It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
I would like this question answered from all the Paulites.
What makes you think Ron Paul can do all the things he said? What makes you think he ISN"T a corrupt politician? What makes you think he is sooo much better than Romney or Newt? Ok that's like three questions.
Newt and Romney will get the nomination. This is already final! Just look at how paul is doing in the polls, not opinions, factual polls. Third place iowa, third place SC, fourth place florida. The man is a loser and all of you sticking with him this time around will be very disappointed when he doesn't win this time. Why stick with a loosing team? Are Herman Cain's followers still writing him in? well maybe about 50 people. Ron Paul is too extreme, as in not normal GOP.
Again, this thread is about newt or mitt because that's what it will come down to. I'm calling it now!
Originally posted by jjf3rd77
I would like this question answered from all the Paulites.
What makes you think Ron Paul can do all the things he said?
What makes you think he ISN"T a corrupt politician?
Newt and Romney will get the nomination.
funny how you don't mention 2nd in New Hampshire..
This is already final! Just look at how paul is doing in the polls, not opinions, factual polls. Third place iowa, third place SC, fourth place florida.
The man is a loser and all of you sticking with him this time around will be very disappointed when he doesn't win this time. Why stick with a loosing team?
Ron Paul is too extreme, as in not normal GOP.
Again, this thread is about newt or mitt because that's what it will come down to. I'm calling it now!
Originally posted by MrDesolate
Newt's a Washington insider. Mitt isn't. Mitt has accomplishments way above and beyond politics. Newt doesn't. Mitt is a decent (maybe too decent, according to some ) guy, and loyal family man. Newt is a bludgeoning tyrant and serial adulterer, which makes him completely untrustworthy in my opinion.
Now, I'd vote for either of them over Obama, but I'd prefer Mitt if he and Newt are the two choices.
Both Harvard guys, as is Obama. At least there's no Skull and Bones guy in the race at this point.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Eurisko2012
Ya, I wouldn't bet on it either! His chances are obviously slim to none. It looks like Newt is going to win Florida.
Several months ago, I laid out this scenario. I said TPTB, and the shot-callers want Obama in office, and if they can't have that, they want another puppet. They put up Romney and Perry as those puppets, and they hyped the hell out of them. Newt was in the game, as a sleeper, he was the company man, and the Plan B if they needed him, but he served as comic relief for awhile. He was making quips, engaging the crowd, attacking the debate moderators, and giving Romney and Perry their time to shine.
So, what happened? Perry bombed out quick, and Cain, Paul, Bachmann, Huntsman were pulling too many voters. So they crushed Cain, Bachmann dropped out, Huntsman is surely lobbying for a Sec of State position, so he dropped and endorsed Romney, but even after all of that Romney was still struggling, so NEWT EMERGES! Like a Phoenix! Newt suddenly surges in the polls, gets all the press coverage, starts taking the debates seriously, and steals the limelight.
From the start, it was going to be Obama, Romney, or Perry, with Newt as their Plan B!
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Eurisko2012
Ya, that is the part that puzzles me. Romney and Newt are being awfully heated with one another, and that doesn't support my puppet theory very well! But, it does help Obama a whole lot, and I believe he is the chosen one, so perhaps TPTB are just letting them slug it out?
What I don't understand, is why this doesn't all benefit Paul more? I know he isn't as engaging as the others, and I know his message is sometimes lost when he fumbles for words, but he still has the best overall platform on the stage to benefit the common person, so why are we so impressionable to be shuffled from pillar to post as Newt and Romney trade blows? Why not just unhitch and walk on over to Paul?
Originally posted by marinesniper0351
Newt G, so much more intelligent and entertaining to watch him speak and he seems like a bull dog with THICK SKIN... : )
Originally posted by getreadyalready
And you are comparing them like there is some difference? Does it really matter which of these 3 get elected? Will there be any significant change?
This is precisely the reason Ron Paul is the only answer.
Is it so unreasonable to try to have a discussion about the other options without dragging Paul into it? Just one? I know it's way too late for this thread, and I'm confident the answer is "no", so consider it a rhetorical question to be considered without responding to it.