It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Starchild23
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Originally posted by Sahabi
I understand "I Am" and "This Is" to be expressing the same concept.
They are. But to some, they are not.edit on 1-3-2012 by smithjustinb because: (no reason given)edit on 1-3-2012 by smithjustinb because: (no reason given)
Then what's the purpose of this thread?
To clarify? To confuse? To mock? To entertain?
If you're acting like you're disagreeing, then coming out and saying "I both agree and disagree, but these are the same"...
...this is just confusing. Leave the definitions of the concepts be.
Originally posted by smithjustinb
This is is I am, but I am isn't always seen as this is.
My thoughts about THIS have greater influence on how I see the world than my thoughts about me. In other words, if you want to control your emotions, it's a matter of controlling how you feel about the external.
All that is outside is really on the inside. What I think about this computer I am writing on has an effect on my brain because this computer is in my brain. Everything observed is ovserved within.
A negative thought directed towards something "external" is the source of a negative internal emotion because what you are directing the thought towards is actually inside your head. So if you want to shine, then see all as shining.
What is outside is really what is inside. Therefore, you are not, but this is and you are this.
Originally posted by WhiteHat
I would be careful with definite statements like " the truth about....", especially on topics like this.
I thought that consciousness is the ability to be aware. Every living being possesses that ability. Intellectual analysis comes after that, a virtual construction of concepts, born from the mind's inability to stay in the "now", to keep the awareness. The more we play with concepts, the more complicated this virtual construction becomes, the more intelligent we appear to be. Yet the more concepts, the more we depart from reality, and the less aware we are.
Replacing "I am" with "this is" will only shift the focus of these concepts. Because nothing really "is" there except the present moment and the experience of it within our awareness. That's the only truth that is. But we keep missing it, and replacing with all kind of concepts.
The way to go is to just be aware of "whatever is", just be the experience, without any other mental games on top of it. Naked awareness, without the need to explain whatever is, or to translate it to ourselves all the time. Then the truth will become obvious, the "real" truth, not a concept of it. I guess that's the reason all the great masters say that the truth cannot be explained or passed on, but only experienced personally.
edit on 2-3-2012 by WhiteHat because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by WhiteHat
I would be careful with definite statements like " the truth about....", especially on topics like this.
I thought that consciousness is the ability to be aware. Every living being possesses that ability. Intellectual analysis comes after that, a virtual construction of concepts, born from the mind's inability to stay in the "now", to keep the awareness. The more we play with concepts, the more complicated this virtual construction becomes, the more intelligent we appear to be. Yet the more concepts, the more we depart from reality, and the less aware we are.
Replacing "I am" with "this is" will only shift the focus of these concepts. Because nothing really "is" there except the present moment and the experience of it within our awareness. That's the only truth that is. But we keep missing it, and replacing with all kind of concepts.
The way to go is to just be aware of "whatever is", just be the experience, without any other mental games on top of it. Naked awareness, without the need to explain whatever is, or to translate it to ourselves all the time. Then the truth will become obvious, the "real" truth, not a concept of it. I guess that's the reason all the great masters say that the truth cannot be explained or passed on, but only experienced personally.
edit on 2-3-2012 by WhiteHat because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Don't say this is this or this is that. Just say this is, and let your mind wander freely through the fact of the existence of this.
Originally posted by D1ss1dent
reply to post by smithjustinb
You talk like a Jnani and I like that. Elaborately, what is your own definition of intelligence?
edit on 2-3-2012 by D1ss1dent because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by smithjustinb
The truth about consciousness is that there is only one. So by saying, "this is", you are identifying more closely with consciousness as it is (unbounded) rather than consciousness with limitations. Everything is internal.
Originally posted by absolutely
reply to post by smithjustinb
i dont get it how u reach to blind ur sights to that extent of wills? how everything is internal when u have all before ur eyes independant of ur body clearly and mind and in colourful shapes that u cant miss to recognize
Originally posted by absolutely
reply to post by smithjustinb
this is wrong totally
the plus is only what exist that is why objectively is only the most free superior object, but also free objects realities
u internally exist relatively since u r not free object, but internally ur relative existence is the plus u r only, so by considering out plus then u plus is out relatively in a way u can see so conceive to become of what realized positively alone
somthg should stop that mascarad, u keep meaning u as a we without any regard to existence rights, it is from my perspective all evil as impossible to b real, u r freely using words that cant belong to ur wills
i guess it introduces what will come next