Aliens UFO : irrefutable evidence found & presented by scientists...no more bs ! 2012

reply to post by Pauligirl


Not that I don't believe you but could you post the email? After all, this is ATS

I wish these were real but looking at the artwork what culture does it tie to? it should be obvious to any professional. I've worked on movie props and these scream manufactured.

Originally posted by CaptainBeno
Would it be someone else that sent them there?

Aren't Blossom River group just the Auction house / sellers?

Now I'm confused?

Well, they are real, but in which capacity you see it? For $75 big ones I don't think you are going to lie.
I think there is a communication / fact / lost in translation problem here?

Could it be that the studies were done in private, not wanting to raise an alarm? When we are talking this much money...........would you keep it a secret? I would handcuff myself to the person doing the studies for that much cash.....and then some....

edit on 27-2-2012 by CaptainBeno because: (no reason given)

I wish I knew the answers. But, people will do a lot of strange things for money.
I don't think there was an communication problem-my email was pretty simple and so was the reply.
I guess we wait and see if Blossom River Group removes UNAM.

Originally posted by FlySolo
reply to post by Pauligirl

 

Not that I don't believe you but could you post the email? After all, this is ATS

Mine:
There is a group called Blossom River Group, Inc. that has some interesting artifacts for sale on the internet.
www.blossomrivergroup.com...
On their web page they say that your museum did some studies on the artifacts establishing age and composition. Can you tell me anything about these items?
Thank you for your time.

Reply:
The information on that webpage is FALSE. We have never heard of them before.

We have already sent an email asking to IMEDIATELY REMOVE that text from
that webpage, as we have never done such analysis in our Radiocarbon
laboratory. We are a serious research laboratory.

Tank you for the information,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

I'm withholding the person's name and position-don't want to cause unnecessary problems for innocent bystanders.

Fair enough.........

The blossom web page seems new (2012). Would there be a possibility that someone connected with the new blossom river group had these artefacts assessed by them prior to setting up new company "Blossom River group"? Therefore they would not know that the person that had them assessed was part of that group......legitimately saying they had them assessed? Possible, as they are stating they don't know the Blossom river group, not that they don't know the artefacts in question?

We are a serious research laboratory

Does that mean they have made up there mind these artefacts are a joke without actually assessing them??........seems strange to me? Very odd statement.

Originally posted by CaptainBeno
Would it be someone else that sent them there?

Aren't Blossom River group just the Auction house / sellers?

Now I'm confused?

You seem to be looking for excuses.

Well, they are real, but in which capacity you see it?

Sure, they’re real, insofar as there are rocks with carvings on them. But that doesn't mean they are authentic. Since the sellers havee been caught in TWO lies, it is looking very doubtful. The preponderance of evidence points to them be fakes.


For $75 big ones I don't think you are going to lie.

I’m curious...at what dollar amount will crooks stop lying to victims?

Could it be that the studies were done in private, not wanting to raise an alarm?

Except, Blossom River was not shy about saying who did the study, and claims to have the report. So it was not done in secret.

Also, now that the caretakers of the artifacts have been caught in TWO lies, will you apologize to the skeptically and critics you insulted and browbeat?

reply to post by WingedBull


No

I shall not.

More proof to come.

Insulted? Your definition of an insult is way off the mark. Get a grip.

It will all come out in the wash my friend.


and if your compiling a list of your/my favorite quotes.......don't bother......go and grab a beer and watch this space......try chilling out.

Originally posted by CaptainBeno
reply to post by WingedBull

 

No

I shall not.

More proof to come.

Insulted? Your definition of an insult is way off the mark. Get a grip.

It will all come out in the wash my friend.

edit on 27-2-2012 by CaptainBeno because: (no reason given)

and if your compiling a list of your/my favorite quotes.......don't bother......go and grab a beer and watch this space......try chilling out.

edit on 27-2-2012 by CaptainBeno because: (no reason given)

Why do you want to believe this so bad? it has been debunked twice by the lies armap and pauliegirl uncovered. Hey I am a believer too but you have to know when to cut your losses. I had my doubts from the beginning because if something is too good it will most likely be fake or snuffed out by tptb. Plus that Haramein has been debunked numerous times, just another reason to err on the side of caution.

reply to post by shamdaddy







UNFORTUNATELY for the 'scammers' plying their wares


* The believer's are not the one's with the $$$$$$'s

* And the unbeliever's who do have the $$$$$$'s are far to astute to be taken in

Nassim Haramein & Klaus Dona Ancient Stargate Artifacts, UFO's and..........


www.abovetopsecret.com...


HOAX??

reply to post by eletheia


Ok I get it, you're sceptical on these artifacts but your scepticism has now become desperation mate,. And just to add, they still haven't been proved as hoax artifacts

reply to post by Zcustosmorum


The only people appearing desperate are those who still insist these artifacts may be real. The preponderance ofevidence points to the rocks being fraudulent. We have seen...

-- a vague and inconsistant story

-- the sellers have been caughtin TWO lies about tests supposedly done on the objects

Thus far, there has been ZERO evidence to support the objects as being authentic.

reply to post by Zcustosmorum





Rather a sceptic than a fool.


They have been found out in two lies on this thread alone!

and on the other thead i linked to ATS member Pimander e.mailed Klaus Dona [who needless

to say never replied] states in his post "Klaus Dona and Nassim Haramein appear to ignore

anyone scrutinising their claims"


There are MANY large museums world wide who have the funds [$$$$$$$$$$'s] facilities and

QUALIFIED people with specialised knowledge who would be well qualified to authenticate the

artifacts!! So i am sure that IF they were 'the real deal' at least one of these museums would be

falling over themselves to have them ! So no need to put them on 'youtube' or to

solicit for sales on the internet.


I can't believe how desperate and needy some people are to 'believe' even when the odd's are

stacked against something being authentic therefor playing right into the hands of these

charlatans of the internet. They only need to put the words 'hidden' or 'forbidden' infront of

something [meaning they know something no one else knows] to have the 'beleivers' salavating

for more!

Originally posted by CaptainBeno
More proof to come.

More? How can you say more when not a single shred has not been produced supporting the claims or authenticity of the objects?

[Quote]
It will all come out in the wash my friend.

It certainly is, isn't it?

reply to post by WingedBull


Yawn

Originally posted by Pauligirl
Got an email back--UNAM denies doing any work for the Blossom River Group. They have sent an email asking to have their name removed from the page. That's two down. Does anybody still think this stuff is real?

not me. Too many holes now.

I'm standing on the fence post here, I'm merely saying that despite all the e-mails and apparent fraudulent testing done that these artifacts still remain non-hoaxed, so to speak.

Originally posted by Zcustosmorum
I'm standing on the fence post here, I'm merely saying that despite all the e-mails and apparent fraudulent testing done that these artifacts still remain non-hoaxed, so to speak.

edit on 28-2-2012 by Zcustosmorum because: (no reason given)

If the artifacts were real, why would they lie about the testing? I don't get it. Did they think/hope someone would shell out $75M without asking questions?

Hey CaptainBeno much respect for your persistance, I still think the artifacts are real until proven false. Don't mind te deniers and just focus on seeking out the truth!

Thanks all, Same as something smells fishy...........something smells right.

I'm sure it's a simple mistake on their behalf.

One would be a bit dodgy, but this amount.........

We are discovering new things all the time about our planet, it does not seem a month goes by without some new news about it. Even some news that totally blows other known theories out of the water......so, the jury is still out for me.

I'll keep looking

I believe.