It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BiggerPicture
i'd rather be goyim!
Chazal clearly state that one who has sexual relations with an uncircumcised man finds it difficult to leave him; this seems to me to be the most compelling reason for circumcision." According to the greatest of religious arbiters, one of the reasons for circumcision is the desire to reduce sexual ability and enjoyment for Jewish men …
Originally posted by Ahabstar
reply to post by el1jah
And that is religion: it is okay to mutilate (and therefore reduce pleasure from sex for both men and women) but it is not okay to eat pork or shellfish despite modern sanitation. Go figure.
Originally posted by mosheh24
The fact that there is blood tells me they aren't doing it right to begin with because if they did it on the 8th day like mandated in Torah there should be no blood unless it is because they cut more foreskin than mandated by Torah or did it after 8 days.
Originally posted by el1jah
reply to post by ofNight
yeah you can see in my inital posts I thought it was obviously not what I thought.... butttt it is.
According to other posters this is rarely still practiced, and those who do practice this use a glass tube of sorts... So the number who still mouth it is probably very small. Doesnt make it any more right but its a little bit of a relief, I thought this was a giant conspiracy.
This is why the baby (and their twin brother) most likely died, the Mohel directly passed herpes to the children orally.
Check this out for more info- Circumcision, Talmud style