Where's Your Space-Time?

Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by ButtUglyToad

 

That's where yew go astray! Source speaks Math! Ribbit

Well then it's easy.

So speak to us in the language of the "source".

(that's "math" in case you forgot)

Bring it. (bring it "source")

btw:

surprised you didn't say "ashtray" since I went to have a smoke..

I've been dew'n that butt yew ridicule the math as well, because closed mYnds C only what they want 2C.

Ribbit

reply to post by ButtUglyToad


Well...

When you say 2 + 3 = 23


Of course I question.

It is obviously 5.

Just use your hand.

reply to post by ButtUglyToad


you can't define nothing without defining something, and you can't define infinity without breaking 'it' into non-infinities. I like your take on the rule of threes.

chamberf=6, please go back a page and read the explaination I made about why your insistance that the answer is 5 is missing the point.

reply to post by whatsinaname


He just said he spoke in the language of the "source" ie. mathematics.

Originally posted by smyleegrl
Your thread makes me feel very, very stupid.

However, I have one point to make. Your assuming that the law of matter is correct. I know that recent work in quantum physics has unconvered that certain "fundamental" laws of physics are now in question. I just read an article (I think on discovery.com but I'm not positive) that stated Einstein's speed of light, assumed to be a constant, in fact may be fluctuating.

Any way to break down your overall post into language for dummies? What do you mean when you mention space-time for numbers?

Sure the speed of light is fluctuating nothing is truly constant, and nothing is truly eternal.

*sigh* I was hoping this wouldn't come to heavy math to explain -_-

basically the hypothesis is that numbers -are- space-time, skipping the definition of the latter else i'll be here for days..

numbers define everything we experience, shape, intensity, physical laws (V=IR ?) the universe itself.

so why does 3 and 1 and 1 equal 23? because you just removed the commonly accepted laws of math, laws which have paradoxes, laws which infact are theory that has been fluked ever so well for a long time. decimal for example can be used to define scale, though most think of it as repeating tens, forgetting that your actually defining a bunch of ones.

obviously in normal math the proper marking for two and three is 2 + 3, not 23, but a programmer might see 23 as a string rather than a number.

I hope this hints at what im getting at, if not try to make sense of this en.wikipedia.org... , and re-read my previous posts, im not trying to confuse you but there are such things as 1 = 0 in regular math aswell..

ed: im trying to not have to explain how positive zero negative combination varients literally are how logic function works but if I must I shall return. srsly, it kills my brain to graph it all...>_>

Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by ButtUglyToad

 

Well...

When you say 2 + 3 = 23


Of course I question.

It is obviously 5.

Just use your hand.

whY use mY hand when eYe can use Spock's instead:



Let's see. TWO on the Left and THREE on the Right = 23

"kNot even God can win the argument against Stoopidity, when Stoopid is judging the Contest." - Old Toad Proverb

"U can't teach sum1 sumthing they already know." - Old Toad Proverb

Ribbit

reply to post by ButtUglyToad

"kNot even God can win the argument against Stoopidity, when Stoopid is judging the Contest." - Old Toad Proverb "U can't teach sum1 sumthing they already know." - Old Toad Proverb Ribbit

Are you really trying to be serious, or just trying to have a laugh??

Originally posted by andersensrm

Originally posted by smyleegrl
Your thread makes me feel very, very stupid.

However, I have one point to make. Your assuming that the law of matter is correct. I know that recent work in quantum physics has unconvered that certain "fundamental" laws of physics are now in question. I just read an article (I think on discovery.com but I'm not positive) that stated Einstein's speed of light, assumed to be a constant, in fact may be fluctuating.

Any way to break down your overall post into language for dummies? What do you mean when you mention space-time for numbers?

Sure the speed of light is fluctuating nothing is truly constant, and nothing is truly eternal.

Time IS the Absolute Constant by which All is defined!

But remember, your measurement of Time, is kNot Time, it is only the measurement of IT.

You know kNot Time because you've had One of the Three connections to IT blocked.

2 of 3 = 66.6% = 666

EveryOne bears the Mark, but you can't see it, because IT is within you!

Ribbit

Originally posted by ButtUglyToad

Originally posted by andersensrm

Originally posted by smyleegrl
Your thread makes me feel very, very stupid.

However, I have one point to make. Your assuming that the law of matter is correct. I know that recent work in quantum physics has unconvered that certain "fundamental" laws of physics are now in question. I just read an article (I think on discovery.com but I'm not positive) that stated Einstein's speed of light, assumed to be a constant, in fact may be fluctuating.

Any way to break down your overall post into language for dummies? What do you mean when you mention space-time for numbers?

Sure the speed of light is fluctuating nothing is truly constant, and nothing is truly eternal.

Time IS the Absolute Constant by which All is defined!

But remember, your measurement of Time, is kNot Time, it is only the measurement of IT.

You know kNot Time because you've had One of the Three connections to IT blocked.

2 of 3 = 66.6% = 666

EveryOne bears the Mark, but you can't see it, because IT is within you!

Ribbit

...And yet you have been saying 2+3 =23.


How does that connect to 666??

Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by ButtUglyToad

 

"kNot even God can win the argument against Stoopidity, when Stoopid is judging the Contest." - Old Toad Proverb "U can't teach sum1 sumthing they already know." - Old Toad Proverb Ribbit

Are you really trying to be serious, or just trying to have a laugh??

Ever hear of Shakespeare? A Tragic Comedy?

Contradictions!

Yew are a Contradiction but refuse to C IT.

Ribbit

Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by ButtUglyToad

 

Well...

When you say 2 + 3 = 23

There was a special ed kid in school that did that.

Of course I question.

It is obviously 5.

If the "+" operator is overloaded and used as a string concatenator, it's definitely "23".

Just use your hand.

Oh dear!

reply to post by Chamberf=6


two thirds is 66.6%

pure math, abstraction, goog*strikethrough* search engine these terms.

ed: I get the feeling no one is infact following either the links or reserarching the things of which I speak so I guess i'll just wait til someone other than toad man and I get it.

Originally posted by Chamberf=6

Originally posted by ButtUglyToad

Originally posted by andersensrm

Originally posted by smyleegrl
Your thread makes me feel very, very stupid.

However, I have one point to make. Your assuming that the law of matter is correct. I know that recent work in quantum physics has unconvered that certain "fundamental" laws of physics are now in question. I just read an article (I think on discovery.com but I'm not positive) that stated Einstein's speed of light, assumed to be a constant, in fact may be fluctuating.

Any way to break down your overall post into language for dummies? What do you mean when you mention space-time for numbers?

Sure the speed of light is fluctuating nothing is truly constant, and nothing is truly eternal.

Time IS the Absolute Constant by which All is defined!

But remember, your measurement of Time, is kNot Time, it is only the measurement of IT.

You know kNot Time because you've had One of the Three connections to IT blocked.

2 of 3 = 66.6% = 666

EveryOne bears the Mark, but you can't see it, because IT is within you!

Ribbit

...And yet you have been saying 2+3 =23.


How does that connect to 666??

Yew already answered IT!

2 of 3 = 66.6% = 666
2 of 3 = 23

Sew yew just realized EVERYTHING ties INTO the Number 23.

Yew must be taking yew'r smart pills now.

Ribbit

Originally posted by The1Prettiest1One

Originally posted by Chamberf=6

Just use your hand.

Oh dear!

eYe's think Cham's don't want eYe to Replicate!

Ribbit

reply to post by ButtUglyToad

2 of 3

Is much different (even you must concede) than the 2+3 you originally gave.


(in your? language ...ribbit?)

Sew yew just realized EVERYTHING ties INTO the Number 23.

When you change the rule every step, I guess whatever you want to be... is whatever you want.

It's not the law of 23, it's the law of fives:

The Law of Fives states simply that: ALL THINGS HAPPEN IN FIVES, OR ARE DIVISIBLE BY OR ARE MULTIPLES OF FIVE, OR ARE SOMEHOW DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY APPROPRIATE TO 5.

The Law of Fives is never wrong(also, never cabbage).

Source

reply to post by The1Prettiest1One

never cabbage).

Much of the world would disagree.

Originally posted by The1Prettiest1One
It's not the law of 23, it's the law of fives:

The Law of Fives states simply that: ALL THINGS HAPPEN IN FIVES, OR ARE DIVISIBLE BY OR ARE MULTIPLES OF FIVE, OR ARE SOMEHOW DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY APPROPRIATE TO 5.

The Law of Fives is never wrong(also, never cabbage).

Source

You could say the same thing about any number, Im not sure where all of you are trying to get at.

Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by The1Prettiest1One

 

never cabbage).

Much of the world would disagree.

Take it up with another pope! I always was a dissenter on that point.