Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

May 29 2012 - Most recent Nibiru/Planet X pictures - Very Clear!

page: 11
17
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 31 2012 @ 07:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 



I'll explain that to you explain why all these earthquakes are being dropped from earthquake reporting sites:

Read the USGS reporting rules. It explains things quite clearly.


The USGS picks up a 2.5 magnitude earthquake in Micronesia but can't pick up multiple 5+ magnitude earthquakes in Canada that happen in one day in one of the most seismically stable regions of the whole planet, the Canadian Sheild?

Anytime you see an earthquake location appear on any earthquake reporting site map, it means at least three seismograph stations have picked up the same seismic wave, they need a minimum of three stations to triangulate the position. Following? Hence error bias from any one station reporting a "false" earthquake is eliminated. Of course they can be adjusted a few decimal points up or down.

Also, the USGS rules don't explain why these earthquakes are dropped from other legitimate earthquake reporting sites that also need three stations to record the same seismic wave in order to put a point on the map.

Great evidence of the coverup of Planet X - I knew no one would be able to refute it. Go back to your controllers and try hard to come up with something.

For any that would like to see my original earthquake post:

www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 31-5-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: addendum
edit on 31-5-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: epiphany




posted on May, 31 2012 @ 07:34 AM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


Why have you moved on to earthquakes when this thread is about Nibiru being visible in the sky? Why are you ignoring all verifiable evidence in order to push this lunatic story? Why have you ignored my request for an explanation as to why I cannot see Nibiru with my own eyes when I look up?

If you truly believe this nonsense you should be able to answer my questions satisfactorily.

*flush*



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 07:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by EddyR3
reply to post by Fr3bzY
 


Thats an awful example, no offence, but you cannot alter/add filters to an already compressed image and propose it to be 'atmospheric plasma' because it has a few sparkly bits in it lol

I can do the same with an image of my dog to be honest using Photoshop and adding a few fancy filters to bring out what looks like 'plasma' in his eyeballs, well, i like to think we would all know better and that it would be in fact just jpg artifacts, as in your example


get me the original then

bet you it will show up the same...
maybe some of it is compression...but i can't say for sure without original picture...
i just enhanced what was in the pic posted...

still it doesnt seem like planet to me...its to 'square' to be one imo..



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 07:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Also, the USGS rules don't explain why these earthquakes are dropped from other legitimate earthquake reporting sites that also need three stations to record the same seismic wave in order to put a point on the map.



Have you tried emailing and asking the question?



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 07:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by Vasteel

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by Vasteel
 

The three days of darkness will occur due to the leaning of the earth due to the magnetic influence of Planet X, from what I took it the earth will be sideways, stil rotating, with the South Pole facing the sun for those three days and the north pole facing away for those three days. Here is the last 7 1/2 weeks timeline:


But again we have the problem of hemispheres.
If the south pole was pointed at the sun for three days for any reason whatsoever, not just this Nibiru stuff, then it would be three days of broad daylight for say Australia, most of Africa and much of South America, right?

It would only be three days of darkness for everywhere so far north of the equator.

This also means that there would be some places just a few degrees either side of the equator where you'd have a constant state of sunrise or sunset with the sun appearing to circle the horizon as it were. I was thinking earlier how cool it'd be if I had an airplane and could position it so that I had a sunrise and then move with the earths rotation so that I had a constant frozen sunrise


On topic: Where are we on the discussion that if a planet was visible in a line of sight just past the sun then it would be visible from both hemispheres?

EDIT: I've just has a look on Google earth and OK maybe not as much land as I thought would be in broad daylight if the south pole was aimed at the sun, the point kinda still stands though

edit on 30-5-2012 by Vasteel because: clarity
edit on 30-5-2012 by Vasteel because: comment about google earth


From what I know your comments on the three days of darkness are correct, most of the comments have a Northern Hemisphere bias, Southern Hemisphere three days of sun, and a band slightly north of the equator would see constant sunrises/sunsets depending on the wobble.

Apparently Planet X is more easily seen from the Southen Hemisphere as it is coming at us from below the plane of our eliptic, not ONLY seen from there.
edit on 31-5-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: spelling



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 07:42 AM
link   
reply to post by Pauligirl
 



Have you tried emailing and asking the question?


Why bother.

He wouldn't believe them anyway.

The whole Nibiru sham hinges on many different and varied groups of "They" keeping "IT" from the public.



No amount of evidence, common sense, research, illustrations, dumbing down, or facts will change some of the Nibirites minds that a nonexistent massive planet is near to us.

Then the OP launches in on earthquakes saying they are caused by Planet X

all the while ignoring the fact that if something that close and massive was doing that to tectonic plates,

the oceans tides would be Wildly unusual.

Not to mention the moons orbit, our orbit and the path of other planets and comets.


It's like talking to a deaf person while covering your mouth.
edit on 5/31/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 07:43 AM
link   
11 pages of drivel. How many minutes folks have wasted here looking at this crap.

Mods, please move this to the hoax bin. Pronto!



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 07:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE

Originally posted by Vasteel

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by Vasteel
 

The three days of darkness will occur due to the leaning of the earth due to the magnetic influence of Planet X, from what I took it the earth will be sideways, stil rotating, with the South Pole facing the sun for those three days and the north pole facing away for those three days. Here is the last 7 1/2 weeks timeline:


But again we have the problem of hemispheres.
If the south pole was pointed at the sun for three days for any reason whatsoever, not just this Nibiru stuff, then it would be three days of broad daylight for say Australia, most of Africa and much of South America, right?

It would only be three days of darkness for everywhere so far north of the equator.

This also means that there would be some places just a few degrees either side of the equator where you'd have a constant state of sunrise or sunset with the sun appearing to circle the horizon as it were. I was thinking earlier how cool it'd be if I had an airplane and could position it so that I had a sunrise and then move with the earths rotation so that I had a constant frozen sunrise


On topic: Where are we on the discussion that if a planet was visible in a line of sight just past the sun then it would be visible from both hemispheres?

EDIT: I've just has a look on Google earth and OK maybe not as much land as I thought would be in broad daylight if the south pole was aimed at the sun, the point kinda still stands though

edit on 30-5-2012 by Vasteel because: clarity
edit on 30-5-2012 by Vasteel because: comment about google earth


From what I know your comments on the three days of darkness are correct, most of the comments have a Northern Hemisphere bias, Southern Hemisphere three days of sun, and a band slightly north of the equator would see constant sunrises/sunsets depending on the wobble.

Apparently Planet X is more easily seen from the Southen Hemisphere as it is coming at us from below the plane of our eliptic, not ONLY seen from there.
edit on 31-5-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: spelling


Enough with this crap now please. You can't back up a single word you say. Give it up because no one is taking you seriously.



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 07:53 AM
link   
If you look very closely you can see they're the same object because they are not perfectly round giving it a unique finger-print if you will. It looks like a reflection or lens flare OP.

I don't think Nibiru is THAT visible. Besides being in an airplane doesn't give a person THAT much of an advantage. Sure they might be above the clouds but, that's about it.
Being at 9000-30,000 altitude isn't that much closer when dealing with something that's likely millions of miles away.



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 07:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
From what I know your comments on the three days of darkness are correct, most of the comments have a Northern Hemisphere bias, Southern Hemisphere three days of sun, and a band slightly north of the equator would see constant sunrises/sunsets depending on the wobble.

Apparently Planet X is more easily seen from the Southen Hemisphere as it is coming at us from below the plane of our eliptic, not ONLY seen from there.
edit on 31-5-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: spelling


Ok that answers what I asked on topic, so I'm outta this thread.
I'm sure that we will meet again in another thread to argue about earthquakes, gravity, telescopes and other nibiru entertainment stuff (nibutainment? that a word?) I'm sure that thread will be along in a few days or so



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 07:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by Amadeo

Enough with this crap now please. You can't back up a single word you say. Give it up because no one is taking you seriously.


Are you being forced to read this thread? Is anyone? This is my take:

Anyone can look at a thread topic and decide for themselves if it interests them or if they think it is a waste. Most normal people who think a thread is a waste will ignore it.

However, this thread is filled with people attacking it - fine - my take is that they don't really disagree - they are frightened of the public finding out - and their comments are directed at people reading the thread who might be sitting on the fence.

My advice to those sitting on the fence - do your own research and make up your own minds - don't let me or others tell you what to think - decide for yourselves - but do your own research!

Many say I haven't proven anything - yet my earthquake thread is great evidence of the coverup of Planet X and no one seems to be able to come up with an alternate explanation - because there is none. Here it is again:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

If you don't like this topic - fine - no one is forcing you to read it.

But as I have said all along, there are thousands of whacky threads on ATS, yet most draw few debunkers, the ones that are close to sacred truths/secrets draw out the most "knowledge management specialists".



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 08:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by Vasteel

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
From what I know your comments on the three days of darkness are correct, most of the comments have a Northern Hemisphere bias, Southern Hemisphere three days of sun, and a band slightly north of the equator would see constant sunrises/sunsets depending on the wobble.

Apparently Planet X is more easily seen from the Southen Hemisphere as it is coming at us from below the plane of our eliptic, not ONLY seen from there.
edit on 31-5-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: spelling


Ok that answers what I asked on topic, so I'm outta this thread.
I'm sure that we will meet again in another thread to argue about earthquakes, gravity, telescopes and other nibiru entertainment stuff (nibutainment? that a word?) I'm sure that thread will be along in a few days or so




It was nice having a "real" discussion with you! And I appreciate your respect and inquisitiveness. Most here could take a lesson from you, one that should have been learned around the high school level but was obviously not. Good luck!



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 08:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien
If you look very closely you can see they're the same object because they are not perfectly round giving it a unique finger-print if you will. It looks like a reflection or lens flare OP.

I don't think Nibiru is THAT visible. Besides being in an airplane doesn't give a person THAT much of an advantage. Sure they might be above the clouds but, that's about it.
Being at 9000-30,000 altitude isn't that much closer when dealing with something that's likely millions of miles away.


Good points, but at that altitude you have much less atmosphere to deal with, and whatever they are putting in the atmosphere.



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 08:06 AM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


The sun is a sphere, to us on Earth it appears as a circle and when it's reflected in the window there appear to be multiple circles.

Crop CIRCLES are typically CIRCULAR in shape. Sometimes there are more than one, sometimes there are other shapes that aren't circles. I can't believe I'm having to explain this to anyone...

Did you miss a few crucial episodes of Sesame Street as a kid or something? Perhaps the ones where they repetitively go over preschool level geometry?



edit on 31-5-2012 by Titen-Sxull because: fixed basic spelling error(s), I guess I missed Sesame Street too




posted on May, 31 2012 @ 08:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE

Originally posted by Amadeo

Enough with this crap now please. You can't back up a single word you say. Give it up because no one is taking you seriously.


Are you being forced to read this thread? Is anyone? This is my take:

Anyone can look at a thread topic and decide for themselves if it interests them or if they think it is a waste. Most normal people who think a thread is a waste will ignore it.

However, this thread is filled with people attacking it - fine - my take is that they don't really disagree - they are frightened of the public finding out - and their comments are directed at people reading the thread who might be sitting on the fence.

My advice to those sitting on the fence - do your own research and make up your own minds - don't let me or others tell you what to think - decide for yourselves - but do your own research!

Many say I haven't proven anything - yet my earthquake thread is great evidence of the coverup of Planet X and no one seems to be able to come up with an alternate explanation - because there is none. Here it is again:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

If you don't like this topic - fine - no one is forcing you to read it.

But as I have said all along, there are thousands of whacky threads on ATS, yet most draw few debunkers, the ones that are close to sacred truths/secrets draw out the most "knowledge management specialists".


Whether I choose to read this thread or not is beside the point, You are fearmongering and posting absolute nonsense and then you expect the rest of us to take you seriously and believe what you say. That just doesn't fly with me. You claimed in this thread that Nibiru is visible in the sky for all to see. I told you I can't see it and asked for an explanation which you chose to ignore. That sums your thread right up for me and if you think I'm going to refrain from commenting just because it bursts your little bubble then you're mistaken. I call BS as I see it.
edit on 31-5-2012 by Amadeo because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 08:33 AM
link   
reply to post by jazz10
 


And I purposely referred to Iris. Thanks for the off topic posting about iris.



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 08:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by Amadeo

Whether I choose to read this thread or not is beside the point, You are fearmongering and posting absolute nonsense and then you expect the rest of us to take you seriously and believe what you say. That just doesn't fly with me. You claimed in this thread that Nibiru is visible in the sky for all to see. I told you I can't see it and asked for an explanation which you chose to ignore. That sums your thread right up for me and if you think I'm going to refrain from commenting just because it bursts your little bubble then you're mistaken. I call BS as I see it.
edit on 31-5-2012 by Amadeo because: (no reason given)



The OP didn't make this thread specifically for your approval. That's number one.
Number two, it is OPs deep belief that Nibiru exists. As do millions of others. Me included.

OP also feels it's visible. You can't prove OP is wrong. Why?....just because YOU can't see it or because the news ain't reporting? That is where you're too egotistical and/or naive.

We simply don't know. And if someone wants to share their personal feelings with other like-minded people on a friggin CONSPIRACY forum, that is their prerogative. So it'll behoove you to know the difference between fear-mongering and sharing a belief.

You know who fear mongers? Your OWN government. So I think you may be upset with them and taking it out on your peers subconsciously !!!
edit on 31-5-2012 by Human_Alien because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 08:37 AM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 



The USGS picks up a 2.5 magnitude earthquake in Micronesia but can't pick up multiple 5+ magnitude earthquakes in Canada that happen in one day in one of the most seismically stable regions of the whole planet, the Canadian Sheild?

This just goes to show that you did not read the USGS reporting rules. Take the time to read the reporting rules and then all of your questions will be answered.


Anytime you see an earthquake location appear on any earthquake reporting site map, it means at least three seismograph stations have picked up the same seismic wave, they need a minimum of three stations to triangulate the position. Following? Hence error bias from any one station reporting a "false" earthquake is eliminated. Of course they can be adjusted a few decimal points up or down.

Are you guessing or did you look this up? Since you did not check on reporting rules I thinkyou are guessing.


Also, the USGS rules don't explain why these earthquakes are dropped from other legitimate earthquake reporting sites that also need three stations to record the same seismic wave in order to put a point on the map.

Try reading again.


Great evidence of the coverup of Planet X - I knew no one would be able to refute it. Go back to your controllers and try hard to come up with something.

Quakes are not correlated by any body other than the Moon. The Sun does not correlate with any quakes. Planet X does not exist as shown in 1987.



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 08:43 AM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 



From what I know your comments on the three days of darkness are correct, most of the comments have a Northern Hemisphere bias, Southern Hemisphere three days of sun, and a band slightly north of the equator would see constant sunrises/sunsets depending on the wobble.

Apparently Planet X is more easily seen from the Southen Hemisphere as it is coming at us from below the plane of our eliptic, not ONLY seen from there.

It is impossible for a planet to eclipse the Earth for 3 days.

The idiot and his drawings over at pole shift-a-ding-dong would have us believe that for 3 days a planet on a different orbital path would match velocities with the Earth for 3 days. That makes no sense at all since the Earth and other object are not at the same distances from the Sun, nor is the other object in the ecliptic. How dumb that guy think other people are?

Again. No one reported seeing anything during the annular eclipse viewed by hundreds of thousands to millions of people.



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 08:46 AM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 



Many say I haven't proven anything - yet my earthquake thread is great evidence of the coverup of Planet X and no one seems to be able to come up with an alternate explanation - because there is none.

The earthquake claim is based on the lack of reading USGS reporting rules. It all boils down to doing a tiny bit of research.





new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join