May 29 2012 - Most recent Nibiru/Planet X pictures - Very Clear!

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE


It just isn't there. That's all there is to it. You should drop this malarkey and carry on living your life the way you say you have been anyway. You'll be much happier.

Originally posted by Amadeo
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

 

It just isn't there. That's all there is to it. You should drop this malarkey and carry on living your life the way you say you have been anyway. You'll be much happier.

I'm always living my life every day to it's fullest as if each day is the last - but I'd like to have options if Planet X is going to pass us by and cause a geographic pole shift - like some supplies and safe locations picked out - anything wrong with that? There are probably tens of millions of people around the world already doing that in case of economic collapse - of which there is a very real possibility - my preps just take it one step further.

You take issue with that? You don't think people should be prepared for disasters and/or economically challenging circumstances?

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE


It's good to be prepared for emergencies, but it makes no sense to prepare for the impossible. There is no unknown planet out there in the solar system. Even if there were, a new planet mass could not cause a pole shift. Pole shifts themselves are not possible as described by Hancock. The scientific term is a true polar wander or TPW. They are fast on a geological time line such as movement of 1 meter a year. That is 10x the speed of plate motion. That is not the rapid motion as claimed by Hancock or Hapgood.

Being prepared is wise. Preparing for the impossible makes no sense.

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE


You're not living each day like it's your last if you're spending so much time on sites like ATS discussing what amounts to your impending doom, in which you could die in any number of horrible ways. Don't tell me thoughts like that never crossed your mind.

I don't know where you got the last part of your post from because I didn't say anything remotely resembling that. Great imagination there but you're wasting it believing in this sort of stuff. Do something more beneficial to YOU with it.

Originally posted by Amadeo
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

 

You're not living each day like it's your last if you're spending so much time on sites like ATS discussing what amounts to your impending doom, in which you could die in any number of horrible ways. Don't tell me thoughts like that never crossed your mind.

Please show me where I've posted anything even resemebling that statement, about dying in various horrible ways.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

 

It's good to be prepared for emergencies, but it makes no sense to prepare for the impossible. There is no unknown planet out there in the solar system. Even if there were, a new planet mass could not cause a pole shift. Pole shifts themselves are not possible as described by Hancock. The scientific term is a true polar wander or TPW. They are fast on a geological time line such as movement of 1 meter a year. That is 10x the speed of plate motion. That is not the rapid motion as claimed by Hancock or Hapgood.

Being prepared is wise. Preparing for the impossible makes no sense.

I think we are going to have to agree to disagree.

If you think that less than 200 years after the industrial revolution man pretty much knows all there is to know about phsyics, gravity, magnetism, geology, chemistry, biology, genetics and the universe etc - I say you will be in for some big shocks over the next couple decades and maybe even over the course of this year.

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE


Jeezo. See the comma in that sentence that cuts it in two? Everything after that is my addition. I thought that would have been obvious but never mind.

Let me ask you something else -- do you really believe, in your heart of hearts, that's there's an invisible planet up there with visible moons, that only certain people can see and that those people usually have a camera to hand? That there are no verifiable reports of multiple eyewitnesses on the ground seeing these moons? (but not the planet, obviously; that would be silly).

Originally posted by Amadeo
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

 

Jeezo. See the comma in that sentence that cuts it in two? Everything after that is my addition. I thought that would have been obvious but never mind.

Let me ask you something else -- do you really believe, in your heart of hearts, that's there's an invisible planet up there with visible moons, that only certain people can see and that those people usually have a camera to hand? That there are no verifiable reports of multiple eyewitnesses on the ground seeing these moons? (but not the planet, obviously; that would be silly).

Does my answer matter to you? It seems like your mind is made up - not to mention the fact you like to put words into my mouth - I never said there were certain people who could see the Planet X complex - just better times and methods.

Again, there are thousands of pictures on the internet, some are lens flares etc some are not.

My heart of hearts has nothing to do with head, I'm trying to use my brain in my head. Which tells me:

1. Hillary Clinton wouldn't recall all the US ambassador's and envoys of the world back to the US, for the first time EVER, if something big and hugely confidential wasn't going down.

2. The NDAA wouldn't have been passed if something catastrophic was not on the verge of occurring.

3. FEMA camps built to hold millions - far away from traditional disaster areas as in Pennsylvania, Arizona, Idaho - wouldn't be built unless something catastrophic wasn't on the verge of happening.

4. Research the Denver airport - if that doesn't wake you up nothing will.

5. Articles like this from accredited geophyscists:

thewatchers.adorraeli.com...

6. Really, there are hundreds of other signs - I will start a thread one of these days.

Where are you physcially located, are you in Scotland? Do you have any chance to move to another country?

I notice a good majority of your posts are defending homosexuality - so I don't think you are a "knowledge management specialist".

A three months ago I thought Nibiru and Alien contact was a joke as well, but I finally started really researching and digging - and came to my own conclusions - I realized a long time ago that people depend on the government or MSM to tell them of anything monumentous happening in the world - this may be dangerous to your health.

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
A three months ago I thought Nibiru and Alien contact was a joke as well, but I finally started really researching and digging - and came to my own conclusions - I realized a long time ago that people depend on the government or MSM to tell them of anything monumentous happening in the world - this may be dangerous to your health.

You should build a time machine and go back 3 months.

Your life would be a lot happier and less anxiety-ridden over a fairytale. I only hope your manic obsession over this doesn't spill into your home life with your family. Sadly, I'm guessing it does.

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

1. Hillary Clinton wouldn't recall all the US ambassador's and envoys of the world back to the US, for the first time EVER, if something big and hugely confidential wasn't going down.

Something huge was going down, back in 2011 when she called the meeting:

Officials say the meeting will include discussion of foreign policy priorities for 2011, The Associated Press reported, as well as an assessment of the fallout from the release of secret diplomatic cables by WikiLeaks. Clinton will meet individually with diplomats working in unstable countries.

www.politico.com...

They are all back on the job now.

2. The NDAA wouldn't have been passed if something catastrophic was not on the verge of occurring.

The NDAA is a routine military appropriations bill that has been passed every year since 2008. The controversial clause about indefinite detention is being challenged in court and will probably be ruled unconstitutional.

3. FEMA camps built to hold millions - far away from traditional disaster areas as in Pennsylvania, Arizona, Idaho - wouldn't be built unless something catastrophic wasn't on the verge of happening.

If they are even being built.

4. Research the Denver airport - if that doesn't wake you up nothing will.

The Denver airport was a bureaucratic disaster. Its tasteless artwork will eventually be painted over.

5. Articles like this from accredited geophyscists:

thewatchers.adorraeli.com...

Quake expert Gheorghe Marmureanu: Something is wrong! There are too many strong earthquakes

thewatchers.adorraeli.com...

Too many strong earthquakes compared to what, Gheorge?

6. Really, there are hundreds of other signs - I will start a thread one of these days.

What did any of the above have to do with the picture in the OP? I think you need to give it rest for a while.

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

If you think that less than 200 years after the industrial revolution man pretty much knows all there is to know about phsyics, gravity, magnetism, geology, chemistry, biology, genetics and the universe etc - I say you will be in for some big shocks over the next couple decades and maybe even over the course of this year.

I didn't say anything about that.

What I did say is that pole shifts do not happen. There is strong evidence against pole shifts. It is not a matter of no evidence for them. It is very strong evidence against.

The same is true for a planet coming by. The evidence is strongly against it.

You can pretend all you want, but evidence is not lacking. It is very much against those ideas.

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

1. Hillary Clinton wouldn't recall all the US ambassador's and envoys of the world back to the US, for the first time EVER, if something big and hugely confidential wasn't going down.

2. The NDAA wouldn't have been passed if something catastrophic was not on the verge of occurring.

3. FEMA camps built to hold millions - far away from traditional disaster areas as in Pennsylvania, Arizona, Idaho - wouldn't be built unless something catastrophic wasn't on the verge of happening.

4. Research the Denver airport - if that doesn't wake you up nothing will.

5. Articles like this from accredited geophyscists:

thewatchers.adorraeli.com...

6. Really, there are hundreds of other signs - I will start a thread one of these days.

Where are you physcially located, are you in Scotland? Do you have any chance to move to another country?

I notice a good majority of your posts are defending homosexuality - so I don't think you are a "knowledge management specialist".

A three months ago I thought Nibiru and Alien contact was a joke as well, but I finally started really researching and digging - and came to my own conclusions - I realized a long time ago that people depend on the government or MSM to tell them of anything monumentous happening in the world - this may be dangerous to your health.

Nothing you listed is even suggestive of a Nibiru or Pole shift or any odd idea.

You might want to research the Denver airport and see that the claims made about it are ludicrous at best. The stories that have been told are so idiotic I think they were invented to make pole shifts look reasonable in comparison.

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
[

Planet X itself is best seen at sunrise/sunset with IR filters, the chemical composition of it's moons is different and the same doesn't apply to them.

The transit of Venus across the face of the Sun has now started. Do you think that all those observing using filters will suddenly stumble upon this mysterious Planet X? Think about how many people will be observing this transit? Will your excuse be that they are using the wrong filters? Will Planet X be using its cloaking device during the transit of Venus?

Originally posted by stereologist


What I did say is that pole shifts do not happen. There is strong evidence against pole shifts. It is not a matter of no evidence for them. It is very strong evidence against.

Stereologist, while I agree with you about Niburu, I am going to have to part company with you on there being strong evidence against pole shifts. For fear of being too far off-topic I am going to simply say this, there is a LOT of strong evidence in favor of there being pole-shifts (most specifically geomagnetic) embedded within sediment readings of previous volcanic eruptions. The orientation of small particles of metal within them gave a decent clue as to the poles at the time....given that type of evidence it strongly suggests that the poles have swapped many times.

There is less strong evidence and more speculation however, with respect to axial pole shifts as it only seems fair to denote the difference between the 2.


As far as Niburu? I'm still well rooted in the "nonsense" corner.

reply to post by alphabetaone


A pole shift is an event defined by Hancock as a physical shift of the crust over the interior of the Earth. Some people, as you do in your post, use the term pole shift to refer to a magnetic event. I am using the term as coined by Hancock. Geomagnetic reversals as you point out are well established. It is this very paleomagnetic evidence which strongly rules out pole shifts. There are other lines of evidence as well.

There is less strong evidence and more speculation however, with respect to axial pole shifts as it only seems fair to denote the difference between the 2.

There can be changes to the axis of the Earth, but those can happen without being pole shifts. These are often detected after large quakes which redistribute mass within the Earth. The position of the axis changes, but is still parallel to the axis before the quake.

I don't see we are that much different except I have been using pole shift to refer only to the type of event described by Hancock.

Originally posted by stereologist


I don't see we are that much different except I have been using pole shift to refer only to the type of event described by Hancock.

Ok I'll accept that.

In practical use and logistically speaking you are correct. A pole shift, is very different than any type of geomagnetic reversal... I agree

I'm in Tasmania the sun follows a north pattern right along bass straight.

I think its lens flare I have even nearly replicated this photo with a welding mask.

reply to post by amraks


That's an excellent photo showing the anomaly.

Star just for that alone. Although I DO believe just from the photo and it's size I had to break out my SPF 80

The Orwellian ridicule/mock/opposition to this very subject should tell you something. The paid shills/disinformants on this site, and youtube are easy to spot. When someone goes around trying to discredit all relevant PX videos on YT, it's clear as day they have an agenda.. and it doesnt have anything to do with helping 'We The People'. I have been fortunate enough to film this obejct in front of the sun, using an infra-red floppy disk as a filter, and my house to shade the sun. Heres the thing.. this is bigger than 'Planet X'. This is the winged disk depicted by the ancients.. This is YHWH. Its the Sun that dies on the cross... not the son

my youtube channel is here for the ultimate truth. Link is below. God Bless

www.youtube.com...

I wont respond to "its a lens flare". I know what I see and so do a ton of others..

reply to post by The GameKeeper

Why cant i see it with my £900 ($1600) Lunt PST solar scope? Yet, you with your £1 floppy disk can? lol