May 29 2012 - Most recent Nibiru/Planet X pictures - Very Clear!

page: 4
17
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 30 2012 @ 02:40 AM
link   
I think there is a lot of stubbornness on the part of the OP .
People have taken the time to offer him perfectly reasonable explanations , yet he still chooses to stand by his opening post.

Airplane windows are generally double glazed . This means the light from the image ( The Sun ) is bouncing between the two panes and then onto the lens of the camera which then will have a protective coating over the lens and will also cause extreme light to bounce onto the camera's mirror , hence giving the illusion of multiple light sources , but that is all it is , an illusion.

I will re-emphasize what others have said . The OP needs to gain a basic working knowledge of his equipment and how extreme light behaves when viewed between multiple planes of glass.

I hope this helps to clear things up .

DP




posted on May, 30 2012 @ 02:42 AM
link   
reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard
 
Do you read you're own posts? The OP is no more or less delusional.



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 02:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by dayve

Originally posted by heineken
reply to post by dayve
 


so if we find life out there...

how do you explain the Jesus Story..

a) he repeated his story on every planet in the universe?

b) he chose our planet from all the universe?

c) his story is flawed

hope you face my question like a matured person and not evade away
edit on 30-5-2012 by heineken because: (no reason given)


Im not sure, to be honest, i dont think their is any other life out their so the story works for me... I dont think its a good idea to smack talk Jesus..... You should just leaaaaaaave it alone..


i agree to leave the jesus story alone on this thread since it will be waaaay off topic..still i would like to give you a small gift...i will try to picture you your current situation on the matter...i hope it will help you one day get enlightenment on the subject...Gift



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 02:50 AM
link   
reply to post by dawnprince
 


There are so many threads like this, they all follow the same theme of ignorance and denial of any explanation other than there own!
What exactly is the point of creating a thread for discussion when you wont accept criticism? Set up your own website and write a blog if that's how you feel!

I have said before and I will say again:
"Playing Chess with people like this is like playing chess with a pigeon, you could be the greatest player in the world, the pigeon with still knock over all the pieces, sh$t on the board and strut around triumphantly!"



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 04:22 AM
link   
reply to post by dayve
 


"Im not sure, to be honest, i dont think their is any other life out their so the story works for me... I dont think its a good idea to smack talk Jesus..... You should just leaaaaaaave it alone"

The multiverse is infinitely vast, how can you believe there is no other life out there? Is god limited by the speed of light or just crap at creation? You would think he/she would at least double up and create a few more realitys/planets just in case us mad monkeys make an arse of this attempt. Omnipotent and only one little blue and green marble created! Why just us, that seems so arrogant to me, just like all organised religion. Take of the blinders mate, its a big place out there, we cant be the only ones surely?
edit on 30-5-2012 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)
edit on 30-5-2012 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)
edit on 30-5-2012 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by Lighterside
reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard
 
Do you read you're own posts? The OP is no more or less delusional.



Here we go! The essence of ad hominem attacks! I'm delusional for believing in something I can see with my own eyes, but you're fine for choosing to ignore reality? I think you have it backwards buddy. Check the psychiatric definitions....

A big thanks to Heineken and some others for bringing up the quality of this thread - teamwork is very powerful - the "knowledge management specialists" know this.

I didn't use to believe in this, but I started adding up many very disparate occurences which otherwise had no rational explantion - and the only logical one was Planet X. A couple of examples:

188 day earthquake cycle - which has not been debunked - it happened
Hillary Clinton recalling all ambassador's last year - it happened - first time ever
FEMA camps
On the verge of martial law
Wild weather
Upsurge in volcanic activity
Strange noises
Increasing sinkholes
Record temps
Crop circles - most have a PX related message
The coverup - see my other thread about dropped/missing EQ's
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Just a few - if I can get off my ass I'll do a proper thread.
edit on 30-5-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: addendum
edit on 30-5-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: spelling
edit on 30-5-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: addendum
edit on 30-5-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: epiphany



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:24 AM
link   


I can see with my own eyes


There are 2 adjective words here, that are very important (bearing in mind in not knocking anyone, i WISH i could see something in the sky, but in my 14 years of astronomy, i have not seen anything that is inexplicable or any rogue planets, or anything next to the sun) the words are :

'I' and 'own'

So, i ask this, why is it only you, with your own eyes that see something? Where as the rest of us see reflections/refractions/lens effects and so forth. Again, im not challenging knowledge, but that stuff is basic science which has recently been taught to my 7 year old brother...



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by EddyR3



I can see with my own eyes


There are 2 adjective words here, that are very important (bearing in mind in not knocking anyone, i WISH i could see something in the sky, but in my 14 years of astronomy, i have not seen anything that is inexplicable or any rogue planets, or anything next to the sun) the words are :

'I' and 'own'

So, i ask this, why is it only you, with your own eyes that see something? Where as the rest of us see reflections/refractions/lens effects and so forth. Again, im not challenging knowledge, but that stuff is basic science which has recently been taught to my 7 year old brother...


I've taken many pictures, and though not an expert, I can discern the difference between lens flares and artifacts and objects which are not.



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:43 AM
link   
Ok well i took 6 images this morning with 3 different cameras

Image 1 was through glass (double glazed uPVC)
Image 2 was without glass

Camera 1 was a Fujifilm Finepix AV120
Camera 2 was a Canon EOS 350D
Camera 3 Blackberry Torch 9800

I found flares in all glass images, and nothing unusual in the other images, so me, and my own personal interpretation would be, there is nothing next to the sun, but your views seem to differ, why is this? Am i a liar? Or are you seeing things that arent really there? Maybe its my mind that is removing something that is there?

Does anyone have a logical explanation? (Other than "Planet x/Nibiru/Other anomoly" can only be seen in the southern hemisphere)

There are 2 obvious choices....its either :

You are seeing things that are there, and im not
OR, your seeing things that arent there which would back up the comment of being delusional.

I'm very much a man of science, so like to see things in black and white, which is always the best way, this will rule of user error and invalid data, this experiment for me is proof, that for me, in England UK, there is nothing next to the sun.



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:44 AM
link   
Oh and for reference, i wish there was something weird going on, it would make Astronomy a LOT more interesting!



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by EddyR3
Ok well i took 6 images this morning with 3 different cameras

Image 1 was through glass (double glazed uPVC)
Image 2 was without glass

Camera 1 was a Fujifilm Finepix AV120
Camera 2 was a Canon EOS 350D
Camera 3 Blackberry Torch 9800

I found flares in all glass images, and nothing unusual in the other images, so me, and my own personal interpretation would be, there is nothing next to the sun, but your views seem to differ, why is this? Am i a liar? Or are you seeing things that arent really there? Maybe its my mind that is removing something that is there?

Does anyone have a logical explanation? (Other than "Planet x/Nibiru/Other anomoly" can only be seen in the southern hemisphere)

There are 2 obvious choices....its either :

You are seeing things that are there, and im not
OR, your seeing things that arent there which would back up the comment of being delusional.

I'm very much a man of science, so like to see things in black and white, which is always the best way, this will rule of user error and invalid data, this experiment for me is proof, that for me, in England UK, there is nothing next to the sun.


oh man oh man

please go to page to..as you will see..it is not the Sun that is being photographed man...please go back to page 2 and come back to fix your post...

i repeat..

the object pictured from the window plane is not our SUN...its not even close to the brightness of our Sun...so why are you looking for an object next to the sun?

thanks
edit on 30-5-2012 by heineken because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 05:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE


I've taken many pictures, and though not an expert, I can discern the difference between lens flares and artifacts and objects which are not.


Can you really? Will you be hailing this guy? The idiot evens turns the camera on himself. Why are people so confused? All he had to do was put his finger up and his 'discovery' would be in tatters. Some people are easily fooled and the madness continues just like your initial post. At least this confused guy can recognise the lens flare.





edit on 30-5-2012 by tommyjo because: Malformed link corrected



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 06:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by EddyR3
Oh and for reference, i wish there was something weird going on, it would make Astronomy a LOT more interesting!


There is something weird going on, well at least in the geological community.

I have documentation in this thread of many earthquakes being recorded then dropped on the ANF site, and not even appearing on the USGS sites:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I would welcome any well thought out explanations. The only one that makes sense is that they are trying to hide something.



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 06:01 AM
link   
And there is only 1 image of this, thats not in the news all around the world, or being imaged by millions of Astronomers around the world?

So, your telling me, there is a heavenly body with moons (as it appears in the image) that appears closer to us than the sun, and your the only 1 that can see it? Is it visible to the naked eye? No? Why not? Have you performed spectroscopy on it to find out its composition? Have you studied this neighbor in detail? Even if there was a brown-dwarf/dark star/neutron star or any other IR only body, that close to us, it would be MORE than visible to the naked eye, not to mention the distruption that it would cause, not only to Earth, but every other close neighbor in the Solar System....



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 06:02 AM
link   
The object photographed from the window of the plane..is NOT our SUN

If in doubt about this..please go to page 2 of this thread where I posted how our Sun would look like from a _..the object in question is nowhere near the brightness of our Sun

till now..there were further 2 more explanations given..

A) Camera's Flash light

B) An LED light pointed to the window

regarding A i doubt...since...the shot was taken pretty close to the window since only a small part of the window frame is visible and thus I expect a larger bright light for a flash

Regarding B..it is still plausible and if proven fact this thread must be put in the HOAX bin since it would be evident the photographer tried to mislead the people

thanks
edit on 30-5-2012 by heineken because: (no reason given)
edit on 30-5-2012 by heineken because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 06:05 AM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


Do you have a reference of seismic activity over a longer period than a few years? Ie. 10/20/30 years and correlated the data into readable information and noted that there has been an increase in not only size or position, but frequency?

This would back up the theory of increasing seismic activity. Why they are disappearing is of no concern to me although im sure there is a logical reason for this, it would be an increase more than anything, which to my knowledge hasn't happened just yet,



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 06:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by EddyR3
Oh and for reference, i wish there was something weird going on, it would make Astronomy a LOT more interesting!


There is also this video here in this thread, where the "object" in question slowly moves behind some clouds - something a lens flare or artifact could not do by definition!

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Here is a slow, close-up break down of it courtesy of one of the posters:

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 06:10 AM
link   
reply to post by heineken
 


Yep, your right, thats deffinately not our sun, nor is it appearing in the sky, because if it was, there would be many, many many many MANY more images, and not only through a camera, but through telescopes both optical and solar imaging equipment, there is NOTHING stopping anyone going outside to take a picture, and if this object(s) were in the sky, then there would be uproar around the world.

Simple as that really, my main question, why only 1 image of it?



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 06:12 AM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


Ok, i live in the UK, and its cloudy, i have some sun glasses, IF this object is there, it will still be there now right? So, if i go outside, and take a video of the sun through my glasses, this object WILL be there, right?



posted on May, 30 2012 @ 06:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by EddyR3
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


Do you have a reference of seismic activity over a longer period than a few years? Ie. 10/20/30 years and correlated the data into readable information and noted that there has been an increase in not only size or position, but frequency?

This would back up the theory of increasing seismic activity. Why they are disappearing is of no concern to me although im sure there is a logical reason for this, it would be an increase more than anything, which to my knowledge hasn't happened just yet,



Of the ten largest quakes of the last century, half have occurred in the last EIGHT years, or since Planet X entered the solar system. And of course we can assume over the last ten years they have been downgraded by the USGS.
1. Valdivia, Chile. 22 May 1960 . Magnitude 9.5
2. Prince William Sound, Alaska. 28 March 1964. Magnitude 9.2
3. Sumatra, Indonesia. 26 December 2004. Magnitude 9.1
4. Sendai, Japan . 11 March 2011. Magnitude 9.0
5. Kamchatka, Russia. 4 November 1952. Magnitude 9.0
6. Bio-bio, Chile. 27 February 2010. Magnitude 8.8
7. Off the coast of Ecuador. 31 January 1906. Magnitude 8.8
8. Rat Islands, Alaska. 2 April 1965. Magnitude 8.7
9. Sumatra, Indonesia. 11 April 2012. Magnitude 8.6
10. Sumatra, Indonesia. 28 March 2005. Magnitude 8.6

One country's leading seismologist has said (from a place not as well controlled by the PTB) there are too many earthquakes, sure, he's not the world's leading seismologist, but more knowledgeable than anyone on here, including myself:

thewatchers.adorraeli.com...





new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join