It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You're beyond reasoning with
Text
July 5 2011
Muslim women can be forced to remove their face veils during routine car stops under new powers granted to NSW police.
Premier Barry O’Farrell said cabinet had approved the move on Monday so police could properly identify motorists or any other people suspected of committing a crime.
“I don’t care whether a person is wearing a motor cycle helmet, a burqa, niqab, face veil or anything else, the police should be allowed to require those people to make their identification clear,” he said in a statement.
Last week, NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione said police needed stronger powers to identify women who wear full facial veils.
It follows the case of Sydney woman Carnita Matthews, who in November 2010 was sentenced to six months in jail for falsely accusing a police officer of forcibly trying to remove her burqa.
The case arose after Ms Matthews was pulled over while driving in Woodbine in June 2010.
However, the sentence was quashed on appeal last week after NSW District Court judge Clive Jeffreys ruled there was no evidence to confirm Ms Matthews filed a criminal complaint against the officer, because the person who did so was also wearing a veil and wasn’t positively identified.
An appeal has been launched against the decision but Mr O’Farrell said Attorney-General Greg Smith had been advised by the Director of Public Prosecutions it was unlikely to succeed.
However, Mr O’Farrell said the new police powers – which are expected to be in place within a couple of months – should help prevent a recurrence of such a case in the future.
“I have every respect for various religions and beliefs but when it comes to enforcing the law the police should be given adequate powers to make a clear identification,” he said.
Police have had the power to ask women to remove face veils during the investigation of serious offences but did not have such powers during routine car stops.
Mr O’Farrell later defended the move, saying the state’s Islamic Council has said the wearing of face veils is not compulsory.
“The good news is that the Islamic Council of NSW has made the point that it’s not compulsory in relation to their religion,” Mr O’Farrell told reporters in Sydney on Monday night.
“It’s also an issue with other religions, it’s also an issue with other cultures, but whether it’s the drivers’ licence or passage through customs, identity checks are required in this day and age and we’re determined to ensure police have the powers (to implement them).”
Mr O’Farrell said the law in its current form is “vague”.
“So we’re going to ensure if police have any concerns about anybody who is wearing any form of face mask, they can seek to establish that person’s identity and those people will be required to obey.”
Originally posted by poet1b
edit on 28-5-2012 by poet1b because: typos
Originally posted by redneck13
muslimvillage.com... e-given-power-to-remove-face-veils-for-id/
Text
July 5 2011
Muslim women can be forced to remove their face veils during routine car stops under new powers granted to NSW police.
Premier Barry O’Farrell said cabinet had approved the move on Monday so police could properly identify motorists or any other people suspected of committing a crime.
“I don’t care whether a person is wearing a motor cycle helmet, a burqa, niqab, face veil or anything else, the police should be allowed to require those people to make their identification clear,” he said in a statement.
Last week, NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione said police needed stronger powers to identify women who wear full facial veils.
It follows the case of Sydney woman Carnita Matthews, who in November 2010 was sentenced to six months in jail for falsely accusing a police officer of forcibly trying to remove her burqa.
The case arose after Ms Matthews was pulled over while driving in Woodbine in June 2010.
However, the sentence was quashed on appeal last week after NSW District Court judge Clive Jeffreys ruled there was no evidence to confirm Ms Matthews filed a criminal complaint against the officer, because the person who did so was also wearing a veil and wasn’t positively identified.
An appeal has been launched against the decision but Mr O’Farrell said Attorney-General Greg Smith had been advised by the Director of Public Prosecutions it was unlikely to succeed.
However, Mr O’Farrell said the new police powers – which are expected to be in place within a couple of months – should help prevent a recurrence of such a case in the future.
“I have every respect for various religions and beliefs but when it comes to enforcing the law the police should be given adequate powers to make a clear identification,” he said.
Police have had the power to ask women to remove face veils during the investigation of serious offences but did not have such powers during routine car stops.
Mr O’Farrell later defended the move, saying the state’s Islamic Council has said the wearing of face veils is not compulsory.
“The good news is that the Islamic Council of NSW has made the point that it’s not compulsory in relation to their religion,” Mr O’Farrell told reporters in Sydney on Monday night.
“It’s also an issue with other religions, it’s also an issue with other cultures, but whether it’s the drivers’ licence or passage through customs, identity checks are required in this day and age and we’re determined to ensure police have the powers (to implement them).”
Mr O’Farrell said the law in its current form is “vague”.
“So we’re going to ensure if police have any concerns about anybody who is wearing any form of face mask, they can seek to establish that person’s identity and those people will be required to obey.”
Originally posted by redneck13
So we’re going to ensure if police have any concerns about anybody who is wearing any form of face mask, they can seek to establish that person’s identity and those people will be required to obey.”
Originally posted by redneck13
any form of face mask, they can seek to establish that person’s identity and those people will be required to obey.”
Yes that sets the precedence any time security is a question.
those people will be required to obey
Originally posted by mysterioustranger
reply to post by Rosha
When those freedoms get into the way of potential attacks on our citizens...BECAUSE we have those very freedoms to think, act, dress, pray and worship as we'd like...then that is the only issue. And they and we we are being used for that very thing.
Originally posted by redneck13
What a crock, now is time for a total ban on the burka now. Open face society we have nothing to hide, do we?
those people will be required to obeyedit on 29-5-2012 by redneck13 because: m
Text
By ALYSSA NEWCOMB (@alyssanewcomb)
April 10, 2011
A controversial burqa ban passed by the French parliament last year will go into effect Monday, making the traditionally secular country the first in the European Union to ban the wearing of the head-to-toe Islamic covering.
In defiance of critics of the ban, who say it is anti-Islamic, President Nicholas Sarkozy told French lawmakers last year the burqa is not a religious symbol.
Under the new law, women caught wearing a burqa in public will face a warning, then a $200 fine.
The consequences are even heftier for a man if he forces a woman to wear a burqa -- a $43,000 fine.
Originally posted by redneck13
France continues to be the model. Unless they have very deep pockets, it looks as though they will be forced to obey
abcnews.go.com... d=13344555
Text
By ALYSSA NEWCOMB (@alyssanewcomb)
April 10, 2011
A controversial burqa ban passed by the French parliament last year will go into effect Monday, making the traditionally secular country the first in the European Union to ban the wearing of the head-to-toe Islamic covering.
In defiance of critics of the ban, who say it is anti-Islamic, President Nicholas Sarkozy told French lawmakers last year the burqa is not a religious symbol.
Under the new law, women caught wearing a burqa in public will face a warning, then a $200 fine.
The consequences are even heftier for a man if he forces a woman to wear a burqa -- a $43,000 fine.
Text
Burqa Ban Comes To the Netherlands. Finally.
+ Comment now
More than seven years after an Islamic extremist murdered Dutch filmmaker and commentator Theo van Gogh on the streets of Amsterdam; more than seven years after niqab-clad women exulted in Van Gogh’s hideous death (stabbed and shot, his throat sliced, and a knife plunged into his body pinning a lengthy note that promised a similar fate to others), and more than ten years after former Parliamentarian Ayaan Hirsi Ali warned of the oppression and radicalization taking place among Dutch Muslim women, Holland has, at last, banned the burqa. It becomes the third country in Europe to institute such a ban
Originally posted by nonono
In my country there's a law that says you can't wear a mask in public because it makes it difficult to identify you. I suspect a similar law would also exist in New Jersey... so why should this woman be allowed to wear a headscarf that hides most of her facial features?