It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rhinoceros
reply to post by MrXYZ
He's just going to copy&paste that list again. He will never answer why there aren't 100 million year old fossils of humans, bears, rhinos, elephants, giraffes, etc. In his mind, humans and dinosaurs existed in this planet at the same time some 6,000 years ago.
A long time ago (let's not fight over 10k or 14.5b years...the rest is crazy enough) there was some super powerful being that came out of nothing to create everything. Why? Because something can't come from nothing...except for that being of course. Anyway, that guy created everything including humans.
That powerful being let some time pass and very accurately killed off 99% of his creation (accurately because the timeline in which the animals/plants died fit the theory of evolution perfectly...which is impossible because that theory/hypothesis is clearly wrong) over time.
That super powerful being simply decided to forge billions of fossils to trick scientists into believing in evolution and to "test people's faith".
Of course all that doesn't matter because according to edmc, radiometric dating is totally wrong.
Originally posted by edmc^2
While RADIOMETRIC DATING - is for dating "ROCKS" as they retain the long-live radioactive isotopes, like 'rubidium/strontium, thorium/lead, potassium/argon, argon/argon, or uranium/lead, all of which have very long half-lives, ranging from 0.7 to 48.6 billion years. Good for dating the earth's strata.
Am I clear enuff? I hope so.
Originally posted by rhinoceros
reply to post by MrXYZ
He's just going to copy&paste that list again. He will never answer why there aren't 100 million year old fossils of humans, bears, rhinos, elephants, giraffes, etc. In his mind, humans and dinosaurs existed in this planet at the same time some 6,000 years ago.
-- Dr. Ian Malcolm zeys:." .... two species that were never meant to coexist on earth, have been forced to do so, ..."
Originally posted by edmc^2
Originally posted by rhinoceros
reply to post by MrXYZ
He's just going to copy&paste that list again. He will never answer why there aren't 100 million year old fossils of humans, bears, rhinos, elephants, giraffes, etc. In his mind, humans and dinosaurs existed in this planet at the same time some 6,000 years ago.
hahahaha rhino you're also following the footstepd of Mr. XYZ - blind leading the blind.
Can you please show me where I said "humans and dinosaurs existed in this planet at the same time some 6,000 years ago."?
I refer you to famous line in the movie "Jurassic Park"
-- Dr. Ian Malcolm zeys:." .... two species that were never meant to coexist on earth, have been forced to do so, ..."
One is on the top of the food chain while the other is the food, know what I mean?
Originally posted by edmc^2
Biblical speaking animals including dinosaurs were created first then (dino) disappeared on earth when their time came and gone.
As for why there are no "100 million year old fossils of humans, bears, rhinos, elephants, giraffes, etc."
Because there never was - it's a made up story by evolutionists.
I only have one question: where did the original life (God) come from?
In any case: the c14 dating method is still an inaccurate dating method unless of course the specimen is around the half-life of the carbon isotopes - which is about 5700 years.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by edmc^2
Again, C14 isn't the only dating method, and they all confirm eachother
For very old fossils they also date the soil directly below and above the fossil to get a broad range.
Anyway, you seem to have no clue about dating methods, so here's a link explaining it in detail: LINK
In any case: the c14 dating method is still an inaccurate dating method unless of course the specimen is around the half-life of the carbon isotopes - which is about 5700 years.
That post shows that you don't understand dating methods. C14 works back to around 50k years! Why? Because when i decays it doesn't just disappear, it decays INTO SOMETHING...which then also decays.
So no, C14 dating doesn't just work for around 10-11k years like those ridiculous creationist pseudo-science websites want you to believe. They simply omit to mention crucial bits that would easily show how crazy their claims are.
“the half-life of carbon-14 is only 5730 years, so the method cannot be used for materials older than about 70,000 years”.
“Scientists can use different chemicals for absolute dating: ·
Radiometric dating involves the use of isotope series, such as rubidium/strontium, thorium/lead, potassium/argon, argon/argon, or uranium/lead, all of which have very long half-lives, ranging from 0.7 to 48.6 billion years. Subtle differences in the relative proportions of the two isotopes can give good dates for rocks of any age.
Originally posted by Blue_Jay33
Silly rabbits, those tricks are for school kids.
It's the evolutionist lazy approach, to try to defend an already flawed concept.
The human brain can't comprehend 100 trillion years before even the start of the physical universe God existed and you can keep rolling that backwards an infinite number of times. We can't understand a being that has no beginning or end and time does not exist essentially for such a being. He just has time markers based on actions.
Originally posted by Blue_Jay33
Silly rabbits, those tricks are for school kids.
It's the evolutionist lazy approach, to try to defend an already flawed concept.
The human brain can't comprehend 100 trillion years before even the start of the physical universe God existed and you can keep rolling that backwards an infinite number of times. We can't understand a being that has no beginning or end and time does not exist essentially for such a being. He just has time markers based on actions.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by edmc^2
Pretty much all of those points are factually incorrect
Originally posted by rhinoceros
Originally posted by edmc^2
While RADIOMETRIC DATING - is for dating "ROCKS" as they retain the long-live radioactive isotopes, like 'rubidium/strontium, thorium/lead, potassium/argon, argon/argon, or uranium/lead, all of which have very long half-lives, ranging from 0.7 to 48.6 billion years. Good for dating the earth's strata.
Am I clear enuff? I hope so.
Again. What is the actual problem? Are the bones transformed into stone not at least as old as the rock they're made of? Are you implying it is just a "leap of faith" to think so?edit on 8-6-2012 by rhinoceros because: (no reason given)
"bones transformed into stone not at least as old as the rock they're made of?"
.
transformed into stone
Half-life refers to the length of time required for 50% of the parent material to decay into the daughter product.
Uranium 235 to Lead 207 (half-life = 710,000,000 years)
Uranium 238 to Lead 206 (half-life = 4,500,000,000 years)
Thorium 232 to Lead 208 (half-life = 14,000,000,000 years)
Rubidium 87 to Strontium 87 (half-life = 47,000,000,000 years) - this is the most common system used for dating rocks older than 100 million years.
Potassium 40 to Argon 40 (half-life = 1,300,000,000 years) - this method is very often used to date rock less than 60 million years old.
Carbon 14 to Nitrogen 14 (half-life = 5,570 years)--- There are 3 forms (isotopes) of carbon occuring in nature: Carbon 12 (accounts for 99%), Carbon 13 (accounts for 1%), and Carbon 14 (accounts for less than 1%).
While alive, plants and animals incorporate these isotopes of carbon into their tissues at the ratio found in the atmosphere. Upon death, the Carbon 14 in their tissues begins to decay. By measuring the remaining amount of Carbon 14, the age of the fossil can be determined. This method can be used to date material ranging in age from a few hundred years to about 50,000 years. The use of Carbon 14 permits the determination of age directly a fossil. For fossils greater than 50,000 years old, the age of the fossil is found indirectly by determing the age of the rock associated with the fossil. Carbon 14 dating has a dating range of several hundred years before present to 50,000 years before present.
The use of Carbon 14 permits the determination of age directly a fossil.
For fossils greater than 50,000 years old, the age of the fossil is found indirectly by determining the age of the rock associated with the fossil.
Did the dinosaur disappear ~65 million years ago as concluded by modern science? If by evolutionist you refer to people who understand modern synthesis, it doesn't claim there were humans, bears, etc. 100 million years ago. Rather, back then, their common ancestor was some nocturnal mouse-like thingy. You say we didn't evolve from that (like the trail of evidence shows), but you also don't think we were around back then. So, what is our origin?
“Uranium series analyses of human bone samples from the Del Mar and Sunnyvale sites indicate ages of 11,000 and 8,300 years, respectively. The dates are supported by internal concordancy between thorium-230 and protactinium-231 decay systems. These ages are significantly younger than the estimates of 48,000 and 70,000 years based on amino acid racemization, and indicate that the individuals could derive from the population waves that came across the Bering Strait during the last sea-level low.”
Originally posted by edmc^2
So the answer is YES and NO!
YES - in that the elements inside the ROCK-FOSSIL are as old as the the earth's age, which is - based on radiometric dating - around 4 billion years old.
NO - in that the ORGANIC MATERIAL - the actual CARBON life-form - the BONE no longer exist.
Even if it's still there they can only date it as far as 50K years - to an evolutionist trying to prove evolution - this is NOT acceptable because of pre-conceived notion that dino-bones should be in the millions of years old. So the latter dating method is accepted as the official age.
Originally posted by edmc^2
But if you insist on a 100 million year old dino, that's your choice. At least i know my facts.