It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by VoteJillSteinKatSwift2012
How about a portion of the 99% movement air TV ads airing people to accept universal federal government funded health care as a way to "encourage" people to be healthy and to vote for Jill Stein and Kat Swift and to remind people of how much of a failure the Obama Administration really is since Obama hasn't provided universal federal government funded health care?edit on 19-3-2012 by VoteJillSteinKatSwift2012 because: I want to post additional info.
Originally posted by freethinker123
I agree with you. I really believe its high time that action is taken on this issue. I find it really sad that nobody from the gun supporting camp has the courage to come forward with any solutions. In a responsible, functioning democracy (or Republic or however they want to describe the US) members of a group would look for solutions ie by isolating a tiny minority of gun owners, making it harder for those irresponsible, crazy or criminal to get hold of legal weapons.
I find it really sad that nobody from the gun supporting camp has the courage to come forward with any solutions
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by freethinker123
I agree with you. I really believe its high time that action is taken on this issue. I find it really sad that nobody from the gun supporting camp has the courage to come forward with any solutions. In a responsible, functioning democracy (or Republic or however they want to describe the US) members of a group would look for solutions ie by isolating a tiny minority of gun owners, making it harder for those irresponsible, crazy or criminal to get hold of legal weapons.
How would you then keep them from getting hold of illegal weapons - or shifting their weapon of choice to something else, like fertilizer or vaseline? (Yes, you can make vaseline explode, and no, I'm not going to tell you how).
What about gasoline? Lighter fluid? ball peen hammers?
What about gasoline? Lighter fluid? ball peen hammers?
How would you then keep them from getting hold of illegal weapons
Originally posted by Cosmic911
I have read through your previous posts to help me determine the seriousness of the questions you posed in this post. Perhaps "seriousness" is not the most accurate word. Are you suggesting we address these items because they have been implicated in crimes? Are they rhetorical questions?
(There are regulations on fertilizers so that has been addressed)
What about gasoline? Lighter fluid? ball peen hammers?
How would you then keep them from getting hold of illegal weapons
The simple answer is...you don't...you can't. You can minimize it, but as long as there is a demand, there will always be a supply, legitimately or otherwise.
Originally posted by whisperindave
reply to post by xuenchen
OK, so since when is a good idea like getting kids to think guns are uncool, some kind of conspiracy??? I think guns are uncool. They are weapons. They KILL people. That's not cool. It might be a necessity and your right to own one might be just that, a right (which also bears a GREAT and heavy RESPONSIBILITY) But it is not COOL. And the Attorney Holder was right, you got to brainwash these kids from the brainwashing the media and the NRA have done previously. That means yes, making guns seem uncool. Of course it will NEVER happen because so many BAD people want to sell guns to kids so they can do BAD things. It's all about the Benjamins. So what the heck is this doing on ATS?
And the Attorney Holder was right, you got to brainwash these kids from the brainwashing the media and the NRA have done previously
An old saying where I come from is "locks are for honest people". Likewise with regulations - they only work against people who choose to obey them, which persons are unlikely to go on killing sprees in the first place.
Originally posted by whisperindave
I think guns are uncool. They are weapons. They KILL people. That's not cool.
It might be a necessity and your right to own one might be just that, a right (which also bears a GREAT and heavy RESPONSIBILITY) But it is not COOL. And the Attorney Holder was right, you got to brainwash these kids from the brainwashing the media and the NRA have done previously.
That means yes, making guns seem uncool. Of course it will NEVER happen because so many BAD people want to sell guns to kids so they can do BAD things. It's all about the Benjamins. So what the heck is this doing on ATS?
Originally posted by Aliensdoexist
reply to post by xuenchen
Guns don't kill people, people kill people and that is why the government should "Ban People". Seriously though if guns were outlawed the only ones that would have guns would be cops and criminals.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by freethinker123
Not just a maybe though is it? The fact is that the vast majority of guns used in this type of crime are obtained legally.
Which "type of crime"? I'd have to take issue with the notion that legally obtained firearms are used more often in crimes than illegally obtained ones.
What you mean to say is that you wouldn't change your mind even if evidence contradicted your opinion isn't it?
No, what I meant to say was what I said, and furthermore no one has presented any such contradictory evidence, nor have I presented any "evidence". Opinion is not evidence. I'm willing to entertain the evidence, but all actual evidence presented in the thread so far has been in favor of firearms, and more specifically it pointed out and broke down, by the numbers, how vanishingly less likely one is to be involved in an "accidental shooting" than to emply a frirearm in genuine defense.
A few points, all anecdotal or subjective: While an "accidental shooting" is not a crime I believe there is no such thing as an "accidental shooting": Those are more properly called "negligent discharges", because they are the result of negligence with an intentionally pulled trigger. Triggers do not, and never have, pulled themselves.
Be honest, even if murder rates from gun shooting through use of legally procured weapons by said crazies went up by 1000% it wouldn't bother you, or would it?
It would bother me, but not in the way that you think, It would bother me that so many people willingly walked to slaughter rather than defend themselves. On the other hand, Darwin takes over in such circumstances. The crazies live on to breed more, and the suicidal people with the victim mentality contribute no further genes to the pool. Then you get a society which we are dangerously on the verge of - the crazies multiply to the point that they run the show, and of course the first thing they want to do is disarm the rest - to make of us all victims and to make their job easier and safer, without the possibility of getting shot themselves.
How on earth can your children be armed if they are at school when some crazed teenager who got the weapon from his uncle's drawer decides to take his rage out against his old school?
They have been taught to think, to react, and to employ strategy against the miscreant. Those are PRIMARY weapons. Secondarily, they have been taught to use a wide variety of implements in combination with those strategies to maximize impact. They have been taught not to freeze like a deer in the headlights and just wait to see if the miscreant is really going to shoot. he IS. Do something about that, don't just wait for the fire plume.
Then, after the dust settled, that uncle better hope the cops find him before I do. I have no qualms about thinning crazies and criminally negligent people from the gene pool.
I don't know where you live but in the US school shootings are higher than any other country in the world.
I live in the US. Our redwood trees are higher than in any other country in the world, too. That doesn't mean we have any redwoods in my area, either.
And there is no correlation between the availability of weapons on the legal marketplace and school shootings?
No, none whatsoever. Availability to miscreants attributes to other factors than "the marketplace". In your example above it's criminal negligence - firearms must be stored by law in a safe manner around here, and failure to do so is a criminal matter. Criminals will arm themselves some how, whether you make it illegal or not. They will either go to alternate weapons, or create their own underground marketplace, or both. The problem is not the implements, it is the criminals who use them.
Originally posted by Cosmic911
I couldn't disagree more with this idea of "brainwashing" kids. Call it whatever you want but its lying and presenting an inaccurate truth to impressionable kids. We want kids who can critically think when they need to; make good decisions in life. We'll never achieve this by brainwashing them. But educating them about the dangers of firearms is the best idea. Taking kids to a county medical examiner's office is one way of educating them. Present the dangers to them in a concrete and adult medium is the only way to give them the tools to think critically to make good decisions. Kids play with guns because they seem "cool" to them. They are a mystery to them. They are interesting to them. But if you educate your child about the firearm and make it less of a mystery it becomes like everything else in the mind of teenager; here and gone in 60 seconds. Take away the mystery. Answer the questions. Get them to respect the weapon. Put the fear of God into them. Make them respect it, understand it, allow them to conquer the challenge that a gun represents.
Originally posted by Cosmic911
reply to post by nenothtu
Great post! I do agree.
An old saying where I come from is "locks are for honest people". Likewise with regulations - they only work against people who choose to obey them, which persons are unlikely to go on killing sprees in the first place.
That's what we say of gun control laws...its almost as if the politicians who make these laws don't realize this. I call this "Feel-Good Legislation." We have a lot of senseless and stupid feel-good legislation in New York State. It seems our politicians have perfected it.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by freethinker123
I agree with you. I really believe its high time that action is taken on this issue. I find it really sad that nobody from the gun supporting camp has the courage to come forward with any solutions. In a responsible, functioning democracy (or Republic or however they want to describe the US) members of a group would look for solutions ie by isolating a tiny minority of gun owners, making it harder for those irresponsible, crazy or criminal to get hold of legal weapons.
How would you then keep them from getting hold of illegal weapons - or shifting their weapon of choice to something else, like fertilizer or vaseline? (Yes, you can make vaseline explode, and no, I'm not going to tell you how).
OK this question will allow me to ask you a question in turn so I can test your honesty and to see how clued up you are. Do you agree with me that the argument used by some of those that agree with you is nonsense - ie that those who carry out these shootings would use knives instead
Before you agree with them, think about the profiles of some of these that have carried out school shootings. I'm willing to bet that some of those people would not have carried out those crimes at all. Its certainly not the same stabbing somebody to death as it is to execute them. Nor is it half as easy, as there is every chance somebody will succeed in disarming the perpetrator. Finally, once you have a plan and a gun, thats it, theres no going back. A knife, or other smaller weapon can mean an opportunity to retreat at the last moment with nobody knowing what was going to happen. But hell yeah, you can just tell me there is no evidence to suggest that. And I'll just tell you there is no evidence to the contrary...
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by Aliensdoexist
reply to post by xuenchen
Guns don't kill people, people kill people and that is why the government should "Ban People". Seriously though if guns were outlawed the only ones that would have guns would be cops and criminals.
And everyone else would be at the mercy of those two. Not a pleasant proposition.
Originally posted by freethinker123
'This type of crime' means the type of crime we have been discussing ie school shootings or instances of some crazy going on the rampage. You can take issue with it, but the fact (go check if you don't believe me) is that the majority of these crimes are comitted with legal weapons and not weapons obtained 'under the counter' or through criminal connections etc.
Yes, agree that you are willing to entertain yourself with the evidence, but you are unwilling to admit that no evidence would change your opinion anyway. It matters not a jot what evidence has been presented in this thread, we are not judges in a court of law, what matters is the existing evidence in the public realm.
And hold back with the amateur dalliances into Darwinism will you? Its commonly agreed by psychologists that around 80% of behaviour is environmental and 20% is hereditry. I doubt very much that the crazies will breed crazy children. And you call those that don't wish to carry suicidal?
Didn't understand what you bit about training your kids had to do with my question though.