It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Prohibits the Secretary of the Treasury from implementing a proposed revenue procedure entitled, "Proposed Revenue Procedure on Private Tax-Exempt Schools," or any other guidelines for determining whether private schools have forfeited their tax-exempt status through the adoption of racially discriminatory policies.
Iranian Student Expulsion Act - Prohibits the making available of funds, authorized under any program to aid higher education, to any institution that enrolls or has enrolled on the date of enactment of this Act any person who is not a citizen of the United States and whose country of origin or residence immediately prior to entry into the United States is Iran.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Classic Ron Paul circle jerk thread.
Racist support him because he is into things like segregation. Seems no one on this site has ever checked out the legislation that he has sponsored. Some fans you are...
At Big Government, Andrew Breitbart reports that, as a presidential candidate in March 2007, then-Senator Barack Obama appeared and marched with members of the New Black Panther Party. Included in Obama’s Panther entourage was Malik Zulu Shabazz, the racist group’s “national chief.” Shabazz was one of the Panthers charged in the voter intimidation case that the Obama/Holder Justice Department dismissed in 2009 — even though the government had already won the case (the Panthers defaulted) and the evidence supporting the civil charges was overwhelming.
This is a shocking story, and a breathtaking indictment of the mainstream media which went out of its way to avoid vetting Obama as a candidate — and to make sure anyone who tried to do due diligence got no sunshine. A candidate who chose to appeared in the company of, say, the KKK, would have provoked relentlessly hostile media coverage and, in short order, have been marginalized as disqualified to hold responsible elective office.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by SpaDe_
Changing topics to Obama? Classic Paulians!
Denying that all parties have unfavorable and sometimes racist followers... PURE IGNORANCE! Ron Paul has not been publicly seen or documented with any racist groups. Can you say that about Obama? No sir you cannot. Pot meet Kettle.
H.R.4982: A bill to provide for civil rights in public schools.
SUMMARY AS OF: 2/29/1984--Introduced. Public School Civil Rights Act of 1984 - Eliminates inferior Federal court jurisdiction to issue any order requiring the assignment or transportation of students to public schools on the basis of race, color, or national origin. Permits individuals and school boards to seek relief from court orders made prior to this Act unless the court makes certain findings, including: (1) that the acts giving rise to the order intentionally and specifically caused the segregation; (2) that no other remedy would work; and (3) that the benefits of the order outweigh its economic, social, and educational costs. Lists remedies which remain available for unconstitutional segregation.
This "champion of peace" wanted to prohibit the dismantling of ICBM silos in the U.S.:
He has promoted the Bricker Amendment to the Constitution, and otherwise sought limit the protections of international law. He would also prohibit U.S. courts from citing foreign laws or policies (other than English ones) in their decisions:
A resolution proposing the Bricker amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to force and effect of treaties and executive agreements.
Constitutional Amendment - Provides that a treaty which denies or abridges any right enumerated in the Constitution shall not be of any force or effect. States that no treaty shall authorize or permit any foreign power or any international organization to supervise, control, or adjudicate any matter essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of the United States. Provides that a treaty shall become effective as internal law in the United States only through the enactment of appropriate legislation by the Congress.
These so called "segregation academies" first came under the scrutiny of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in 1967, at which time it was announced that racially discriminatory private schools, receiving direct state aid, were not entitled to tax exempt status under the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). 16 In 1971, in response to a court challenge, the IRS ruled that this policy applied to private schools whether or not state supported; 17 to qualify for favorable tax status, private schools were required to adopt a racially nondiscriminatory admissions policy. 18 In 1975, the IRS made clear that this requirement applied to church-related and church-operated schools as well as to private nonsectarian schools. 1
Spokesmen for religious schools raised questions concerning governmental neutrality toward religion, encouragement of state-preferred religious beliefs, possible excessive governmental entanglement with religion and potential infringement of the free exercise of religion. 26 The issues raised by most, if not all of the opposition, did not concern the right of racially discriminatory schools to retain tax exemptions, but concerned the method by which the IRS sought to implement its policy and the fear of the future consequences of that implementation. 27
The procedure is directed to two classifications of schools, those adjudicated to be discriminatory and those found to be reviewable.
Did you read the legislation before deciding you didn't like it? Here is one example where if you read it the blurb on the blog sounds worse than it really is.
So, somehow believing in maintaining defensive strength means you aren't for peace? That makes absolutely no sense. It is a logical fallacy to believe a peaceful person can not also believe in the need for defense.
Anybody that believes in the constitution and the freedoms protected by it must be evil and crazy.
put the blog summary and the LBoC summary up. I will be more than happy to discuss it. I'm always open to new points of view.
To prohibit the Federal Government from planning, developing, implementing, or administering any national teacher test or method of certification and from withholding funds from States or local educational agencies that fail to adopt a specific method of teacher certification.
Originally posted by pierregustavetoutant
That is where they are going to try an destroy Paul's credibility.
Frankly I don't care if racists support him. If those votes help him get elected, so be it. Lots of racists supported Obama, too.
The only reason I can think of Silo's as being a defensive weapon is for... shooting down missiles with other missiles. Silo's(well, the missiles that come out) are a straight attack weapon.
Thats the problem. He doesn't believe in constitution. He worships it. It is his only argument for anything. I find this incredibly weak.
I found this one a bit odd. Since the links to this page dont work, you are going to have to look for it in the page itself.
Many States are implementing a rigorous framework for preparing, certifying, and recognizing the professional growth of educators.
Having the Federal Government require States, local governments, or local educational agencies to engage in any type of teacher testing or certification requires Federal oversight of what knowledge is necessary to be a teacher.
Originally posted by stirling
As if being posed by some die hard fanatic grasping for straws which support his twist on reality.
Ron Paul is the biggest breath of freash air