posted on Jul, 8 2012 @ 08:11 PM
I think it should go without saying, that which ever PEOPLE you wind up killing throughout your travels in the whole post-societal-meltdown scenario
... I should think that it goes without saying that whatever people you kill, until you decide that they make up a valuable food source for your SELF
or for your fellow travellers, that THEIR meat should be considered as a source of dog food. I just don't know that it would be all that wise to
decide to bury them or cremate them, when you'd then have to seek out other food sources, and even dip further into your own reserves just to keep
your dog alive. Now, once you're past that little hurdle, you might worry about your dog, depending on the type of dog I suppose 'cause maybe
you're talking about a chihuahua - ha ha - but yeah IF your dog were big enough to pose a danger then you wouldn't want that dog to pose a threat to
you if it were to make associations between the people you're feeding to it, and YOU. The whole "taste of blood" argument. So yeah, in that case
you'd wanna prepare that human meat in some way, a way in which the taste and texture, smell of it's origins etc, is disguised. So again, you'd be
looking at cooking the meat, cleaning and butchering the corpses in the first place, etc. Whether or not you wanna butcher said people IN FRONT OF
your dog is yet another consideration. Whether or not, and more to the point HOW you'd want your dog involved in the killing of which people is yet
another. Because the whole "attack dog" scenario is something you'd wanna keep under control also. Which is to say, you can't have the dog jumping
in whenever you get in a tousle, and you can't have the dog jump in every time you get in a proper FIGHT either. It could get YOU hurt or worse, and
it could get the dog itself hurt or worse. It could completely compromise you to have the dog get in the middle of things, whether for the best of
intentions or not. So too, as many of you dog people will intuit, the dog could be a useful TOOL. A servant in a certain fashion. Whether or not you
make the types of distinctions whether or where the dog is superior or inferior to other people, and whom those people are, is something else you'd
have to decide. I know a lot of people would say "My dog is FAMILY." And for a lot of people, that's all they've got in terms of family. But those
who DO have loved ones, children etc, those of which who've considered all of the ultimatums, there are those who would consider the dog to be in the
very final analysis to be a walking form of food-stuffs. Livestock, essentially. In which case you'd be more careful about what they eat in order to
not contaminate the meat.
Aghhh, this window just dumped a whole other chunk of # I was typing. And I don't care to re-type it all. Fair enough, it's a lot to 'digest", as
it is. Ha ha. So I'll leave it at that for now. Blah blah blah. Ha ha.
-Sigh.