It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I have to ask something before the year moves much further and the Nibiru threads get totally out of hand...... Where is it? If this is coming in and is now well under a year from being our kissing cousin, then where is it?
So.. Where is it?
So I don't go by 'scientific laws' anymore. They're way too limiting to ones brain! Today's science mimics yesteryear myths.
Have you ever heard of the orphan planets?
If not, you may want to read up on that because that blows the 'planet-needing-a-star' myth right out of the water.
IMO gravity comes from within. The core. And works in conjunction with the electromagnetic field. The Sun plays into too only I'm not sure its part. Gravity does NOT come from a moon. That's caveman thinking. Especially when they find out (or rather: announce) the Moon isn't natural
Nibiru is a modern fiction? We might have the name wrong but I assure you the Annunaki have been around longer than our manifested planet has.
See? This is what science, school and religion does to perfectly good people. It churns out nothing but closed minded brainwashed obedient members of the flock.
I am not directing this to anyone specifically but if the wool fits, fleece it!
So if 'they' are still discovering planetary bodies within our OWN system (hell, NEXT to us) is it any wonder why this body might not have been found yet? I think some people regard scientists as magical beings who know all and see all.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Human_Alien
So if 'they' are still discovering planetary bodies within our OWN system (hell, NEXT to us) is it any wonder why this body might not have been found yet? I think some people regard scientists as magical beings who know all and see all.
Please read the article. It does not suggest a new planetary body. In fact the issue is there are small objects, very small objects in temporary orbits.
Learn the difference.
Spanish Astronomers Claim Dwarf Sun Beyond Pluto
viewzone2.com...
NASA Baffled by Unexplained Force Acting on Space Probes
www.space.com...
Does a Massive Planet Lurk in the Outer Solar System?
news.discovery.com...
Well I think you get the gist.
There's enough suggestion, hint and research lately that makes the WHOLE Planet X 'rumor' take on legs.
Now, if we mentioned this 5 years ago, we were laughed at. But now that science via the MSM is dripping out this information at an alarming rate, people have now accepted this possibility to the point of feeling: "it's no big deal. In fact, it's normal'
Unreal how the masses are led down that rabbit hole by a dangling carrot.
Since when does 'small object' negate 'new bodies'? It's not like this trojan asteroid was the size of a golf ball!!
The point is this has more to do with their capabilities (or lack thereof) for locating solar-bodies. It doesn't matter the size.
And if something is potentially hidden behind or within the Suns enormous brightness, it shouldn't surprise anyone that it hasn't been officially found.
We (scientists) are still working with primitive tools. Quantum physics shows that much of space- matter is hidden in different dimensions and light spectrum that we are unable to see.
And just to speculate: what if this binary sun and/or this phantom planet exist within that parallel? Maybe, Nibiru is invisible to us mortal Humans and is still affecting our 3D existence!?
Never say never!
The only thing I realize is there are 7 billion people on one planet with 7 billion opinions.
You and I don't agree and that is fine. In fact, that's preferred
I doubt anyone I care about is laughing at me but if you meant you (and felt compelled to pluralize yourself then) I should charge you a cover-charge!
Originally posted by Human_Alien
reply to post by DJW001
The only thing I realize is there are 7 billion people on one planet with 7 billion opinions.
You and I don't agree and that is fine. In fact, that's preferred
I doubt anyone I care about is laughing at me but if you meant you (and felt compelled to pluralize yourself then) I should charge you a cover-charge!
I'm laughing (WITH you) because you handle it well. IDK where the truth is either but find the alternative back-channels where dialog in opposition is allowed to be the BEST SCIENTIFIC sources. Way better than "peer-reviewed" journals and such where all the "peers" are paid by the same $powers with interests in more fear-mongering controls.
Is there a Nibiru or other large body near? IDK, But I won't be surprised. Its also interesting there's not much discussion of those 2 huge "stars" that keep showing up every night, brightest in the sky. Sattelites? Space ships? Cuchinas? WT# do I know, but those willing to be ridiculed are most interesting to listen too. Watch your back too... like Arther Schopenhauer said, revelation of truth goes through stages:
1. Ridiculed
2. Violent Opposed
3. Accepted as self-evident.
Self evident in proving a negative? Hardly. Like PROVE there's no "God". You can't. And there are many personal anecdotes to overwhelm your opinion, even if you get the whole communist government to go along with you (eg: Russia).
And my 1.2.3 items aren't my own, they're from Arthur Schopenhauer as I said - you can google that.
Instead you only prove yourself a SHILL offering "ridicule" toward me and others who might investigate.
Originally posted by reitze
...interesting there's not much discussion of those 2 huge "stars" that keep showing up every night, brightest in the sky. Sattelites? Space ships? Cuchinas? WT# do I know, but those willing to be ridiculed are most interesting to listen too.
Originally posted by camus154
reply to post by reitze
I'm more than a little amazed that someone who is preachy about "shills" and the (yawn) dangers of being ridiculed for not having an "open mind" has not put forth even the most cursory effort to investigate something as simple as the current night sky. As stereo already said, the two bright stars you're undoubtedly referencing are Jupiter and Venus; they've been spectacular night time viewing objects for some months now and a quick trip over to Astronomy or Sky and Telescope would have readily put your speculations to rest.
In the future I would heartily recommend such elementary measures before jumping to any far-fetched and entirely unsupported theories as alternative explanations.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by reitze
The fact of the matter is that there is no new planet sized mass within 320AU. The evidence is completely against it.
I'm laughing (WITH you) because you handle it well. IDK where the truth is either but find the alternative back-channels where dialog in opposition is allowed to be the BEST SCIENTIFIC sources. Way better than "peer-reviewed" journals and such where all the "peers" are paid by the same $powers with interests in more fear-mongering controls.
Is there a Nibiru or other large body near? IDK, But I won't be surprised. Its also interesting there's not much discussion of those 2 huge "stars" that keep showing up every night, brightest in the sky. Sattelites? Space ships? Cuchinas? WT# do I know, but those willing to be ridiculed are most interesting to listen too.
Watch your back too... like Arther Schopenhauer said, revelation of truth goes through stages:
1. Ridiculed
2. Violent Opposed
3. Accepted as self-evident.
I for one have had many technology concepts accelerate form 1 to 3 bypassing most of the violence via "getting the word out"... that takes "Jesus balls" and well articulated information.
As this thread is getting a bit old and a bit deep I for 1 would appreciate a summary post - putting your assessment together of what you've learned in support/opposition to your OP.