posted on Mar, 1 2012 @ 08:03 AM
I have just read Chris Mohrs(summary of) report and they have it would seem stuck to the same proceedure as the Herit el al study....so we now have
yet again UNCONCLUSIVE results....now lets look at scientific studies is Butter good for you or not....seems like study after study agrees or
disagrees.....Does it make one study more or less valued....Not at all...It means that you have conflicting data and for some reason one study does
not produce the same results.....now according to Chris on the Jref forums(which is baised to wowrds the OS) this is the summary and he will release
the data and the results today.....so we will wait and see .....
So if the case is that this particular study which he managed to raise a whopping $1000 to have done....is interesting to say the least.....Now what
does this mean....It means most likely that another study will be done by Herit et al to confirm or deny the results...
So we will yet again have to see....now another item on the Jref forum which was interesting was a rust proof paint in the pigment there is a amount
aluminium silicate.....so where was this in this study....so we will have to wait and see......also there is strontium.......but again in the summary
this was not found......now in the beginning it is stated by Chris this would be an unbiased study......So i would imagine that in an Unbiased study
why would it not unbiasly find all traces of elements that should be there.
I look forward to seeing the full study results......rather than results coming from a biased point of view....i don't know if or if not Thermite was
even necessary to bring down the towers....but i do know that what was needed was alot more than aircrafts....kerosene.....and gravity....in buildings
that had stood for 40yrs .....suffered a large fire in the 70's .......a truck bomb in the 90.s........had enough asbestos in them that they would
have easily thwarted the fire ......because otherwise they would not have been so worried about the cost of taking them down.
So PLB please post the full results when you get the chance.
Just a side note: If the OS community was so eager to discount Herit et al analysis....why follow the same proceedure to repeat their testing when
they stated over the years how flawed it was in the first place and called them a bunch of psuedo scientist's(just an after thought)
edit on 083131p://f06Thursday by plube because: (no reason given)
edit on 093131p://f31Thursday by plube because: needed to
qualify as to the statement of report to summary of said report