Santorum jumps the shark. Pledges to make porn illegal

page: 6
57
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 01:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by Charmed707
reply to post by Annee
 


I should have added "or bisexual". Many feminists will try to hide their attraction to women as not to feed into the 'lesbian' stereotype attached to feminists.


Actually I'm not. Had plenty of opportunities - - but I don't swing that way.

Two men - - now that's a different story.

You're really trying hard though
- - - its funny that you call other people naive.
edit on 17-3-2012 by Annee because: (no reason given)




posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 01:07 AM
link   
reply to post by Annee
 


Heterosexuals don't get turned on by members of the same sex.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 01:50 AM
link   
i hate santorum with a passion, but the porn industry today is absolutely vile, compared to 30 years ago. i think that would be a good thing to attempt to rid the world of it.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 01:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by jazzguy
i hate santorum with a passion, but the porn industry today is absolutely vile, compared to 30 years ago. i think that would be a good thing to attempt to rid the world of it.


Sounds like you may be spending too much money on porn?

I don't like it( wasting so much money )so it should be banned. The American way.

Peace
edit on 17-3-2012 by spav5 because: (no reason given)


And also..how do you know how vile it is...unless you are also spending too much time watching it.
edit on 17-3-2012 by spav5 because: (no reason given)


Sorry for so many edits but..come on you can critique the then and now of porn..and you are calling for a ban..makes me laugh. Unless you are being sarcastic..I believe that you are spending way too much time and money on porn.

Peace again
edit on 17-3-2012 by spav5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 01:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by jazzguy
i hate santorum with a passion, but the porn industry today is absolutely vile, compared to 30 years ago. i think that would be a good thing to attempt to rid the world of it.


How is it vile today - - but not 30 years ago?

I don't think you can make an open statement like that without an explanation.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:03 AM
link   
47.3% of the population admits to viewing porn on the Internet on a regular basis. 52.6% lie and say they don't. Congrats to Santorum for alienating 99.9% of the population
Of course this law against porn that he wants to pass will not apply to politicians.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:06 AM
link   
I honestly did not think he could have made himself look like more of an idiot.

If anyone votes for him, it shows how out of touch they are with the world. I'm speechless, I cannot believe a man like him is a possibility for a future President.

Please, world end. I'm tired of all of this.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by SavedOne
47.3% of the population admits to viewing porn on the Internet on a regular basis. 52.6% lie and say they don't. Congrats to Santorum for alienating 99.9% of the population
Of course this law against porn that he wants to pass will not apply to politicians.


Plus..one persons porn is another persons statue of David.

I do not know one person that supports him.

Does anyone here know anyone that supports him? Just curious.

Peace



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:15 AM
link   
We should take Santorum's approach to this.

Ask a plant...



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:16 AM
link   
It will so never happen. The industry makes way 2 much money. lol



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:18 AM
link   
All the disdain for Santorum because he is a man of faith. He has moral
character and isn't afraid tell the nation what he believes. Why do you
say...God bless you? There is a benefit in following God.

Establishment's Romney believes...government wise, see below. I'll share it, Mitt's Mormonism is not Christian, frightening, this is too.

Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber in October:

The Obama administration may have relied much more heavily on Romney’s Massachusetts healthcare legislation as a blueprint for Obamacare than was previously believed.

White House visitor logs obtained by NBC News revealed that three of Romney’s healthcare advisers had up to a dozen meetings with senior administration officials, including one in the Oval Office presided over by President Barack Obama.

“They really wanted to know how we can take that same approach we used in Massachusetts and turn that into a national model,” MIT economist and Romney healthcare adviser Jon Gruber told NBC.


Romney = Obama.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by Afterthought
He's off his rocker.
It has been shown in the past that rapes and sexual assaults sky rocket when porn is not available.

If he was only concerned about cracking down on child pornography and violent S&M, I'd be OK with this. ALL porn? I don't think that's a very good idea at all.


I read his post and i agree with him. Hes saying we need to limit a child's access to porn on the internet.Because if we dont they become screwed up as adults. Im checking to see if his statistic that The average age of first exposure to hard-core, Internet pornography is now 11. If true thats is a real problem.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by colbe
All the disdain for Santorum because he is a man of faith. He has moral
character and isn't afraid tell the nation what he believes. Why do you
say...God bless you? There is a benefit in following God.


No dude, the disdain for Santy is because he wants to legislate his faith and morals..he want his personal views on a individual connection with the universe to be legally enforced to everyone else.

I am a consenting adult.
Explain to me why I, a adult, cannot watch other consenting adults have intercourse. Explain to me why this choice should be ripped from me by a politician...that they should literally come into my bedroom, and remove anything the government deems naughty from my personal property...

If he is willing to rip your personal liberties on this, what else will he do to you personally because he finds it morally objectionable?


Obama 2012

Change we can beli...actually, screw that..
new slogan "look at the alternative"



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by dragonridr

Originally posted by Afterthought
He's off his rocker.
It has been shown in the past that rapes and sexual assaults sky rocket when porn is not available.

If he was only concerned about cracking down on child pornography and violent S&M, I'd be OK with this. ALL porn? I don't think that's a very good idea at all.


I read his post and i agree with him. Hes saying we need to limit a child's access to porn on the internet.Because if we dont they become screwed up as adults. Im checking to see if his statistic that The average age of first exposure to hard-core, Internet pornography is now 11. If true thats is a real problem.


Heh, thats 3 years older than my first exposure
pre-net days. ahh hustler mags, how fun you were to sneak a peak at in my friends dads basement.

Anyhow, I heard they invented something over in china that monitors what your child looks at on the net. I think it is called "Parents" or something. not sure..may have to google it...but something about a couple of older people..and something about acknowledging the kids existence or something...donno you know how weird those asians are...what will they think of next.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:37 AM
link   
reply to post by SaturnFX
 


Hustler is not considered hard core porn. looking at there first magazine at a 11 and being introduced to hard core porn or two very different things.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:43 AM
link   
Pornography causes a lot of problems, I'll admit, but I have a problem when it comes to the government legislating morality. It doesn't work because not everyone has the same morality. It's immoral for unrelated men and women to congregate according to Allah/muhammad, so there are many laws in Islamic states that try to force people to be moral. Of course it seems barbaric to require women to have a guardian when they leave the house and we, Americans, would never have such a law..... but of course it starts somewhere.

An injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere.

If a Christian Pres. can set policy according to his beliefs, what's to stop a secular President from doing the same?
Keep America free. Unless it infringes on others rights and wellbeing. Sure you might get HIV, damn your soul, and disappoint your mom by being in the porn industry, but at least it was your choice.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by SaturnFX

Originally posted by colbe
All the disdain for Santorum because he is a man of faith. He has moral
character and isn't afraid tell the nation what he believes. Why do you
say...God bless you? There is a benefit in following God.


No dude, the disdain for Santy is because he wants to legislate his faith and morals..he want his personal views on a individual connection with the universe to be legally enforced to everyone else.

I am a consenting adult. Explain to me why I, a adult, cannot watch other consenting adults have intercourse. Explain to me why this choice should be ripped from me by a politician...that they should literally come into my bedroom, and remove anything the government deems naughty from my personal property...

If he is willing to rip your personal liberties on this, what else will he do to you personally because he finds it morally objectionable?


Obama 2012

Change we can beli...actually, screw that..
new slogan "look at the alternative"


Saturn, hi..., I care, why I am replying,

Excuse me, you just explained Obama...errr...Herod. He has no right
to tell me to pay for something beyond evil, the gravest evil, abortion.

I didn't say you couldn't have intercourse. God knows what is best for
you, He is your creator, you don't want to follow His help, his ways, your choice, deal with the consequences. And don't we see them, a list of sexual sins a mile long, serious illness, the destruction of the family and the killing of the most innocent, a child in their mother's womb.

Next year, it will be 40 years of the culture of death.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:51 AM
link   
You all,

The purity, the innocence of our children, where has it gone? I just want
to cry.

God isn't going to put up with porn much longer. 40 years, 40 is an important number, we see from history, God is going to act.

The priority, to get our souls right with God.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 03:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by colbe

You all,

The purity, the innocence of our children, where has it gone? I just want
to cry.

God isn't going to put up with porn much longer. 40 years, 40 is an important number, we see from history, God is going to act.

The priority, to get our souls right with God.


Too bad this is America and what your god likes and does not like has nothing to do with the place. This is not a theocracy. Take your god and your caveman laws and buy yourself a nice little plot of land and start your own country. You are not going to make my America some dark ages theocracy.



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 03:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by Charmed707
reply to post by LErickson
 


What did I say that's not realistic?


The entire post. I am most shocked by your claim that a promiscuous 16 year old girl gets rewarded instead of scorned for that exact behavior but your entire post.





top topics
 
57
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join