It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Barcs
DNA has been around for some 2 billion + years, and it has evolved, not deteriorated over that time. The diversity of life on earth demonstrates that perfectly.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Barcs
DNA has been around for some 2 billion + years, and it has evolved, not deteriorated over that time. The diversity of life on earth demonstrates that perfectly.
Mutations do not add new information, it's a corruption of existing information and the offspring has a net loss.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Mutations do not add new information, it's a corruption of existing information and the offspring has a net loss.
Insertion (illustration)
An insertion changes the number of DNA bases in a gene by adding a piece of DNA. As a result, the protein made by the gene may not function properly.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by OzTiger
how everyone completely ignores your obvious logic.
It's not all all logical considering what brings about deformities with inbreeding today. The original humans had pure undeteriorated DNA strands.
Perhaps I have seen too many bad things in this world to believe that something divine is watching over us.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by OzTiger
Perhaps I have seen too many bad things in this world to believe that something divine is watching over us.
You're forgetting we are a wicked people and there is still a devil.
No! With respect that is the 'standard answer' - blame it on The Devil.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by OzTiger
No! With respect that is the 'standard answer' - blame it on The Devil.
No, that was half of my answer. We are WICKED people. We do wicked things. I'm not in the camp that blames everything on the devil, many is his fault, but goodness we humans are some sick twisted folks,
"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Barcs
www.AIG.org
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Barcs
www.AIG.org
Originally posted by kerazeesicko
Wouldn't there have to be man and female to produce the first human being so technically there is an Adam and Eve.
Most likely not the bible version..since that is a man made book built on myths.
Originally posted by FutureThinker
I copied this statement from the OPs link, Yahoo News
"According to Genesis, God created Adam and Eve as the first man and woman and all people are descended from them."
So, is the Church trying to cover thier butts, because from the statement above, all I get is that incest took place, and thats how we all got here, that seems to be what the story of Adam & Eve is saying.
How could we have been so stupid to believe that we all came from just two humans, does anybody else get this too.
Originally posted by Barcs
Of course Adam and Eve as true father and mother of the human race is false. It's pretty much understood by science that the homo sapien population never dipped below 2,000 at any given time. We can tell this based on our mapped genome. What the bible describes seems more like a genetic experimentation lab. Adam, Lillith and Eve were lab rats, but there were already thousands upon thousands of humans out there in the world at the time and probably Neanderthals as well. Part of me wonders if the garden of eden was actually intended to get Neanderthals to breed with homo sapiens to increase genetic diversity.
edit on 25-4-2012 by Barcs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by Barcs
Of course Adam and Eve as true father and mother of the human race is false. It's pretty much understood by science that the homo sapien population never dipped below 2,000 at any given time. We can tell this based on our mapped genome. What the bible describes seems more like a genetic experimentation lab. Adam, Lillith and Eve were lab rats, but there were already thousands upon thousands of humans out there in the world at the time and probably Neanderthals as well. Part of me wonders if the garden of eden was actually intended to get Neanderthals to breed with homo sapiens to increase genetic diversity.
edit on 25-4-2012 by Barcs because: (no reason given)
Eve's name would be Chavah, giver of life, now shekinah/holy spirit is also giver of life and comforter, also god is giver of life.
There had to be a first someone somewhere,
Originally posted by Garfee
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by Barcs
Of course Adam and Eve as true father and mother of the human race is false. It's pretty much understood by science that the homo sapien population never dipped below 2,000 at any given time. We can tell this based on our mapped genome. What the bible describes seems more like a genetic experimentation lab. Adam, Lillith and Eve were lab rats, but there were already thousands upon thousands of humans out there in the world at the time and probably Neanderthals as well. Part of me wonders if the garden of eden was actually intended to get Neanderthals to breed with homo sapiens to increase genetic diversity.
edit on 25-4-2012 by Barcs because: (no reason given)
Eve's name would be Chavah, giver of life, now shekinah/holy spirit is also giver of life and comforter, also god is giver of life.
There had to be a first someone somewhere,
Gargamel created Smurfette - does that make him a smurf god or just a creator?edit on 27-4-2012 by Garfee because: (no reason given)
Gargamel created Smurfette - does that make him a smurf god or just a creator?
Originally posted by Barcs
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Barcs
www.AIG.org
Yeah, a search on answersingenesis proves it. Come on. I'm looking for hard science, not a lying creationist website that has been debunked numerous times. Please cite me the science experiment that proves your claim, not a search on a site that's been proven false. Creationists literally have NOTHING to go by other than regurgitating false arguments from biased websites. Do some real research instead of blindly believing what you are told.