Originally posted by Fluffaluffagous
But it is accepted as true until shown otherwise. This is what matters. No new investigation, etc will ever happen until that needle is moved. No
truther has managed to do that.
So what's your point? I should stop posting my feelings because of what you claim matters?
Another lie.The guv is not the only ones saying that planes>fire>collapse is the best explanation. ASCE, CTBUH, etc are not connected to any
guv agency.There are more, from other countries too, that agree. You cannot deny this.
Please stop accusing me of lying. Those agencies did not do the official investigation, they are simply repeating the official investigation
conducted by NIST. Do you really expect those agencies to come out against the government?
But not ONE agency has proven anything, that is the problem you fail to understand in your appeal to authority. I don't need you, or an agency, to
question my intelligence.
Strawman. The pull in - which is proven by simple physics - is not the only reason the ext columns got pulled in. NIST explains it. You ignore
the full context of the explanation. Either that or you are uninformed of the physics involved in caternary action and the NIST report. This is not my
Then explain the simple physics, because I can explain the simple physics that makes the sagging truss hypothesis nonsense. Want to go head to head
on that debate mate?
NIST does not explain it, if you think they do then that just shows the extent of your education. I'd like to hear YOU explain it and not just parrot
what NIST says.
truther questioning has so far been ignored. For 10 years....
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. .
Hmmm you must be using the debunker manual, the amount of time I've heard that same comment from OSers.
I believe it is you who keeps repeating the OS nonsense over and over.
You're not ignoring it though are you? Why are you hear if no one is paying attention? What is the point of you wasting your time trying to prop up
the official story when everyone, according to you, believes it?
Nope. It is the best explanation. Nothing else has been offered to challenge it to the rational.
It's the best explanation if you ignore the obvious. We are challenging it everyday, and you are failing.
HAHAHA... no you're not. Quotemining and strawman arguements are nothing of consequence. They are nothing but trolling, lol....
I have quoted nothing and made no strawmen, you must be confusing me with someone else.
the much lauded and asked for by truthers - new investigation. you forget that?
I'm not a truther. I am under no illusion that there will be another investigation. You generic assumptions are wrong.
Your quotemining and strawman questions .... backed by your insistence that they are legit... backed by your obvious trouble with physics
regarding caternary action of the sagging trusses proves this to be projection.
You have lost. And you continue losing, even though your opponent has left the field, hoisted the trophy, and is at the party......
Catenary (you can't even spell it right) action does not effect SAGGING trusses. There is a completely different set of physics working on a SAGGING
truss, than a chain or other rigid object that sags because of its design. A chain can pull on columns because added weight will put its force at the
connections. A truss that is sagging because of heat will simply sag more from the weight, it can not transfer that force to the connection. If it
could don't you think the 5/8" and 1" bolts would break before the massive columns? Were the connections not a weak point according to you, that
allowed the floors to pancake and not be effected by the resistance of those connections?
This is a lie, one of the agencies you appeal to...
The single-bolt connections in the framework of the World Trade Center popped and fell apart during the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, causing
the floors to collapse on top of each other, according to a new study. The analysis, conducted by a team of researchers from the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, concludes the bolts did not properly secure the Twin Towers' steel floor trusses, The New York Post reported Sunday.
Single bolt connection?
You are the one helping to spread lies mate.
You all come here claiming to understand physics because you appeal to authority that is lying to you, and you don't have the education to realise
edit on 5/22/2012 by ANOK because: (no reason given)