Romney: "I'm Not Concerned About the Very Poor", page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 73 times


reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 11:25 AM by Liquesence
reply to post by Wildbob77



It's "republican bashing" to call someone out, running for president, who says that he does not care about the poor?

He should have just kept his mouth shut.

edit on 1-2-2012 by Liquesence because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 11:25 AM by DrNotforhire
reply to post by Question Fate



we live in AMERICA, this is the place where you should be able to make whatever you want to without being criticized for it...

America is a bunch of haters right now... its not a good look



reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 11:33 AM by Liquesence
Originally posted by DrNotforhire
reply to
post by Liquesence



yes completely out of context of your original post...

he said hes not worried about it because its not a problem.. I AGREE with him on that... considering RIGHT NOW if you live in california you make more money on the Government dollar than you do getting a real job.....

I think that system is fine.


It's not a problem for him because they represent a very small electorate, compare to the middle class he is catering to, telling them what they want to hear to get elected.

As far as out of context, i think the OP is not out of context: quoting "i am not concerned about the very poor because they have a safety net," is pretty in context, even though perhaps a clarification--a clarification which does not make any better the statement that 'i do not care about the very poor'--would add nothing to the statement.

The system is fine? Wow. The poor can barely get out of the rut they are in, these days, because the American dream is dwindling because of corporation and people like "fire-people" Romney.

And that system is fine, or is it because they get *some* government assistance?


reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 11:39 AM by DrNotforhire
reply to post by Liquesence



3 generations of knowing how to manipulate a system doesn't think its the poor thats the problem

it makes me think the people on the system are the problem


reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 11:45 AM by Ladysophiaofsandoz
reply to post by ping9



Before everything feel apart my husband and I would sometimes work 50-60 hours a week. I got an education the only thing its doing for me these days is making me over qualified for the crappy jobs I am willing to take but cant get hired for because I am over educated and over qualified. The only work we have been able to find is temporary work, paying sometimes $10 or more, less than I used to make. I am willing to and have tried to go to some of the day labor places to even dig ditches to pay the bills but there are too many "qualified" people and not enough work.

Politicians will spend trillions of dollars getting elected this year. Really think they care about anyone but their big contributors? Politicians no matter what party have been bought and sold before they ever get elected. I have no illusions that ANY of the candidates running care about me or anyone like me. The whole thing is a sick sad joke.


reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 11:57 AM by Blackmarketeer
Why this comment from Romeny should piss you off:

While he is saying "I'm Not Concerned About the Very Poor, they have a safety net" (yeah, food stamps), his cohorts on Wall Street are throwing themselves a wild bacchanal, partying to their fortune and mocking the dirty, grubby, poor people.

Inside the Bacchanalian Wall Street Fraternity Party of Billionaire Bankers and Hedge Fund Predators

The whole affair’s reminiscent of the wingdings the robber barons used to throw during America’s own Gilded Age a century and a half ago, when great wealth amassed at the top, far from the squalor and misery of working stiffs.


This is who Mitt Romney is; a corporate raider who extracted his wealth on the backs of the working poor, driving good companies out of business with leveraged buyouts.

The GOP is so out of touch with reality.


reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 11:58 AM by DrNotforhire
reply to post by Blackmarketeer



it doesn't though... i'd rather have that thought line than the "re-distribution of wealth" that we currently have


reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 11:59 AM by fltcui
I'm a Ron Paul supporter not a Romney supporter but I have to agree with this statement. The poor do have safety nets in place that the working middle class doesn't have.
Can you afford to go to Disney World or Sea World? People on Welfare can. Our local news station here in St. Louis found that Missouri welfare dollars are being withdrawn at places like Sea World and Magical Midway Amusement park in Orlando, Fl. That is totally wrong!!!! See link below for the story.
www.kmov.com...

Romney also puts his money where his mouth is. If you look at his 2010 Tax Return you'll see that he gave
$2,983,984 to Charity in 2010. That's almost 15% of his income. Do you give 15% of your income to charity?
mittromney.com...

Like I said I'm not a Romney supporter but I believe his focus on the middle class is right.
The Middle class pays the majority of income taxes and without the middle class, there will be no tax dollars to give the poor people and then they'll be in trouble


reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 12:06 PM by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by fltcui



Yeah but being "very poor" should be out of the question if you are an American. America shouldn't have a category of being very poor to begin with. It should just be middle class, and wealthy. How we ended up with very poor people is something to think about.


reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 12:09 PM by DrNotforhire
reply to post by fltcui



yeah I completely agree

In California.. up to about 5 months ago you were allowed to take welfare money out at the casino ATMS


reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 12:11 PM by Blackmarketeer
reply to post by DrNotforhire



I wonder if you realize Obama is more conservative than the late great Ronald Reagan? That conservatives must be apoplectic over how Obama implemented most of their ideas better than they have?

I pay 29% in taxes. I earn a fraction of what Romney does. In 2010 he paid 13.9% in taxes.

In 2009 and possibly in 2008, he may have paid ZERO in taxes.

It's wealth distribution alright, from the 99% straight into the pockets of the 1%. We are living in the new gilded age of the robber barons, and they are partying hard on Wall Street.

Mitt’s Income vs. Your Income
Give this a try, it took me a year to earn what Mittens earned in day, and I don't get any of the special tax breaks he does. Mitt earns in 5 hours what a person working minimum wage earns in a year. But don't worry about those minimum wage earners, they have that safety net, LOL.


reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 12:13 PM by DrNotforhire
reply to post by Blackmarketeer



Good for him for earning money...

I applaud the capitalist mentality.... I'm not jealous AT ALL.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul is NOT dropping out, the Mainstream Media is LYING.
  Posted 15 days ago with 111 member flags
Report: Romney Will Be Disqualified From Race Due To Fraud
  Posted 19 days ago with 105 member flags
Evidence of Vote Flipping in GOP Primary Elections
  Posted 7 days ago with 88 member flags
Fox News Analyst: First American to shoot down drone will be a hero
  Posted 14 days ago with 68 member flags
Mitt Romney scared Ron Paul is winning!!!
  Posted 7 days ago with 62 member flags
Let\'s just say it: Political Parties are the Problem
  Posted 12 days ago with 60 member flags