It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Santorum jumps the shark. Pledges to make porn illegal

page: 5
58
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 11:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by SaturnFX

And..play the game of attracting a male. what does that mean to you?


It depends on whether you're trying to attract a sex partner or long-term mate.


is anyone whom doesn't look like some dumpster diving bum or a nun = "skank"?


Looking presentable is important to me. Look at all the girls in the "slut walks", for example. Most look like unkempt slobs who have no concern for their appearance.


And..what is the word for men whom are doing exactly the equal of them skanky women? makes them a skank also, right?


They are sometimes referred to as "pigs", or traditionally "playboys", which had a negative connotation.


If your 16 years old boy and a virgin, you start to become ridiculed, if your 16 and a girl whom is not a virgin, you become ridiculed


I don't know how old you are, but young girls who are not virgins don't get ridiculed by most.


You can be sexually active and not a sexist, or you can be a priest/nun and be a total sexist.


You totally missed the point. Women these days are reduced to their mere physical existence. Many women who frequently engage in casual sex are the stereotypical western materialistic, airheaded feminist type that has nothing to offer besides her body. It's no wonder so many men have a negative view of women.


sexists see the roles of man and women as different..women cannot do what men do simply out of moral decision by men...this is sexism.


I really don't care what you think is "sexist". Traditional gender roles are based in biology and the choices of men and women themselves.

There are many women who claim to like porn just to please or give in to the men they are with. Not saying that's the case with all the women you were with.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 11:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by RicFlair
The Republican party is wasting so much time and money on the bonebags they believe can run an entire country.


He can run the country...
Right back to the 17th century...off a cliff...into the sun...take your pick on how to finish the sentence..



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 11:30 PM
link   
And yet he blamed the 'media' for the Catholic Church scandal of pedophilia! You see, Catholics can do no wrong. They "Own" morality.
There was no condemnation of these filthy child rapist priests, only of the media who brought it to people's attention.

You hate the idea of Sharia law?
You know Santorum is only on step away. You're one vote away from being stoned for coveting your neighbor's slaves.

I thought the conservatives liked capitalism? So a $10Billion a year industry is suddenly bad?
Let's see:
* Porn doesn't release drugs that kill people with side effects
* Porn doesn't spill oil into fragile coastal ecosystems
* Porn doesn't insist on unnecessary medical procedures make money (well, there's the boobs, but you know what I mean)
* Porn doesn't suppress conflicting technologies
* Porn doesn't reduce the middle class to slavery
* Porn didn't lobby for deregulation to allow them to perform previously illegal acts
* Porn didn't actively hide pedophilia rings within the Catholic Church
* Porn doesn't regularly bankrupt farmers
Yep, sounds like a bad thing to me.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 11:35 PM
link   
Honestly there is a chance he will become president. Since there are 4 contenders, all taking delegates, there is a chance that Romney won't have enough to become the official nominee without help from either Santorum or Gingrich. Gingrich could make a deal with Santorum in exchange for his delegates, thus making Santorum the Republican nominee. That would be a nightmare scenario because there is enough discontent with Obama to warrant any republican candidate a threat.

Let's say such a thing does happen: Obama VS Santorum, Obama loses because people mindlessly vote against him, we're stuck with a retard for president. Then again, perhaps an idiot would better represent the American people than an educated, well spoken man. Takes a 'tard to praise a 'tard.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 11:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Charmed707
 


Your planet sounds absolutely dreamy.
and I want to emphasize dream.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 11:40 PM
link   
reply to post by LErickson
 


What did I say that's not realistic?



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 11:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by Annee

Originally posted by Danbones
he seems to be Ok with recent de criminalization of beastiality in the baraks
(it was approved 93 7 in the senate)
i think your porn is safe
I think the criminalization of hardcore porn might lead to some very unhealthy staring at goats


I know people love to use this as an argument.

But - its really pretty lame.

Yes - - beastiality was attached to Don't Ask Don't Tell - - - and when DADT was eliminated - - - so was the attachment beastiality.

Big Deal.


yes, it is a big deal
the only time votes actually get counted now
is when it doesn't count

Porn and mangoatsex in the barracks, and gays in the military, etc are all just totally insignificant distractions from
the vote fraud in the primaries, and congress just being told they don't count because obama gets his mandate for ww(n) from the UN...a foreign body in control of the US government...a defacto COUP by a foreign power
in short
the republic has just been raped and murdered and left for dead on the side of the road...
(hense my post on page one)

but a sex porn gay show creates a nice little distraction that allows for a little more necrophiliac rape of the stench filled decomposing bodypolitic....
get it while its hot!..
there is still a little bailout money oozing out onto the ground from the multiple contusions

perhaps I should have stated the obvious more obviously...
but what is the fun in that?
just as many people have eyes to see with either way






edit on 16-3-2012 by Danbones because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 11:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Charmed707

Originally posted by SaturnFX

And..play the game of attracting a male. what does that mean to you?


It depends on whether you're trying to attract a sex partner or long-term mate.

You know...I have never, ever made any type of advance towards a woman with the prospect of marrying her initially. I go because my motivations are..."pretty...I will talk to her". Sometimes it ended after a few weeks, a night, or many years.
If someone asked me if I was going to talk to the woman over there because I wanted simply a sex partner, or a long term mate...I would say..."yes". See where it leads sort of thing.




is anyone whom doesn't look like some dumpster diving bum or a nun = "skank"?


Looking presentable is important to me. Look at all the girls in the "slut walks", for example. Most look like unkempt slobs who have no concern for their appearance.

I have no idea what a "slut walk" is...
...
will probably google it later mind you...sounds like good cardio if anything. but, who decides what looks good and what looks slutty anyhow?
In the middle east, if a woman is not covered head to toe with only eyes showing, she is tramping around all slutty.
Does that mean your mother is a slut for not wearing a burka?

I think personally people should dress appropriately. If your shopping, casual. if your at work, business, if your at the beach, whatever you don't want tan lines on, and if your clubbing or the like, get your sexy on.



You can be sexually active and not a sexist, or you can be a priest/nun and be a total sexist.


You totally missed the point. Women these days are reduced to their mere physical existence. Many women who frequently engage in casual sex are the stereotypical western materialistic, airheaded feminist type that has nothing to offer besides her body. It's no wonder so many men have a negative view of women.

You see women reduced to their mere physical existence.
Don't generalize the world based on your perceptions.
A woman whom bakes a lot, to me, is not a baker and nothing more...a woman whom is constantly fiddling with her looks is not just some piece of meat..people are complex, and simply put, if you cant figure that out, then it really doesn't matter what they dress or act like, you will use simple boxes anyhow.

Yes, some women, and men, are caught up almost exclusively in the superficial...so...doesn't stop me from eating. Let them persue their own happiness...in a few years, they will get wrinkles and develop more meaningful attributes.
Hell, in my teens and 20s, I was all about looking like a greek god...glad I did, but I was far more than just physical...yet if someone seen me without knowing me, they would have potentially thought I was just a wannabe stud.



sexists see the roles of man and women as different..women cannot do what men do simply out of moral decision by men...this is sexism.


I really don't care what you think is "sexist". Traditional gender roles are based in biology and the choices of men and women themselves.

At times like these, its good to employ actual definitions of words:
sex·ism (skszm)
n.
1. Discrimination based on gender, especially discrimination against women.
2. Attitudes, conditions, or behaviors that promote stereotyping of social roles based on gender.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 11:48 PM
link   
I think the pressure finally got to Rick, and his comments as of late have been a telling sign of how well he deals with pressure. Certainly the type of man I want running the nation that polices the world at the expense of it lower class in blood and coin.

Speaking of unwinable wars, if you thought the war on drugs was a waste of time, coin, and prison space while training those that felt so helpless they fell into a drug habit into hardened criminals, then just imagine the "War on Pornography".

It'll make prohibition look like a little league warm up to the World Series.

I suppose it's a good thing then that the GOP has zero chance of winning the election. Though, either way, R or D, the government grows, and as it does, it grows more paranoid.

Instead of wasting the vast amount of resources it takes to monitor every time a citizen turns on their t.v. or washes their dishes (related to another post, my apologizes, but most all on these forums know about all this rot.), they could actually spend some of that time and coin to improving the quality of life for it's citizens. A good first step would be to let us watch a lil' t&a.

A sexually repressed culture is a culture of the dark ages. We need freedom of the mind and soul to create. Repression leads to depression. Depression leads to rebellion. If the system truely wanted their sheep in line, they wouldn't be so quick to deny us luxeries. But I suppose TPTB don't have the time to read Animal Farm with all the billions they're sucking out of the common person's wallet every day a dime at a time.

Damn pigs...



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 11:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by DestroyDestroyDestroy
perhaps an idiot would better represent the American people than an educated, well spoken man. Takes a 'tard to praise a 'tard.


We get whatever we deserve. I do believe this
If voters don't bother considering who they vote for, and do..not even digging, but just stop texting for a half second to look at someone...then yes, they...we deserve a big messy Santorum all over us.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 11:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by Charmed707


The only women who do are lesbians or bisexual- not a "lot" of women.



You are a bit out of touch - aren't you?

Or do you fear watching 2 women means you are Lesbian?



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 11:57 PM
link   
I used to have an "anybody but Romney" attitude... until I started learning more about Santorum--the guy who appears to qualify for unprecedented levels of douchebaggery.

At this point, in all seriousness, I no longer believe that Obama can be defeated. There just isn't going to be a strong enough opponent for him.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 11:58 PM
link   
Just a question here,can anyone tell me what springs to mind seeing his 2 sons?Me and my partner said the same thing,wonder if anyone else thought it too?



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 12:02 AM
link   
edit
edit on 17-3-2012 by David9176 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 12:13 AM
link   
How would one fap when wife doesn't give any loving? The future looks dead. Time to use the good ol brain and imagine something.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 12:17 AM
link   
He's just upset! This is his form of retaliation because of what his name means in the Urban Dictionary



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 12:41 AM
link   
reply to post by Annee
 


You sound like an ashamed homosexual.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 12:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by Charmed707
reply to post by Annee
 


You sound like an ashamed homosexual.


LOL


Just celebrated 22nd wedding anniversary with hubby 21 years younger then me.

If you think I am or ashamed of Homosexuals - - you haven't read many of my posts. But I know you have.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 12:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by SaturnFX

You know...I have never, ever made any type of advance towards a woman with the prospect of marrying her initially.


...but you can get an indication of what she's looking for if she's dressed a certain way.


In the middle east, if a woman is not covered head to toe with only eyes showing, she is tramping around all slutty.


There's a clear line when it comes to dressing in a sexual and non-sexual manner.


You see women reduced to their mere physical existence.
Don't generalize the world based on your perceptions.


You're being naive about western culture. Men's sexual attributes are not displayed even half as much as women's are. Just look at modern TV and movies- many women are there merely to sexually titillate. Many are considered to be a more 'serious' actress if they are willing to do nude scenes while men don't have this pressure and are rarely seen in full-frontal nude scenes.


Hell, in my teens and 20s, I was all about looking like a greek god...glad I did, but I was far more than just physical...yet if someone seen me without knowing me, they would have potentially thought I was just a wannabe stud.


I'm not talking about physical attractiveness. I'm talking about how our society objectifies women.


At times like these, its good to employ actual definitions of words:
sex·ism (skszm)
n.
1. Discrimination based on gender, especially discrimination against women.
2. Attitudes, conditions, or behaviors that promote stereotyping of social roles based on gender.


That right there is why the very notion of 'sexism' is a joke.


edit on 3/17/2012 by Charmed707 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 01:01 AM
link   
reply to post by Annee
 


I should have added "or bisexual". Many feminists will try to hide their attraction to women as not to feed into the 'lesbian' stereotype attached to feminists.



new topics

top topics



 
58
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join