posted on Mar, 4 2012 @ 10:48 AM
To the OP.
In many aspects you are not correct.
Point A: not Valid.
Point B: Incorrect - Wrong Assumption but valid. Dating incorrect. Its not 1.3 Million years old. Little less.
Point C: Incorrect - Wrong Assumption
But ... between the 1.3 million (less) years and the Mexican Skulls you have a huge gap don't you ?
The questions you could be asking yourself:
- Why the footprints are on Lava "displaying footprints IN LAVA discovered in central Mexico of modern man"
(Not preserved by lava)
- When can you make footprints in Lava ROCK
"The lava was also examined as to whether or not it was sediment, or fresh when the footprints were placed in it, and it was determined that the
grains were magnetically aligned, hence the prints were placed while the lava was fresh, at the time of the volcanic eruption"
- What was happening 1.3 (less) million years ago.
- Why Charles Darwin - Isaac Newton - John Herschel are all in Westminster Abbey.
edit on 4-3-2012 by Lastone because: (no reason given)