It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mainidh
Sigh, so eager...
To me, it is imaging artifact. If you had looked round the general area, there are plenty of these things, it just happens that the one in the V formation is following the shape of the brightness on the crater rim.
If you look you'll see that the irregularly lit craters have irregular orbs.. dots.. space ships... bases...
They're even smiling for the camera here!
And here they are on holiday at the Resort Lunar. It's a good time of the year I hear...
Now I'll expect all the die hard fans to jump up and down screaming "They look nothing alike!!!!!11" but to me, it's just a duck.
Originally posted by AmatuerSkyWatcher
reply to post by eriktheawful
Well the images that google used are not 45 years old, the Clementine mission bwas in 1994, but I get your point.
Google did however alter the original images to make them fit the sphere in their program. Did I mention the images were already altered prior to that too? Ooops must have forgot.
Originally posted by marbneserb
I know this isn't exactly forum etiquette but I can't start my own thread yet and I really want to know your opinion.
This picture was sent to me by a friend who works at Nellis airforce base. He says it's a HUD view of a F-16 intercepting a UFO just outside of Nellis airforce base Nevada. Not sure what to make of it but the thing the F-16 is locked on to definitely doesn't look like a regular aircraft to me.
Originally posted by draknoir2
Originally posted by gunshooter
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
Why is it not a crater?
because most craters do not form a perfect point. please please please please try to have more of an open mind, and not try to shoot things down right away......
The "open-minded" have somehow ruled out crater and image artifacts... something even the OP has yet to do.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by braydenf
Originally posted by mainidh
Sigh, so eager...
To me, it is imaging artifact. If you had looked round the general area, there are plenty of these things, it just happens that the one in the V formation is following the shape of the brightness on the crater rim.
If you look you'll see that the irregularly lit craters have irregular orbs.. dots.. space ships... bases...
They're even smiling for the camera here!
And here they are on holiday at the Resort Lunar. It's a good time of the year I hear...
Now I'll expect all the die hard fans to jump up and down screaming "They look nothing alike!!!!!11" but to me, it's just a duck.
proof enough for me
Originally posted by eriktheawful
Here you guys go, thought it would be fun to compare pictures. The left side is Google Earth, the Right side is LROC.
I tired to size up the craters as closely as possible, but it was very hard since Google's pic is no where near as detailed as LROC. Still, it's the very same area:
Originally posted by boncho
Hoax bin?
Originally posted by PINGi14
Originally posted by boncho
Hoax bin?
We need to find the uncompressed version of the exact image used as source in Google Earth/OP's anomaly claim. So far we only found image of the same location but taken at different time so can't conclude as hoax.
Originally posted by Teabags
Originally posted by braydenf
Originally posted by mainidh
Sigh, so eager...
To me, it is imaging artifact. If you had looked round the general area, there are plenty of these things, it just happens that the one in the V formation is following the shape of the brightness on the crater rim.
If you look you'll see that the irregularly lit craters have irregular orbs.. dots.. space ships... bases...
They're even smiling for the camera here!
And here they are on holiday at the Resort Lunar. It's a good time of the year I hear...
Now I'll expect all the die hard fans to jump up and down screaming "They look nothing alike!!!!!11" but to me, it's just a duck.
proof enough for me
I would like to know why this photographic anomally exists
Originally posted by Blaine91555
I downloaded the highest resolution DEM (digital elevation model) available just yesterday.
I can open the huge images on my graphics machine but not on my laptop. Google would never load if they used the available images.
Truly sad all the attention seekers blogging and posting this stuff on sites never seem to be willing to explain these things to people.