This below figure is Figure 3.2 out of the ASCE report.
As you can see, it is not a 42°, but much greater attack angle which they show, and the right wing tip is far out and away from the generator housing on its trailer when it passes through or over that trailer. The right jet engine would slam through that housing, while impacting it head on.
When the plane would have come in like that, the right wing its lower than the wing hanging jet engine, would have gone through the back of the generator trailer housing :






Here below I used the same figure 3.2 and drew my own wingtip and nose-cone lines in it, and the two jet engines as blue dots. Those blue lines by me depict a plane coming in at about a 75° angle.

The right wing tip's guide-rail, nr 3 on my two blue lines, which is its furthest out flap guide rail ("winglet" called here by me, to keep its description short) would then make that gouge in the roof of the generator housing build on top of that trailer's undercarriage.
With an angle to its roof of about 75° with its longest side, that stood parallel to the fence, that stood parallel to the west wall's facade bottom line.
The white lines depict another angle of attack, the white dots in them depict both the jet engines.




Another drawing from the ASCE report, the plane is flying too low, the left jet engine is plowing under the soil, the left wing is too low to fit the second floor its outer bottom line damage seen in the Riskus and Ingersoll photos, and other pictures taken within an hour after impact. The fuselage body must have flown into that two windows wide hole above the drawn by the ASCE artist body, so, the whole plane must have flown at least 2 meter higher :





This is a sharp photo taken after the partial collapse at the Pentagon.
There is something intriguing me in this photo.
The wooden stairs end much higher than the underside of the metal entrance door in the side panel of the generator housing. It would suggest that the whole generator trailer stood on some kind of blocks, originally thus in an about 1 meter higher position.
That could explain the ease with which the impact of the right wing its out-most flap guide rail its sharp edged housing lowest part, could have dislocated that whole heavy trailer, and has pushed its north end where the diesel tank stood, towards the west wall, and at the same time pushed the whole trailer off its blocks, which caused it to also fall backwards, in a southernly direction. That's why the generator trailer its maintenance cabin door now is lower than the wooden stair, and about 1.5 meter backwards located.





Below is a much sharper and wider photo that shows the onset of the gouge, in the top of the side panel, just 20 cm to the left of the generator housing's maintenance door. And here you can see that the wooden stair its platform must have been level with the metal door's bottom.
The impression is also planted by the way this photo is taken, that the right jet engine must have cut through the top part of the diesel tank container, the dull red colored front part, with a dent in its top part. This dent however looks much more like a sagging-in from the material, caused by the prolonged heavy burning of that diesel in that tank.
The bended poles from the fence are also curiously bended outward, not towards the west wall, but outwards, away from it. The former sheets blocking sight into the renovation trailers space area, is laying on the ground, beside the bottom of the wire mesh from that fence. It is not dragged away by any part of the wing, it is neatly piled up along and at the bottom of that fence as white colored sheets. The strange thing is that on pre-9/11 photos, that sheet material looks black colored. Perhaps it had two differently colored sides, a black outside, and a white inside. The White side then pointing inwards, towards the trailer area.

Later on I will show with some Purdue simulation screen shots, and some ASCE report drawings, that the officially proposed 42° attack angle would be in fact devastating to this ASCE proposal that the right jet engine has gone through this part of the disappeared fence material. It does not fit into the 42° internal damage path anymore then, and neither does it fit a line through the 5 "downed" light poles and through the 42° internal damage path inside the Pentagon. In nearly all ASCE report drawings they depict a totally different attack angle, from 50 to 58 to even 70° angles, just as in the Purdue simulation report.
You will not find any drawings by them, that really show a precise 42° attack angle.
And the wing tip that according to Mr Probst in that ASCE report went through that roof, would be sticking about twenty meters out from the southern rim of the generator cabin's roof.
When you believe Mr Probst report, the right jet engine would pass the corner of the fence within a wide margin of many meters. Which it in fact did, when you accept at last that the plane came from a north of the CITGO gas station direction, under an angle to the west wall of about 75° to 80°. And its wing tip will then pass over that roof, and will be able to make that gouge imprint in that roof with its out-most guide rail housing.
And the other, more inward guide rail will then rip that wire mesh away, together with its two missing pole-top-parts. And thus making that two poles wide hole in that fence.
And no further immense damage to the diesel tank or the generator cabin. Because they were already pushed out of the way by the first impact on the roof by the out-most guide rail. thus the second guide rail could rip away the wire mesh, the sheets and rip the two light poles off their bottom parts.




The hole in the fence, explained away by the ASCE report as caused by the right wing its jet engine, must have been caused by another wing structure.
Why? Because Probst said he saw the wing-tip impact the generator trailer. And then the jet engine is so far away from that hole, it must have passed to the left side of the corner edge of that fence.
Another reason : my explanation above. The trailer stood, also according to aerial photos taken on September 5, 2001, tightly fit in the corner part of that fence. And parallel to that fence its north to south length.




When the right wing jet engine of AA 77 would have caused that hole, the whole diesel tank plus generator and the trailer both stood on would have been blown to hundreds of pieces by the enormous impact of that tons heavy jet engine, impacting with that speed.
There would not have been much left of that whole trailer. And about hundred meter of that fence would have been totally ripped out of the ground.
The impact repercussions of such heavy parts at such speeds are very grave, and not a t all what we can see here.
That's why I believe Probst his ASCE eyewitness report, that perfectly fits the damage we see in this above photo, and the generator cabin's roof gouge photo :




That rear gouge makes an angle of about 75° with the roofs longitudinal rim line.
Thus, that SoC attack flight path by AA 77 is just an official bunch of hogwash, and a flat out, obvious lie.

This is another ASCE report drawing, showing a logical angle of attack by AA 77.
And I added a few of the newly found NoC flight path witness positions to it :




Probst was standing somewhere along the red line I drew in that Figure 3.13 out of the ASCE report. Don Mason (ASCE report), Penny Elgas, Vin Narayanan and Christine Peterson's positions are yellow dotted in by me too. Mr Levi stood in the Lane One area of the South Parking Lot and had a perfect view to the plane's starboard wing side and the point of impact.

And Roosevelt Roberts (white R.R.+ arrow), the CIT/PfT "witness" for a fly-over, stood at the rim of the east loading dock area of South Loading (that's the most eastern part of it) :




And when you listen to Roosevelt's two telephone interviews with CIT, and read his Army History Units interview, and his Library of Congress interview, and you are not hell bend to use him as a possible "fly-over" witness, it becomes crystal clear that he describes first the diving down from over the Annex towards Route 27, from his point of view out, nearing the Pentagon in an airspace above the Lane One area of the South Parking Lot, and then disappearing out of his sight, and then he describes later, the sound and affects of the impact in the west wall, just as all other witnesses described the same impact.
Later he talks about the C-130 higher in the sky above Route 27, nearing him on an eastwards course, then making a turn northwest wards above Route 27 but in front of the smoke column. CIT however really wants to make it true, that he still describes AA 77, when in reality he switched over to his description of the C-130.
If Roosevelt ever gives another interview, I bet you he will tell the same story as I just explained above. He saw two planes, within a three minutes interval.

Sean Boger stood together with his female colleague in the Heli Pad tower, and saw the plane heading toward a spot about 60 meter to his left in the west wall, coming from a flight path northernly of the CITGO gas station. He looked straight at that gas station from his position on the top floor of that tower. If you don't believe what he saw, look up his online testimonies (interviewed by CIT and the Army History Units, and some newspapers).

As you can see, the plane must have crossed Route 27 over that dirt mound with the yellow VDOTtrailer used for lamp-post transportation, photographed on 9/11, behind it.
I have two more photos near each one of some of the downed 5 poles, with another yellow VDOT trailer in it, photographed on 9/11. That's three trailers, positioned in places where people could have carried, already prepared as broken, lamp pole pieces to Route 27.
This one would have been placed in an ideal spot to prepare for the taxi windshield spearing story a hundred meters further on Route 27, above the Pike overpass bridge.
I can easily imagine those pole pieces waiting there on top of this VDOT trailer, to be picked up by one or more of the three guys in the Ingersoll pictures where we saw these guys blocking the south going lane of Route 27 with their vehicles, around the taxi cab with the hole in the front windshield, and the piece of curved light pole laying on the tarmac in front of it :





Mystery test : find the second VDOT trailer in this hires picture of the three cars surrounding the speared taxi cab plus curved pole.(remember, there's a third VDOT trailer in another 9/11 hires picture ! ).
"Members who would seek to refute conspiracy theories should be mindful of AboveTopSecret.com's TRADITION of focusing on conspiracy theories, cover-ups, and scandals" :





Steve Riskus saw AA 77 cross over Route 27 in the position and manner as depicted in the below photo, of Route 27 at the spot where Riskus was driving on 9/11, when he saw the plane passing over the road, just as depicted below. He admitted in email to the Italian blogger that made this composition photo-drawing below, that it showed EXACTLY what he saw on 9/11/2001. If he would have seen the official SoC flight path, he would have seen a much smaller plane (to his eyes) crossing Route 27 in the far distance in the same photo below, just passing in front of that second traffic signs board you can just vaguely see (green signs) spanning the road, in the far distance (under the huge board you see under the tail of the plane. The position of the two trees that stood in front of the Helipad on 9/11 are drawn in by me depicted by my 2 blue lines and my 2 green circles :




This is what Steve Riskus would have seen through his rear window when he would have driven down southwards, a few hundred meter further, and AA 77 would have really crossed Route 27 at the officially promoted point, just north of the overpass of Route 27 over the last part of Columbia Pike, leading to the Pentagon's South Parking Lot :




Steve Riskus did not see an airplane in this above or below configuration, the below one with its nose slightly up, to pass over the roofs of the Pentagon's west wing, thus negating the CIT and PfTruth fly-over theory. He keeps repeating that he definitely saw a plane in a downward configuration, nose down and tail slightly up, and that he saw that same plane slamming in the west wall of the Pentagon. Have a look at old 2001 aerial photos, there were no obstacles except the two trees in his field of view towards the impacted portion of the west wall. And he could easily look under the foliage of those two trees, since the nose cone's impact point was only 2.40 meters/yards high, at the level of the second floor's concrete slab :





This is an aerial photo of the Pentagon and Route 27 about 110 yards / meters in front of it. The spot where Steve Riskus drove in the south going lanes, is further north of the half of 27 spanning road signs board. He says he saw that huge plane passing low, just behind that board.
Not the two times wider board, much further south, that spans the whole Route 27 lanes space. And he saw it cross over perpendicular to Route 27, not at a 42° angle, as the ASCE report wants us to believe :





As a closing note, I gave enough pointers and names and places to make good use of the local ATS Search function to unearth by yourself, much more relevant material to this discussion from former and later ATS posts. And much more can be found while using the same search terms with Google's world wide search engine.

REFERENCES LIST.

Just a few more pictures and drawings to use as relevant discussion material :

A visualization by me, of the possible height above the Annex buildings, and the slightly right banking dive towards the west wall's impact point, passing the CITGO gas station just north of its canopy
:



Pilots for Truth depicted the height of the attacking plane wrong :




This is sergeant William Lagasse pointing at the space where he saw for the first time AA 77 turn up in his field of view, while he was filling up his Pentagon Police cruiser at the filling unit under the most northernly part of the CITGO gas station canopy roof :




Robert Turcios, manager of the CITGO gas station on 9/11, who points at Route 27, where a few hundred meters in front of it the plane leveled off from his dive along and above the hillside behind Wing 8 of the Navy Annex, as Robert indicates with his hand going slightly up. He also said that the right wing tip of the plane passed over the quite big tree that stood just left of the north wall of the payment store under the CITGO roof :




Two depictions of a possible flight path of AA 77, first aside the Sheraton Hotel, over the car repair garage of Mr Paik, over the head of Terry Morin in between the Wings 4 and 5 of the Navy Annex buildings, and slightly to the north of pentagon Police officers sergeant Brooks and then sergeant Lagasse at the CITGO gas station, and then towards the 4 ANC workers at the ANC Maintenance buildings at the far south rim of the Arlington National Cemetery grounds, to turn to the right over the parking space just south of the ANC buildings, towards Route 27 and then the impact point in the west wall, and towards the Heli Pad Tower with Sean Boger in it, who saw it impact about 60 meters to his left, while he was looking at it diving towards him in a slightly right banking turn :




This one is corrected for the only way Mr Paik could have viewed up from his desk inside his office, just in front of his office window, alongside Columbia Pike, thus he could have seen while looking high up, as he described, only the belly of the plane and its right wing, over the Pike :




These are two proposals for what Terry Morin saw, while standing in between the Navy Annex Wings 4 and 5, just 10 feet / 3 meter inside the space between them. he said the plane he saw would have flown through the space that the later Air Force Monument takes in :




A few roughly composed viable NoC flight paths (any slightly different other path is possible), covering all NoC witness positions, and compared to a SoC official attack angle of 42° to the west wall facade bottom line. They also described the SoC attack angle as 60.25° to true north :




All the NoC CIT witnesses positions drawn in by me, and a few Route 27 witnesses found by me :







In my opinion, the only eventually a bit viable possibility for the CIT/PfTruth fly-over theory.
Since there are no witnesses at all that describe a huge plane leaving the Pentagon area north, east or southwards, this could be a means of landing the plane after it passed low over the roofs of the Pentagon, without impacting at all.
Sorry, but that is such a ridiculous theory, that it has no merit to discuss it further here, the plane would have had to have crossed Route 27 under an idiotic huge right bank, that NOBODY reported. Everybody reported a slight right bank, and some a last moment very slight left correctional bank, and that's why the right wing made a circa 8° angled imprint on the southern side of the impact in the facade :





The 8° wing imprint at the right of the fuselage impact point :




Three pictures in an early stage of the ignition of the diesel tank attached to the generator trailer. Note the first white smoke, as if it was ignited by a small HE explosive :












The mess at the left side of the impact point. Looks like a generator trailer undercarriage with axle and wheel :




This could be the remains of the long white trailer to be seen in the September 5 photo parked in front of the West wall and the impact-tree, and it even looks as if this was also a generator trailer, with the connector cover from generator to dynamo to be seen at the yellow arrow :




Below is a picture such as the ASCE research team encountered when they for the first ever and only time were allowed in the impacted Pentagon area, for a whopping FOUR HOURS only. After that, they were never allowed in anymore. Not a single shed of evidence to be found by them of a single piece of an airplane, the Engineers arm of the military had the site meticulously cleaned up, before the ASCE team was shown around a clean area, on October the 4th 2001. Read the last pages of the ASCE report, and it will be instantly clear to anybody who ever read multiple research reports, that this report was meant to deliver just one thing : the view of the military and Pentagon top bras and the US government in Washington, they all concluded that their report lacked a great deal of withheld evidence :




Below is a wide angled picture of the fenced-in renovation trailers area space :




The below picture is where the 42° impact theory proposed by the ASCE report is based on.
One huge problem anyone with a graduated plastic circle will immediately see :
That is a 55° impact/attack angle ! When you draw a real 42° attack angle in, it is even more obvious than in this one, that the right jet engine will smash through the whole trailer's side panels, if there would be any possibility to create a gouge in the roof by an out-most flap guide rail housing which bottom part is sharp as a knife, sharp enough to cut that gouge in the roof of that generator cabin's roof that is shown in one of my earlier picture links :




Aerial photo of the impact area, so to see after collapse of the Wedge 1 part :




Three screen shots by me from the 3D drawings made by a Purdue computer, from the Purdue University animation attempt, which is not very convincing, even worse in fact than the ASCE report drawings :













Two screen shots by me from the Purdue animation, link can be read in the bottom text.
It's obvious that also this proposed flight path ends with the right wing tip far away over the trailer, and the right engine impacting the side of the diesel tank attached to the generator cabin, both build on the same trailer undercarriage :




This last screenshot even more clearly shows that the right jet engine misses the whole fence corner by a meter, so it can never make a hole in the wire mesh a meter to the left of that fence corner. It is also not depicting a 42° attack angle, as the internal damage path combined with the officially proposed flight path through the 5 downed light poles predicts, according to those ASCE report end-editors.
So what is wrong with that whole story of those 5 downed light poles, the internal damage path as described in the ASCE report, and that stupid "exit" hole in the C-ring wall, which was of course an entry hole, any demolition expert will see what it is, a wall-breach unit's entry hole, blasted through from the outside, attached to that C-Ring wall in the corridor between Ring B and C, to get as fast as could be to the new Navy ONI offices and their Main Frames, with all their top secret secrets in them, that had to be erased, at all costs, and they apparently succeeded also to erase all years long accounting efforts to bring the 6.9 Trillion dollars missing funds above water. A massive 2.3 trillion dollars are to this day unaccounted for, since the back-ups were saved in WTC 7, enough black money to fund hundreds of 9/11 false flag operations, so you know what is coming at you in the near future :

This is what really was the reason and what happened at the Pentagon on 9/11 :
















Copied long ago I believe, from this site : The Wisdom Fund. (Google its link.) They were screen shots I made from a video there.

The 1.5 GB file I had prepared on these subjects had many more photos and much more text and links to relevant stories, but a dumb hacker found it necessary to wreck it, delete it.

So be it. I will continue to find and publish relevant facts and my own theories based on logical factual-backed conclusions, to prove that 9/11 was a huge psychological false flag operation, in which those hijackers, duped as devout Muslims, played just a minor patsy part. They were lied to, just as all of us. They were CIA or Mossad, or another deep secret agency's, assets.
I do not believe they really intended to hit those targets, they were told another story, just to get them in those cockpits. It even could be so crooked, that also the pilots thought they all were part of a war game operation, and that's perhaps why they were so easily leaving their seats. If they ever did so.... Then just a few seconds before the impacts, the remote steering took over, and someone in one of the controller planes, possibly a C-130 like the one from Lt Col O'Brien, or the Doomsday planes active all day and near the victim planes, flipped a switch and sent those planes into their targets. It could be just one person, equipped with the right strong sender and manipulative switches.
And a life video feed from the planes their nose cones, the planes he took over in the last crucial seconds.That is also the utter simple scenario.
Always cut your conspiracy scenarios down to the bare minimum, that way the risk for planners and executors is evenly brought back to the bare minimum.

There are also many black-ops business type FAA-unregistered planes used by the deep cover agencies, perhaps like the totally white plane reported near Flight 93, before it was downed.
And the totally white one, without identification marks, flying at 35,000 feet, the one I reported on at page 200 of the longest thread ever at ATS ( "A Boeing 757 did hit the Pentagon", now 300 pages long), the Lear Jet type business plane that turned out to have been in the air all day long on 9/11 (all non-military/agency planes were ordered to land already in the late morning, this one thus must have been refueled in the air, since it had not landed yet) and got chased away by one of the jet fighters that protected Air-force One when it was near its landing position at Washington, DC, to bring G.W. Bush back to where he belonged. The White House.
The eyewitness story-link of that purely white plane, by the jet fighter pilot in an Air Force official online publication or such, is probably, just as all my former dangerous to the establishment links, now a defunct link. I will check it out later.

I suspect that specific white plane that got chased away to have been the plane for the few in crowd-invited spectators for the "movie" that 9/11 must have been for these kind of sick people.
The white one near Flight 93 was effectively owned by one of Warren Buffet's many owned by proxy, firms.
It must have been full with planners of 9/11. And their backers, the ones who later raked in the immense profits, and distributed it back to all the in crowd-members, all the rest of them sick people.
9/11 was an enormous money making scam, on global scale.
And it must have all been atheists, since a real believer will doubt, and be afraid of the last ordeal. These people are convinced that there is one life, and one chance to rake in as much money as you can get. The only thing they are concerned with, is the well being of their offspring. Because they "know" that when their life ends, the next generation will profit from their accumulated wealth.
Endanger their offspring, their heirs, and you have a small chance to change their plots.
They will not plot further, when the outcome is in the end, an atomic fire that will consume their heirs, or/and themselves.
That's why this conspiracy-'spiel' is so creepy, it seems that they thought that 9/11 and its aftermath, will never fail.

One of the main goals of 9/11 was to prepare Americans for a full out war on Muslims, and many of their countries. Good old Holy Wars. Pushing gullible Christians through the idiot-savant borderline. How stupid can you be when you can't feel the difference anymore between propaganda and reality? Not all Muslims are radicals, only very few are, the rest are just as normal as all of us, Christians, Buddhists, Jews or whatever you belief in.

Thus, after 9/11, the Pentagon could push their aggressive operations through the throats of unaware and full blown by then patriots, US based and global based citizens alike, and get their unlimited funding back, that got taken away from them after the Iron Curtain fell, and Russia abandoned the hard-line communist doctrine. During the Clinton era.

They have planned for years, together with those heartless AIPAC members, how to regain their grip on those unlimited funds from before the Clinton years.
The Reagan doctrine and Iran-contra years. God, they must have adored that misguided poor man, those utterly greedy and utterly cruel upper-brass men and women in the Pentagon.
The Pentagon brass at that time had their second field day during the Reagan era, which came after the Vietnam Johnson era. Now they had their third field day, during the Bush-family Iraq/Afghanistan era, and its aftermath, the road to overthrow the Iran Ayatollahs, and the enduring all-out war on "global terrorism", created and held alive by the CIA and the likes.
Which means simply put, an all out war on Islam.

Any attack on Iran will be blocked by the (not so) secret (anymore) alliance of Russia, China, India, Brazil and possibly now, secretly also Pakistan and Japan. And who knows which countries more.
These economies need OIL or ENERGY. That's what it comes down to, in the end.
Who gets most of it.


And the main reason of course for 9/11, was the oldest habit of inherently crooked men and women :

Pure and unconditional, unadulterated GREED !
For power, or for the Mammon.

Damn, forgot how to link to Web Archived links.
Another try :

First half to be copy/pasted in your browser's address line, and add a small letter "h" in front of it first :

ttp://web.archive.org/web/20041026123129/

Second part to be copy/pasted directly behind the first part, and add a small letter "h" in front of the below text line first ,again :

ttp://www.criticalthrash.com/terror/crashthumbnails.html

Then you have a long line of text, of which both half's begin with http, and then you can push enter, or click that long link its now combined text line in your address bar, to go to the former but now defunct, old thumbnail page of the Steve Riskus HiRes photo's from the first minutes after impact of AA 77 in the West wall of the Pentagon.
You can then click each thumbnail, and a High Resolution photo will load in your next browser tab page.

EDIT : I'm sure there is a better way to forum-link to Web Archived pages, but it's damn late and I need some rest.

One last very good tip/advice for the sight-impaired elderly and the youngsters alike :
Use your keyboard's "CTRL" and "+" key-combination several times to blow up this threads pages more and more, it will give you a much better resolution to view all these interesting photo's and drawings.

Let me be the first to flag you.

I do not have time to read all of the info right now, but wow man

This is a massive amount of info to pour over.

Good work.

Holy christ that was a rough read.

Snf, but man.....

God the OPs posts are long. Can't you shorten it up a bit so we can get a feel about the exact thing you are trying to say. I'll admit I didn't read 90% of it. It has lots of pretty pictures but that's about all I looked at.

Alfie said it best with very few words.
If you admit the generator was hit by a wing the rest is wasted effort.

And that's the way 99% of Americans see the whole thing.

More made up trivial **** by a poseur who obviously has nothing better to do than post reams of crap that's wrong on an obscure internet site.

No one needs to go through the punishment of reading all of that tripe. The OP has been told numerous times that the aircraft can not get from point A via his point B without a horrendous bank angle. Who of their "cherry picked" witnesses reported an airshow type bank angle on the way to the Pentagon crash. Answer = none.

Then he looks at low res photos in an attempt to make precise measurements. Photos that exhibit foreshortening are deceptive, so he has no idea about the accuracy of his measurements in the first place.

This is called looking up a goat's butt with one eyeball while ignoring the rest of the goat... What about all of the other evidence proving an SOC flight path both prior to and after the crash into the building?

As if that's not enough he then posts walls of text in a non standard style typical of his prose making for extremely difficult reading... Labtop, your time would be better spent taking an English writing course. Then with all of yout knowledge and intelligence you might then get a Pulitzer for your efforts. Of course, it would be in the category of FICTION!