Originally posted by neformore
When I said that links to files that download were not allowed. I meant it. They are against the T&C.
Further attempts to link to directly downloadable content will lead to this thread being closed.
Discuss it, but DO NOT link it.
Originally posted by smurfy
Just to point out, Net' has already pointed out the dangers of a direct link to torrent files, it's good advice. Stick to the wlstore index link now in the public domain, they are all pdf or jpg.
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by mr-lizard
This may be evidence that Asange may be related to Anon's work. I'd heard that they are big against Scientologyand this was their first target. I wouldn't be surprised if these two entities were working together.
Originally posted by DrNotforhire
reply to post by 0bserver1
hes stupid... and should be treated as a traitor..
Treason is the word id use
The makers of Wikileaks have called via Twitter to disseminate a comprehensive about 65 gigabytes large insurance file. She should land using BitTorrent technology on offer as many user computers to ensure the investigative platform operators. Because if something happens to them or Wikileaks being threatened in its existence, the password will be published to open the packet. Numerous unpublished documents are to be included. Their quality can only speculate. Wikileaks has published no genuine novelties for months. The whistleblower had ever distributed a file named insurance aes256 on the net, to protect themselves in the event of cases. It is unclear why there is a new archive called wikileaks-insurance-20120222.tar.bz2.aes right now. Maybe it has something to do that founder Julian Assange just before the highest court of Britain's fight against his extradition after Sweden. There he is accused rape. Assange fears to be delivered, which he himself has made with the release of secret documents to the enemy at the United States. Allegedly, one of the main Wikileaks whistleblower is American soldier, Bradley Manning, whose accused Swiss time before a military court at Fort Meade in the Federal State of Maryland is read today at 19: 00. The 24-year-olds is accused numerous secret US military documents on the wars in the Iraq and in Afghanistan and around 260 confidential dispatches of the US Department of State given ' 000 to Wikileaks to have. Due to support of the enemy, manning could be sentenced to lifelong imprisonment.
Originally posted by elmoastro
What if the money stream of donations started slipping? What would it take to get people opening up their wallets again?
What if you could fake an event or organization, the result of which led to millions of dollars pouring in? We've all seen the pictures of the wikileaks HQ high tech office setup. Why?
If your "enemies' have unlimited resources and your mission is exposing those enemies, wouldn't you keep a lower profile? They could have taken out Assange and killed wikileaks before people knew anything. Cui bono? Who benefits?
Financial support = compassion = sympathy = feelings & emotions
Influence feelings and emotions and you have your own personal ATM.
Flow slows down? Time for another "news" story.
Too many questions to fully buy the wikileaks drama.
In contrast, look at all of the high-level financial resignations going on currently. Why?
In the wikileaks case we have an event with no real repercussions. With the financial resigns, repercussions with no real event. WTF?