reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
It probably wouldn't hurt to put the OP into context and to compare the subject claims to the reality of modern contrail science and documented
analyses of contrail contents, formation and persistence.
(I've done this before when Matty was compelled to serially post junk and snippets as "proof" of imagined threats and motivations.)
First, the quoted passage was only part of a longer anonymous
rant posted in response to criticism of the recent follow-up to the
famously debunked WITWATS video.
Wow! Are You a paid government employee? Or simply an peron who is blinded. 24yrs in this mans military, I know what they are doing.
Operation Clover leaf is real! Not fantasy!! I have sample after sample of chemtrail material in My possession, We did not wait for it to
fall, We gathered it airborne, not terrestrially as others have done. I have seen from 50lb sacks to sealed 250lb pressurized cylinders with multiple
components involved. On the darpa sorties, "OTHER" material is added and those flights are highly classified and are generally completed at night so
as to prevent irradiation (solar) from sterilizing the compounds, since it's whole purpose is inhalation by the populace. You have no clue what Your
talking about! Or... You are indeed a government employee or contractor...NWO??!! Contrails do not release toxins & metals into the atmosphere and
eventually becoming part of the lower atmosphere and the air humans breath. Either way...the jig is up, the movement has gained tremendous momentum
and the truth (backed by science) is being purveyed towards the masses, which is eliciting a response in turn.
Second, a mere claim
to be in possession of "sample after sample" amounts to no evidence
without proper documentation and
analyses of said "samples." Anyone who jumps to the conclusion that this presents more "proof" of the "chemtrail" fables is engaged in more wishful
thinking of the sort that makes up the vast majority of prior offers of "proof" in this regard.
Third, the subject of the rant, the video follw-up entitled "the Great Culling," reveals that the "chemtrail" faithful and their major evangelists
have now settled upon the "population reduction" scenario as the rationale behind "chemtrails." The whole story, though, is that "chemtrails" are only
one facet of a global scheme to lace the air, food and vaccines with the seeds of mankind's destruction.
What Matty, the evangelists and the merely credulous ignore or forget is that contrails have been studied and sampled from the ground, air and
satellites for more than 40 years!
The various, non-governmental
studies and programs are readily available for review and consideration with a minimum of effort.
These programs and studies have gone by such acronyms and names as Subsonic Aircraft Contrail and Cloud Effects Special Study (SUCCESS), First
International Satellite Cloud Climatology Program Region Experiment (FIRE) Cirrus Intensive Field Observations (IFOs) II, Atmospheric Radiation
Measurement (ARM), MOZAIC, AIRS, CRYSTAL-FACE, and PARTEMIS.
As in the past, I dare the "chemtrail" faithful to look at any or all of these and then stand by their idiocracy with a straight face. Needless to
say, it has not happened yet.
These studies and analyses are not static. They continue apace.
Unlike the WITWATS and "Culling" money-driven fearmongering, all of these studies have been peer-reviewed and published in leading independent,
scientific journals, publications and literature.
Anyone intersted in serious analysis and stepping-stones to further inquiry should take a quick look at two of these in particluar, which have served
as compendia of sorts for more in-depth study:
In situ observations of contrail microphysics and implications for their radiative
ails and Contrail-Specific Microphysics
Tthis last studyincludes over 10 pages of citations and references as well as an index of contrail-specific analyses.
Of course, the "chemtrail" indoctrinated/faithful will make absolutely no effort to consider science and fact when they have propaganda as an antdote
edit on 12-2-2012 by jdub297 because: (no reason given)