6-2012 @ 03:25 PM by Phage
reply to post by stirling


The brown dwarf idea is not dead till the preturbations of the OOrt cloud are expained, as well as all near space, mapped and scanned for such objects...

A brown dwarf is not the only possible explanation. WISE has "mapped" the entire sky. There are, I know, at least two astronomers who are eagerly searching the data for any indication of a large unknown body.
edit on 6/9/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 9-6-2012 @ 03:31 PM by Dustytoad
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to
post by JibbyJedi



www.sciencedaily.com... ceDaily%3A+Latest+Science+News%29


But, unlike bats, our intelligence can devise machines that can make the invisible visible to us.


And even then they decide to invent Dark Energy and Dark matter which can not be detected in any direct way that make up 90% of everything hahaha...

Come on now we are still as blind as bats. Well, the bats that actually have poor eyesight that is.
edit on 6/9/2012 by Dustytoad because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 9-6-2012 @ 03:33 PM by Phage
reply to post by bjarneorn


How about radio frequencies?
Ultraviolet?
X-ray?
Anything else?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Hubble\'s Hidden Treasures - Incredible views of the Universe
  Posted 17 days ago with 40 member flags
Mars curiosity Sol2 Anomalies
  Posted 11 days ago with 22 member flags
Curiosity Just Went Through Mud?
  Posted 0 days ago with 22 member flags
Mars: Fears Curiosity Will Contaminate Planet
  Posted 1 days ago with 21 member flags
Milky Way in detail.
  Posted 14 days ago with 13 member flags
Went to the moon, we never went, was scared off, still going!?
  Posted 15 days ago with 11 member flags