Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Obama's hidden birth certificate now exposed

page: 27
126
<< 24  25  26    28  29  30 >>

log in

join

posted on Feb, 28 2012 @ 11:37 PM
link   
Plenty of people know...I am not the only one.

My point is no one cares.....the constitution is irrelevant.....we are now the United Socialist States of America.

Why doesn't anyone just speak the truth?




posted on Feb, 28 2012 @ 11:40 PM
link   
Does anyone have a link to the White House website version?

With the multiple Photoshop layers?

what's that about?



posted on Feb, 28 2012 @ 11:40 PM
link   
reply to post by LErickson
 


It is clear you didn't read my post on the meaning of the 14 th amendment.



posted on Feb, 28 2012 @ 11:41 PM
link   
A person who is naturally gifted as an artist - we call them a 'natural born artist' - the talent was there from birth.

A person who taught themselves math or has a natural aptitude for it - we say they are a 'natural born genius' - their skills were there from birth.

A person who is automatically granted citizenship by virtue of being born in this land - is a 'natural born citizen' - all the rights and laws apply to them from birth.

If Arnold Schwarzenegger had been born in America, even if his parents were from Austria, he would be a natural born citizen. Anchor babies are natural born citizens.

In 1866, Senator Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th Amendment by writing:

"Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."



posted on Feb, 28 2012 @ 11:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
 


The constitution included those that were alive at the time of the signing....all you have to do is read it.



posted on Feb, 28 2012 @ 11:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
 


That's all nice for him to say but it is not what the man who helped write the amendment said.

Still no one reads what I posted.

This is useless....you will only see what you want to see....anything to believe Obama is legally the president and not a pupperect there by money and fraud. Whatever.
edit on 28-2-2012 by timetothink because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 28 2012 @ 11:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by timetothink


No skin off my nose the constitution was trampled on....the country as a whole loses.


Then you can stop going on about it now, right?



posted on Feb, 28 2012 @ 11:49 PM
link   
Probably not.....I am here to support the op and make Obama supporters hone their bullying skills. Glad to see it is working.



posted on Feb, 29 2012 @ 12:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by LErickson
 


It is clear you didn't read my post on the meaning of the 14 th amendment.


Oh I read it.
It is clear you are having a really tough time articulating your thoughts here. Repeating things that have already been shown to be not true is hardly a convincing tactic.



posted on Feb, 29 2012 @ 12:06 AM
link   
reply to post by LErickson
 


I showed it was true by what I posted....you....not so much.




posted on Feb, 29 2012 @ 12:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by timetothink
Probably not.....I am here to support the op and make Obama supporters hone their bullying skills. Glad to see it is working.


Then it is some skin off of your nose.
How about you try making sense from one post to another?



posted on Feb, 29 2012 @ 12:07 AM
link   
reply to post by LErickson
 


No it's just fun



posted on Feb, 29 2012 @ 12:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by doryinaz
he must be a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN....which means, born on US soil from two us parents


That is what you WANT it to mean, but it does not mean that at all.


so, Obama cannot be a natural born citizen....


Again, that is what you want, but the facts state otherwise. Which is why Obama is the legal POTUS!



posted on Feb, 29 2012 @ 12:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by LErickson
 


I showed it was true by what I posted....you....not so much.



OK, this is really stupid.
You go ahead and pat yourself on the back for "proving" whatever you think you proved, ok.
Tell you what, you win.
Obama is not eligible to be president.
Feel better?

Just whatever you do, do not check and see who is president. It might totally kill your fantasy.



posted on Feb, 29 2012 @ 12:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by LErickson
 


No it's just fun


Keep contradicting yourself.
That makes you more credible with each post.
edit on 29-2-2012 by LErickson because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 29 2012 @ 12:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by timetothink
It is clear you didn't read my post on the meaning of the 14 th amendment.


You mean your post on what someone wants it to mean, however reality works differently, and thus Obama is the legal POTUS



posted on Feb, 29 2012 @ 12:18 AM
link   
I keep forgetting .......DON'T FEED THE TROLLS....no more food for any of you.

Keep your ignorance to yourselves.



posted on Feb, 29 2012 @ 12:29 AM
link   
ATTENTION ALL

Thank you. That will do. Let's focus on the actual topic. Unless you have something productive to add to the thread, I suggest you move on. No more underhanded jabs at each other and no more 1-liners.

Thanks.



posted on Feb, 29 2012 @ 12:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by Gemwolf
ATTENTION ALL

Thank you. That will do. Let's focus on the actual topic. Unless you have something productive to add to the thread, I suggest you move on. No more underhanded jabs at each other and no more 1-liners.

Thanks.


Here is a thought.
Since this was already exposed on ATS 3 years ago, you close it as a duplicate or move it to HOAX where it belongs. Then you would not have any of these problems. I do not understand why ATS lets a second thread on a 3 year old HOAX go on for but moderates it. That makes no sense.



posted on Feb, 29 2012 @ 12:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by LErickson

Here is a thought.
Since this was already exposed on ATS 3 years ago, you close it as a duplicate or move it to HOAX where it belongs. Then you would not have any of these problems. I do not understand why ATS lets a second thread on a 3 year old HOAX go on for but moderates it. That makes no sense.


You'll notice that the thread is in the Hoax forum. It was moved to the Hoax forum very early in the thread's existence.

We wouldn't have "these problems" if members simply played nice.





new topics

top topics



 
126
<< 24  25  26    28  29  30 >>

log in

join