It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RockLobster
reply to post by lunarasparagus
Are you kidding , is any one going to show me the evidence of this extreme damage before trying to argue about it ?
Why cant you grasp the fact that i beleive more than one person lied about "9/11" ?
Originally posted by lunarasparagus
Originally posted by RockLobster
reply to post by lunarasparagus
Are you kidding , is any one going to show me the evidence of this extreme damage before trying to argue about it ?
Why cant you grasp the fact that i beleive more than one person lied about "9/11" ?
You ignored my question. On what have you based your assessment of the damage to WTC7 and is it more credible than the collective eye-witness testimonies of experienced FDNY officers?
Originally posted by RockLobster
Quotes would be nice , because i do not recall anyone claiming the NYFD blew them up.
Yeah , and what about those brave firemen who were speaking of bombs going off and blowing walls out infront of them ? ........ sick ? pfft , get a grip kid.
Originally posted by RockLobster
]
i did not ignore your question , hence the reply
And yes , i believe that my knowledge and experience in demolition is more credible than the experienced FDNY officers that you insist on quoting. Do you have a problem with that ?
how about that evidence ? do i need to ask for it in another language ?edit on 8-4-2012 by RockLobster because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by RockLobster
Another homework assignment for you. Take your dictionary and look up the word "imply". After that look up the word "quote". Then write a short essay about how these words are different. Good luck.
Originally posted by RockLobster
reply to post by lunarasparagus
The fact that , get this , there is NO evidence .... of severe structural damage to tower 7.
So , why do you beleive there was severe structural damage ? because of what a few people with badges said ?
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by RockLobster
Since there is no evidence, it is something truther must be really fond of. Oh wait, there is evidence of the damage to WTC7, those photos has already been posted. Well then I guess its of no use to truthers.
ps. before you get all confused by my absence again, I am going to sleep now.edit on 8-4-2012 by -PLB- because: (no reason given)