It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by knoledgeispower
The only reason that same sex marriage is only legal in a very few states is thanks to the ignorant powers to be that are "old money". They are the ones that set everything in place and try to keep it that way to keep people dumbed down and pinned against one another.
Seriously, educate yourself. There is a reason you have a brain, think for yourself instead of being fed the same # your pathetic us gov shovels down your throat. There are tons of things that a majority of people believe to be true but that doesn't make it so nor does it make it right.
No, the reasons same sex marriage is not legal is because the MAJORITY of people agree with me.
You can continue to cry an whine and call me names OR you can accept the truth. I don't really care what you want to think about me. I know who I am. You're the confused one. You talk as if same sex marriage is already accepted and legal. When in all actuality it is not and it ill stay that way until people like you learn how to respect other peoples opinions. It's because of your lack of respect why you're so blind to your own disgraceful way of presenting your thoughts and opinions.
People like me learn to respect other peoples opinions, HA! I do not respect anyone who is ignorant and homophobic. You don't view homosexuals as human beings. You don't bother to educate yourself before you go spotting of non sense. You don't deserve respect because you do not respect an est. 707 million people on this earth.
You say that I can't accept the truth, that's because it is not the truth. You've been called out on your absurd, ludicrous, hypocritical, ignorant views, not just by me but by others, and you still refuse to see the truth and keep yourself dumbed down and uneducated.
edit on 14-2-2012 by MathiasAndrew because: (no reason given)
www.gallup.com...
"Do you think Homosexual relations between consenting adults should or should not be legal?"
Americans' support for legal gay relations has been as low as 32%, in 1986, but increased to 47% by 1989 and went above the majority level in 2001 for the first time. After peaking at 60% in May 2003, public support dropped that same year, likely as a backlash against a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down a Texas anti-sodomy law and gave gays and lesbians new legal protections in that state. By 2006, Americans returned to the more supportive level seen previously, and generally held there until the increase this year.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by Annee
reply to post by MrXYZ
Ya know what gets me?
These States Rights "people". If marriage rights are determined by states. What is DOMA?
It simply means they're selective when it comes to facts if those facts don't agree with their irrational beliefs...even at the cost of throwing human decency, morality, and ethics over board.
Luckily, times are changing and bigots like that are now the minority.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
The question they asked people was ......
www.gallup.com...
"Do you think Homosexual relations between consenting adults should or should not be legal?"
The question has nothing to do with "marriage"
www.gallup.com...
Americans' support for legal gay relations has been as low as 32%, in 1986, but increased to 47% by 1989 and went above the majority level in 2001 for the first time. After peaking at 60% in May 2003, public support dropped that same year, likely as a backlash against a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down a Texas anti-sodomy law and gave gays and lesbians new legal protections in that state. By 2006, Americans returned to the more supportive level seen previously, and generally held there until the increase this year.
In the same poll, Gallup also finds support for gay marriage increasing to the majority level for the first time.
You're the bigot here .....
Says the guy who equals gays with animals.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by MathiasAndrew
You're the bigot here .....
Says the guy who equals gays with animals...wow, the irony's strong in this one
"I DO NOT WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH MY DOG"
Just because you are OK with one and not the other doesn't change the fact that both of them are wrong to some people. Many people think that a marriage is between a man and a woman and that's how it should stay. Your opinion is no more valid than theirs or mine. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and as of this moment in the United States the majority agrees with me. Same sex marriage is only legal in a very few States.
METHODOLOGY – This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by telephone March 10-13, 2011, among a random national sample of 1,005 adults, including landline and cell-phone-only respondents. The results from the full survey have a 3.5-point error margin. The survey was produced for ABC News by Langer Research Associates of New York, with sampling, data collection and tabulation by TNS of Horsham, PA.
The poll has an insufficient sample size to evaluate
Because you THINK they are valid DOES NOT make them valid.
No, this creates a second class citizenry to have separate names. A rough analogy is bathrooms and drinking fountains for non-whites. Thats still a toilet and drinking fountain right?
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
reply to post by lordtyp0
No, this creates a second class citizenry to have separate names. A rough analogy is bathrooms and drinking fountains for non-whites. Thats still a toilet and drinking fountain right?
it is a pitiful analogy. the definition of marriage is between a man and a woman. if this is truly a fight over rights, then a civil union granting the same rights as a heterosexual marriage should appease you.
you aren't going to say "i have a civil union with my partner", you're going to say "we're married". yes, the difference is largely due to perception, but if this eases tensions between gays and straights while giving both the same benefits, then where is the problem?