Kodak Facility in New York state housed Underground Nuclear Reactor, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 18 times
Topic started on 16-5-2012 @ 03:38 AM by Arken

Kodak Facility in New York state housed Underground Nuclear Reactor


www.democratandchronicle.com
For more than 30 years, Kodak Park was home to a little-known underground labyrinth containing a small nuclear research reactor, one of the few of its kind in the world.

Still, the reactor was locked down, remotely surveilled and tightly regulated — mainly because it contained 3½ pounds of highly enriched uranium.

Company spokesman Christopher Veronda said he could find no record that Kodak ever made a public announcement of the facility. He also wasn’t sure whether the company had ever notified local police, fire or hazardous-materials officials.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.businessinsider.com


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 04:01 AM by twitchy
reply to post by Arken



That doesn't surprise me, Kodak also had a truck wreck here in NC a while back with a tanker load of '___'.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 16-5-2012 by twitchy because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 04:53 AM by HandyDandy
Let me get this straight:

A man drives past a state trooper and sets off the radiation alarm because he just had a medical procedure.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

But, Kodak can have a secret reactor for 30 years and no radiation alarms went off? I guess if it is shielded enough it wouldn't?
edit on 16-5-2012 by HandyDandy because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 05:07 AM by astra001uk
reply to post by Wrabbit2000



www.ga-esi.com... 66 small reactors were sold one of which was in Billingham ICI(North east england) for many years it was taken away to Windscale for decomissioning but hasnt been,even though the american government wanted it back!


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 06:13 AM by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by oghamxx



The Willis (formerly Sears) Tower in Chicago, completed in 1973, has long been rumored to have a small reactor in the 3rd subbasement.

I'm just having the mother of all facepalm moments in wondering what they'd be thinking to maintain such a thing to the present day. Can you imagine for even a moment what the activist atmosphere today would do if that were confirmed as fact for a small nuclear reactor to be operating a few levels under a downtown city like Chicago? Oh geeze... It'd become Mecca for every anti-nuke group on Earth. lol.....


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 06:41 AM by oghamxx
reply to post by Wrabbit2000



The proof would be if downtown Chicago ever had a major blackout but the tower did not lose power.

The story I heard was that it was not feasible (too costly) to tear up maybe 20 to 50 miles of the city to bring in enough electrical power for a project the size of the Sears Tower. Plus, for conventional power sources, they like to have at least one alternate source. The reactor was owned and run by the power company, then named Commonwealth Edison, who has/had several full scale reactors.

I have heard that the Sears (plus Discover card and outside clients) data center in the Chicago suburbs is deep underground with conventional electric power from 3 different sources plus generators and fuel for 30 days


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 06:45 PM by magma
reply to post by Arken



There is going to be many of these types of research devices around the world. I can not see how this is a problem. This device is not capable of causing any issues it seems.

I bet there are many many more dangerous devices like this in private hands that we will never onow about... until it is too late


reply posted on 16-5-2012 @ 07:25 PM by JBA2848
How long have they had this thing?

www.kued.org...


Declassified documents cited in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists highlighted yet another incident showing that the government was aware of the far-reaching effects of fallout. In the 1950s, film manufacturers at Eastman Kodak in Rochester, New York wondered why their film was fogging as though it had been exposed to radiation. Scientists linked the fogged film to nuclear tests in Nevada. The government warned Kodak about expected areas of heavy fallout so they could protect unexposed film. People living downwind never received the same courtesy.


Fogged film blamed on nuclear test in Nevada or a reactor in the basement?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags