8.9 Sumatra Mega-Quake Validates 188-day cycle and Ley Lines AGAIN!

Maybe I can shed some light on this topic. After 188 tiring days of laboring on the computer I have mathematically determined that EVERY DAY IS 188 DAYS DISTANT FROM ANOTHER DAY!!! Can anybody refute that?


“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves…”

-- Bertrand Russell

Originally posted by MaxBlack
As I posted earlier today, the 13 day window that encompasses April 19 through May 1 is a time frame this year that clearly is broadcast in ritual terms to be a serious time frame to watch.

This is interesting:

Obama to address nation at 7:30PM ET from Afghanistan after arriving on unannounced visit
www.abovetopsecret.com...

In terms of your post, this event may signify some kind of wrapping up ceremony or culmination of something.

Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
www.foxnews.com...

President Obama has arrived in Afghanistan for a previously unannounced visit.

The president is in Afghanistan on the anniversary of Usama bin Laden's death.

Obama is expected to meet with Afghan President Hamid Karzai in Kabul and sign a partnership agreement.

Some pointless BS will run from his jowls like diarrhea I'm sure.

edit on 1-5-2012 by thisguyrighthere because: (no reason given)

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by this_is_who_we_are


The window is used to cover up for the fallacies of this claim. Nothing more, nothing less.

reply to post by truthseekr1111
I dont mean insulting the author, but I agreed with members against the 188-days method. As everyone else, I didnt see it's accurate. Correct me if I am wrong.

I am the one who predicted two consecutive biggest earthquakes at offshore of Honshu and NW Sumatra, and I knew another person also did predict these two earthquakes.

I maybe post my forecast here. If that's the case, then please join.

@thorforecaster Twitter.com/thorforecaster

reply to post by stereologist


why is it always the haters that provide zero work for anything and always have these lazy boring troll responses. i have never, not once, learned anything from a troll (no work).

I actually believe there is something to this idea. As the earth rotates around the sun, there are forces applied to it because of our north pole being locked to the north star location. I think there are other things that need to be considered in this theory but the theory can actually be valid. If we are going to learn we need to keep an open mind and examine the other variables that exist along with the theory. This cycle may only exist when the earth is heating or the ice melts from the poles. It could also be tied to a much larger cycle like the cycle we are entering where seismic and volcanic activity is starting to increase. It may be useful to consider that things are changing allowing this to be applicable for a hundred or more years.

I will not accept evidence from a closed system to be used on an open system where parameters are different. I will consider it after researching the situation but will not give existing knowledge dictatorship over things it does not actually apply to. Everything is considered in my mind and all things are on the table till they are shown not to apply. I tend to see things that most people can't, this makes life not as fun. I am not very spontaneous, I don't very often apply wrong evidence to a situation. I'll try to research this topic using all known forces and changes that apply

By the way, when is the next date going to be in the 188 cycle?

reply to post by rickymouse


I think it was October 16, 2012. It has passed. There was a mag 6.5 quake off costa rica on 10/24, and a 7.8 on 10/28 off of canada.....so a few days off. (not to mention the 7.4 off guatamala today).

I've got my money on the NMSZ as the next mega quake. Cali will have to wait.

reply to post by RevelationMedia

why is it always the haters that provide zero work for anything and always have these lazy boring troll responses. i have never, not once, learned anything from a troll (no work).

Who are the haters?

The point is that there is a claim here that turns out to be completely wrong. There is no 188 day cycle.

I can only suppose that you are referring to those that reject education as the haters. I can only suppose that you refer to those posting falsehoods such as the 188 cycle as being the trolls.

reply to post by rickymouse

As the earth rotates around the sun, there are forces applied to it because of our north pole being locked to the north star location.

The orientation of the Earth's spin will not change unless a force is applied to the Earth. Left alone the Earth would continue to point in the same direction.

where seismic and volcanic activity is starting to increase.

Although this is often claimed it is not true. Seismic activity and volcanism are not increasing or decreasing.

I will not accept evidence from a closed system to be used on an open system where parameters are different. I will consider it after researching the situation but will not give existing knowledge dictatorship over things it does not actually apply to. Everything is considered in my mind and all things are on the table till they are shown not to apply.

Science is not a closed system. If you think it is then you might want to learn about the scientific method.

reply to post by stereologist


I just read an article that was put out by some big European group of geological scientists specializing in Seismic and volcanic activities. Acording to the article the world is possibly entering a natural cycle where there will be increasing seismic and volcanic activity for quite a while. I'm talking hundreds or possibly thousands of years. They know these cycles exist from fossil and geological layers and have conferred that this may be starting now because they see an overall increase in the energy being released recently and a pattern is evolving.

I didn't bookmark this article, the commission is legit, I researched it but can't remember it's name to look it up. Seems that this cycle has nothing to do with global warming and they don't actually know exactly what causes this cycle, only that it exists. It will be interesting to see if these hundred or so specialists are right. The article could not say how the cycle unfolds because the evidence they are studying is not that accurate to know if it peaks right away or slowly progresses. I hope to see more info coming from this organization in the next couple of years. If this many specialists in the field see an increase in overall energy output I will believe them and not you Stereologist. I prefer to study the evidence or interpretations by qualified people if their interpretations are in line with the evidence

reply to post by rickymouse


Can you supply a link to the article?

There is a group of charlatans with these really silly looking things that look like bad art pieces and they claim that these are seismic stations. The group is run by a Russian guy as I recall and his site is full of photos that claim he is signing agreements with scientists all over the world.

The facts are that earthquake evidence is very limited. Individual faults have been studied, but there is little info on quakes worldwide. How many times have you read an article in the last couple of years where a quake revealed a new fault? As far as volcanoes goes the evidence is very clear that there is no increase since good global evidence has been collected - only about 50 years.

If this many specialists in the field see an increase in overall energy output I will believe them and not you Stereologist.

The worlds experts disagree with you. I side with them.

I prefer to study the evidence or interpretations by qualified people if their interpretations are in line with the evidence

You should do that.

reply to post by stereologist


Well, I can't find the article. I get my information a lot of time by going into the back door from other research articles using their evidence, then go into the evidence of the second or third deep articles. This sometimes gets me months ahead of the release of articles to the public. It also gets me to places where I am not authorized to be unless I find the first article and remember the sequence. I'll give this one to you for now but when the evidence is made public I will remind you.

Does any of this look like what you were searching for?

wiki article on ATROPATENA