Russia Today: Addressing Some 9/11 Issues - Insider Trading

For Russia Today to cover this we have to admit the Information War is growing. As I understand it, 9/11 topics in the mainstream media are taboo. Good report for those interested in the 9/11 citizen based investigations.

It seems that Russia Today are starting to address the 9/11 issue. Its being suggsted on Russia Today that some people inside Washington were aware of the 9/11 attacks before they happened. This can be proved by the insider trading going on prior to the attack.

Keiser Report:

Max Keiser and co-host Stacy Herbert discuss Irish stoicism and social ostracism, boycotts and ponzis and the banking practices of Chuckie. In the second half of the show Max talks to independent journalist, Lars Schall, about his recently published investigation into insider trading around the 9/11 terrorist attack, as well as his pursuit of Germany’s elusive gold reserves.



Russia Today: Max Keiser - 9/11 Insider Trading

Do they mention who did the insider trading? The access to the markets is global.

reply to post by Cassius666


They mention the german central bankers along with a few others

The second half, 15 mins in, covers the 9/11 insider trading news.

Originally posted by Cassius666
Do they mention who did the insider trading? The access to the markets is global.

The exclusive investigation can be read here in this Asia Times article.

It is very interesting.

Oh, for crying out loud. This subject was investigated long ago. Both airlines had been putting out stories full of negative information in August of 2001. Several investor advisements had been sent out advising their clients to place options on the airlines. It was also pointed out that the number of options placed were inline with the numbers placed at several different times during 2001. In other words, RT has dusted off a long disproven theory because they know most folks have forgotten about the options and RT can generate more followers.

reply to post by vipertech0596


From Wiki

An episode broadcast in September 2011 featured an interview with comedienne Rosanne Barr who stated that her solution to the financial crisis was to "bring back the guillotine"

Quality sources.

The only thing financial she knows is where the cheapest rib joint is.
She's worse than Jessie Ventura because at least he can get air time.

Max is a bit of a nutter but he is often spot on when it comes to money.

The pricks at the CIA think the public brought the story that in todays age people can short airline for millions of $$$ and no one can find out who placed the bets.

Its bull# and the CIA were in on the 9/11 job with MOSSAD from day one

WWIII stared on 9/11 and americans are only just starting to see that they are as much a target of the zionist bankers as muslims are on the other side of the world.

Lets leave no stone unturned and have a full and open public investigation into the events of 9/11 and let the cards fall as they will.

reply to post by Master_007


If that were the case, then insider trading would be hard to monitor. However if you trade your account is tracked and if you get too lucky, you have to answer questions, unless you belong to the circle of people who get a pass on it.

reply to post by vipertech0596

Hey vipertech. Why, then would large foreign bank authorities conduct rare and expensive investigations of the pre-9/11 trading for their own purposes if you were able to shrug it off so convincingly?

If this is your true assessment, then you are misinformed about a number of things. However, I am of the mind that you don't really believe this. Your username, alone reveals the potential that your words are about as authentic as a fresh morning's AstroTurf.

What you don't see or consider is a correlation of things. When one rare occurrence happens followed by another, and the two are separately connected then the rarity is exponentially more rare.

50,000 shares of Stratasec where bought by Kirt and _ _ _ _ _ (can't recall their names) within a few days of 9/11. They are both Bush cousins. Now, as you will remember from statistical probability, this is a ping for insider trading.

Now consider the bets against the airlines and their numbers, and there again is a huge ping.

What cracked it open for me and left things with absolutely no uncertainty was the credit card transaction frenzy happening inside the twin towers after the first plane strike. The perpetrators acted in ways that indicated they were either willing to be caught, or believed that their footprints would be concealed. They did not act belligerently.

The problem for them was that roughly 400 hard-drives were recovered from the site and the data contained within recovered entirely. Of course, when the media questioned the FBI and other agencies over the years they always claimed that none had been recovered with anything salvageable.

reply to post by TyrannyNews

The problem for them was that roughly 400 hard-drives were recovered from the site and the data contained within recovered entirely. Of course, when the media questioned the FBI and other agencies over the years they always claimed that none had been recovered with anything salvageable.

Any proof to either of thoses assertions other than conspiracy websites?

reply to post by TheMindWar

It could be useful if the gloves came off with Russia Today reporting. There might be some hesitation, though. The suspicious Moscow apartment house bombings in 1999 got minimal questioning in US, and, symmetrically, in case of 9/11 Russia bought the official US explanation.

I thought the Illuminatti controlled both goverments anyways......US/Russia
The insider trading is obvious.
When the volume reaches into the thousands of times higher than normal, one does not have to go further......
9/11 HAD to be an inside job......The shear volume of information required to pull it off could not be other than from inside the heierarchy.......
There is no other way that ALL discrepancies in the Official Conspiracy theory can be accounted for........
If it looks like a duck, and walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, its a freakin duck!
And 9/11 was an inside job...............

reply to post by TyrannyNews


There's a lot wrong in your post. Stratesec is the name you're looking for, not Stratasec (which is an Australian defence company). It was not called Stratesec at the time and I can't find any evidence of the transactions you mention. I'm also not clear as to why they are suspicious - why you think it's a "ping". It certainly wasn't a very good bet as the company was delisted less than a year after 9/11.

I haven't investigated your other claims but I imagine they are equally fanciful.

reply to post by stirling

When the volume reaches into the thousands of times higher than normal, one does not have to go further......

Thousands?? You should lear something about the stock market before you parrot those other websites.

reply to post by TyrannyNews

If this is your true assessment, then you are misinformed about a number of things. However, I am of the mind that you don't really believe this. Your username, alone reveals the potential that your words are about as authentic as a fresh morning's AstroTurf.

See the funny part is, you are saying I AM misinformed..then you make your moronic, ill-informed statement about the two Bush cousins investing in SECURACOM.

See, Wirt Walker and Marvin Bush were on the board of directors of Securacom (now Stratsec, I believe) Anyway, the allegation that Wirt Walker was a Bush cousin originally popped up in a story by Margie Burns many years ago. And Ms. Burns in the interim, has said she was wrong about Mr Walker. A friend's wife's sister's cousin's aunt had told her he was related....Mr Walker, is not a cousin to, nor a member of, the Bush family. And Marvin, is not a cousin either. He is President George Bush's brother. Nevermind that Marvin Bush stepped down from the board and divested his holdings in June of 2000. Before his brother was even the GOP nominee to be President.

Then, the equally goofy statement about the banks spending the money to find out..........just HOW do you think we now KNOW that options were legitmately placed? Psst......there was an INVESTIGATION.......