It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

May 29 2012 - Most recent Nibiru/Planet X pictures - Very Clear!

page: 15
17
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 10:58 AM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


I live in Idaho. Pssst, no FEMA camps here.

Please show me the camp here, or the other camps for millions. Oh, damn. You cant.

If your beloved Planet X was anywhere close to reality, we'd be seeing lots of out-of-the-ordinary problems already, sir. But the problems we have right now are the same they've always been - a volatile earth populated by a bunch of parasites (humans).




posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 11:00 AM
link   
reply to post by The GameKeeper
 


I'm sorry I get a little testy when someone calls me a "paid shill" for simply asking what the heck you think you're talking about? It looks like every single other filmed bit of the sun through the atmosphere, complete with all prerequisite banding and artifacts created by a HUGE light source hitting your lens...

It still does not answer the question why you can see it with a primitive setup and anyone with higher end stuff cannot?



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 11:20 AM
link   
the pic is not, not photoshoped, it is lenz flare.



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 11:23 AM
link   
omg, you have already got your 15 min. of time in, oh, why not more increadible non credible evidence. I think you need attention, NO.



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 11:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by vkey08
reply to post by The GameKeeper
 


I'm sorry I get a little testy when someone calls me a "paid shill" for simply asking what the heck you think you're talking about? It looks like every single other filmed bit of the sun through the atmosphere, complete with all prerequisite banding and artifacts created by a HUGE light source hitting your lens...

It still does not answer the question why you can see it with a primitive setup and anyone with higher end stuff cannot?


Many professionals see it, some die others get the lesson, scroll down to Murders related to Planet X:

www.bibliotecapleyades.net...


On July 1, 1999, 20 French astronomers were killed in a mysterious accident as they were headed up the mountain to the observatory on Plateau de Bure on a cable car (iram.fr...). There were reports that the cable had been cut.


Amateur astronomy sites talking about things they "shouldn't" be get heavily hacked, infiltrated, go off-line, such as those that talked about NASA's coverup of the comet's NEAT interaction with the Sun:

www.bibliotecapleyades.net...


Amateur astronomers participating in a number of web page discussion boards again began to experience a high degree of hacking with boards going offline. This only added to growing accusations of foul play and suspicions about a NASA conspiracy to suppress the true nature of comet NEAT’s precise location and interaction with the sun.





edit on 13-6-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: correction



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 11:39 AM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 



www.abovetopsecret.com...


Other than being astronomers who died of natural causes or in traffic accidents, what connects this list of casualties? Is there anything that ties them in to your imaginary Planet X?



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 11:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 



www.abovetopsecret.com...


Other than being astronomers who died of natural causes or in traffic accidents, what connects this list of casualties? Is there anything that ties them in to your imaginary Planet X?


There are many astronomers who researched Planet X who died under mysterious circumstances - in fact most of them are dead. Best example of course is Robert Harrington, US Naval astronomer, who died from a "suspicious" fast acting cancer. His colleague Tom Van Flanderen died in 2009 from a similar suspicious fast acting cancer.

Here is the latest, a young, healthy Japanese astronomer who apparently was "mugged", and hit his head on the ground, but later during the autopsy no trauma on the head or anywhere else on the body could be found:

www.rttnews.com...

Here is a large list of deaths which due to the circumstances are strongly suspected to be assassinations:

www.scribd.com... 05

Don't be so naive.



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 12:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 



www.abovetopsecret.com...


Other than being astronomers who died of natural causes or in traffic accidents, what connects this list of casualties? Is there anything that ties them in to your imaginary Planet X?


There are many astronomers who researched Planet X who died under mysterious circumstances - in fact most of them are dead. Best example of course is Robert Harrington, US Naval astronomer, who died from a "suspicious" fast acting cancer. His colleague Tom Van Flanderen died in 2009 from a similar suspicious fast acting cancer.

Here is the latest, a young, healthy Japanese astronomer who apparently was "mugged", and hit his head on the ground, but later during the autopsy no trauma on the head or anywhere else on the body could be found:

www.rttnews.com...

Here is a large list of deaths which due to the circumstances are strongly suspected to be assassinations:

www.scribd.com... 05

Don't be so naive.


And of course you've got information that this is all related to your imaginary Planet X, right? Or maybe you've got information about why information on your imaginary planet is being kept secret? How about what kind of disasters that we're going to be expecting during the pole shift that this imaginary planet is going to supposedly cause?



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 12:10 PM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


Harrington died a long time ago. Flandern had off ideas for a long time before his death. The Japanese astronomer was doing radio astronomy. How do you ties these together?

Had Harrington lived he would have seen that Planet X did not exist. Before he died there was reason for such a search. The 1987 flyby of Neptune stopped the search when it was realized it was due to an error in the mass of Neptune. Fladern thought the face on Mars was real. He thought that gravity propogated faster than the speed of light.

Seems pretty sketchy to me.



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 12:14 PM
link   
Here are what some famous scientists have to say about Planet X:

www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

For example, Einstein:


To Einstein, the 'gradualistic notions' of geology were 'a habit of mind' and 'not necessarily justified by the empirical data'. Defying contemporaries and predecessors alike, Einstein went right to the heart again. The theory of earth crust displacement formulated by Charles H. Hapgood - which 'electrified' Einstein - has since gained critical acclaim and support from specialists in superficially unrelated fields.

"I find your arguments very impressive and have the impression that your hypothesis is correct. One can hardly doubt that significant shifts of the crust of the earth have taken place repeatedly and within a short time."



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 12:27 PM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


Einstein wasn't talking about Planet X, he was talking about plate tectonics.



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 12:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Here are what some famous scientists have to say about Planet X:

www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

For example, Einstein:


To Einstein, the 'gradualistic notions' of geology were 'a habit of mind' and 'not necessarily justified by the empirical data'. Defying contemporaries and predecessors alike, Einstein went right to the heart again. The theory of earth crust displacement formulated by Charles H. Hapgood - which 'electrified' Einstein - has since gained critical acclaim and support from specialists in superficially unrelated fields.

"I find your arguments very impressive and have the impression that your hypothesis is correct. One can hardly doubt that significant shifts of the crust of the earth have taken place repeatedly and within a short time."


Einstein said nothing about your imaginary Planet X in anything that was attributed on that site. He spoke about crust displacement on Earth, and that the theory that crust displacement had happened was entirely possible. He made no mention of a rogue planet.

Way to misrepresent, sir!



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 12:48 PM
link   
reply to post by vkey08
 


I didnt specify any particular person.. guilty consciense?



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 12:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


Einstein wasn't talking about Planet X, he was talking about plate tectonics.


Plate tectonics and Planet X are obviously related.



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 12:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by flyswatter

Einstein said nothing about your imaginary Planet X in anything that was attributed on that site. He spoke about crust displacement on Earth, and that the theory that crust displacement had happened was entirely possible. He made no mention of a rogue planet.

Way to misrepresent, sir!


Einstein was referring to Hapgood's work.

Hapgood referred to geographic poleshifts.

Many believe geographic poleshifts are caused by regular passes of Planet X.

I don't see any misrepresentation.



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 01:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE

Originally posted by flyswatter

Einstein said nothing about your imaginary Planet X in anything that was attributed on that site. He spoke about crust displacement on Earth, and that the theory that crust displacement had happened was entirely possible. He made no mention of a rogue planet.

Way to misrepresent, sir!


Einstein was referring to Hapgood's work.

Hapgood referred to geographic poleshifts.

Many believe geographic poleshifts are caused by regular passes of Planet X.

I don't see any misrepresentation.


Many believe, thats fine. But neither of them mentioned it at all. You're trying to use them as evidence, but your whole argument deals not with what they talked about, but that others think an imaginary planet is causing the things they were talking about.

Nobody needs to debunk what you're talking about here because you're doing a pretty good job of it on your own.

No, plate tectonics are not obviously related to your imaginary Planet X. No, Einstein and Hapgood were not talking about a rogue planet. No, you draw lines between these things and spin a web that obscures things enough to make people believe it.

Please, remove yourself from magical Chrstmas land and lay off the peyote.



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 01:23 PM
link   
reply to post by The GameKeeper
 


NO just sick of anyone who is skeptical of this whole PlanetX thing being called Paid Shills, it gets really old after a while... Why can't you just refer to people that disagree as skeptics or that sort without resorting to insults..



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 01:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by flyswatter
No, plate tectonics are not obviously related to your imaginary Planet X. No, Einstein and Hapgood were not talking about a rogue planet. No, you draw lines between these things and spin a web that obscures things enough to make people believe it.

Please, remove yourself from magical Chrstmas land and lay off the peyote.


So this man, Dr. Robert Harrington, a US Naval astronomer, who believed in Planet X which is on the public record, was smoking peyote as well:

www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

www.bibliotecapleyades.net...



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 01:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by vkey08
reply to post by The GameKeeper
 


NO just sick of anyone who is skeptical of this whole PlanetX thing being called Paid Shills, it gets really old after a while... Why can't you just refer to people that disagree as skeptics or that sort without resorting to insults..


When they stop using phrases like this:


Please, remove yourself from magical Chrstmas land and lay off the peyote.


Maybe we'll ease back on the "knowledge management specialist" terminology. It's a two-way street.
edit on 13-6-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: addendum



posted on Jun, 13 2012 @ 01:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE

Originally posted by flyswatter
No, plate tectonics are not obviously related to your imaginary Planet X. No, Einstein and Hapgood were not talking about a rogue planet. No, you draw lines between these things and spin a web that obscures things enough to make people believe it.

Please, remove yourself from magical Chrstmas land and lay off the peyote.


So this man, Dr. Robert Harrington, a US Naval astronomer, who believed in Planet X which is on the public record, was smoking peyote as well:

www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

www.bibliotecapleyades.net...


Astronomer at the US Naval Observatory, not a US Naval astronomer. There's a difference, and I wanted to clarify that first.

Much of the core of Harrington's belief of this planet was built upon the perturbations of Uranus and Neptune. The problem is that this theory was destroyed by data from the Voyager flyby in 1989 and a paper published in 1993. Read this - adsabs.harvard.edu...

But to answer your question - no, I dont think he was smoking peyote. But he WAS wrong.



new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join