reply to post by stereologist
Your problem is that you like to make crap up and tout it as proof. You make belief that whatever is in your mind is the truth and everything that
goes against such logic needs to disprove whatever skewed belief you already have implanted in your mind.
So basically you are bluffing. I figured that before I asked.
And basically you are a troll trying to derail a topic. That isn't the purpose of this topic. The other topic has many pages of discussion and three
11 minute videos on the theory. It isn't my theory. I have no reason to try to explain it to one ignorant person who doesn't want to take the time
of day to understand it themselves. If you choose to ignore how algebra works are you going to deny the theorems and require I teach you that too?
Stop being lazy and do some work yourself. I have done mine.
There you go admitting this so-called theory is crap.
There YOU go putting words in my mouth. This theory is not crap. In fact, since the theory has come to light, it has stood all tests placed against
it. The only things that are repeated over and over are the same boring arguments that people like you regurgitate in topics over and over again even
though people explain it too you quite clearly.
I said the theory is not perfect. There are a few imperfections in the past that have yet to be accounted for. So far, however, the theory has stood
its ground since it has been brought to peoples attentions. PROVE ME WRONG.
I'm not even going to touch on your numbered points because, ONCE AGAIN, you are showing your ignorance to the original theory and the points I
already stated. OF COURSE THE DAMN QUAKES ARE CHERRY PICKED - THE DAMN THEORY IS NOT ACCOUNTING FOR ALL QUAKES.
HOW HARD IS THIS FOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU TO UNDERSTAND?!
And damn it, there is no "fudge" factor. There is a matrix set of numbers. It is always THOSE NUMBERS. Allow me to repeat them again for your
consideration since this seems incredible difficult for you to grasp: 4 days. 8 days. 11 days. 15 days. 19 days. 23 days. Not a range of those
numbers. NOT 4 TO 23. Those EXACT NUMBER OF DAYS. Not more, not less. This is what people in science call a "data set". This is a set of days in
which events in the pasts have been shown to occurs, nearly ALWAYS, in those intervals.
reply to post by Chadwickus
I honestly don't know how many times anyone has to explain this, or when they do, it is so hard for people to grasp. As I said in my post above:
1. The 188-day theory does not account for ALL quakes whether they are 7+ or not. It accounts for the particular quakes that occur during that time.
The point of the theory in this regard is to show that every 188 days, and in the occurrence of the other proceeding days, there is some common factor
that is causing these quakes to happen.
THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT EVERY QUAKE IS CAUSED BY THAT SAME FACTOR. Quakes are caused by MANY underlying things - the 188-day quakes are only listing
the caused by one common denominator, a denominator that as of right now is unknown.
Allow me to paint this picture for you, since you also seem to be one who seems to be unable to grasp this concept. Maybe you can share it with all
A. We can all agree that earthquakes are caused by many things, yes?
B. Certain things happen at certain times, correct?
C. So we can assume that certain things occur, at certain times, that cause earthquakes, right.
OK, now taking this information - every 188 days, or 24 hour cycle periods, something occurs that causes a large earthquake. In fact, this something
occurs leading up to that day and leading away from that day for a 46 day period.
So what about all the other earthquakes you ask that are unaccounted for? Well here is the real KICKER - THEY ARE CAUSED BY SOMETHING ELSE.
Just like all the birds that die in the world don't die of old age, some get diseases, some are shot, some hit bad weather, and an infinite number of
causes. The same, as far as we know, is for earthquakes. The ONLY thing the 188-day theory is trying to say, and so far proving, is that in the time
frame there is a common causing factor that is causing STRONG earthquakes at that time.
That's it. That is that. Everyone who is regurgitating the same baseless points of "you didn't included this and that powerful quake at some other
time" or "you are just picking random dates" it making themselves look like fools who never read or understood the theory to begin with.
Read, understand, ask questions, and then make judgement. Most of all, deny ignorance. It is a quickly spreading disease on here.