It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I am sick and tird of defending this thread.
Did you read this: speculative????
And i am going to say it, all you smartasses (no disrespectman) who come here to give a science lesson are mistaken, i happen to know more about science then you.
So what would it mean to you if the wind was alive?
This forum is dedicated to the all-important highly speculative topics that may not be substantiated by many, if any facts and span the spectrum of topics discussed on ATS. Readers and users should be aware that extreme theories without corroboration are embraced in this forum. Discussion topics and follow-up responses in this forum will likely tend to lean in favor of conspiracies, scandals, and cover-ups. Members who would seek to refute such theories should be mindful of AboveTopSecret.com's tradition of focusing on conspiracy theory, cover-ups, and scandals.
Not one of you "KNOW"......anything....you delve into your "Wikipedia's", urgently crunching through other peoples work, then regurgitate what you have gleaned and claim to have a learned opinion, never seeing that all you delve in is supposition................You have no....KNOWLEDGE...you plaigerize and "borrow" other peoples critical thinking and claim it as your own...as if YOU had made the effort...
The OP has provided a speculative question that none of you can disprove....You can point to all the Earth science data you want, to all the "peer" reviewed journals, that exist with chart and graph and never once approach knowledge....
You seem to think that because you read somewhere that "X" was thus "Y" that, that you had somehow gained Gnosis...NONE of you have KNOWLEDGE, you only opine. You should perhaps realize that your lack of critical thinking skills have blinded you to your own ignorance, so you pick up another's thought process and hearald it as your own, then you call the OP ignorant.
OP.......Pneuma...or breath "according to Judaic tradition" caused life to animate the inanimate.....Was it the air that was moved by the breath, or was it some other energy or effect carried by, infused within, or riding upon that "wind" of breath. As to wether that "breath of God", initiated life or was alive, I cannot say.......You see, I am not privy to all of "knowing"...or to any of it. I am however, intelligent enough and honest enough to admit that all that I "think" I know is in fact only me "thinking", that I know.
Originally posted by banishedfromthisarea
I put on my running shoes and stepped outside in the cool evening air here in Florida. I started jogging slowly down my dirt road, the wind gently caressing my face. My dog beside me, as wisps of tiny water droplets from every breath float away from him. I speed up, now running. My heart begins to race and I feel warmth coming to my skin where the cool wind takes it away. I breath in deep - it feels good to take in the wind deep into me. My lungs expand and the air seemlessly passes into my being, into the very cells of my body. The air now circulates throughout my body, mind and soul - joining with the other elements that are me - carbon, hydrogen, iron, calcium and potassium. I have given life to the very air that I breathe. Who gave life to me?
Originally posted by BBalazs
Originally posted by UltraDOSEcious
So is the wind one very large organism, covering the entire planet, or is every little gust an individual?
Please stop calling this a "theory." This is NOT a theory, and since it is not testable, I wouldn't even call it a hypothesis. This is metaphysical discussion, and while it is worth talking about to help think outside the box, it has no bearing on physical reality.
You are know going to show your arrogance and misunderstanding of speculation?
Gaia theory, check it out.
Theory is speculation my half witted friend (since sou are unaware of what words mean).
Here is the definition, enjoy:
The English word theory was derived from a technical term in Ancient Greek philosophy. The word theoria, θεωρία, meant "a looking at, viewing, beholding", and referring to contemplation or speculation, as opposed to action. Theory is especially often contrasted to "practice" (from Greek praxis, πρᾶξις) a Greek term for "doing", which is opposed to theory because theory involved no doing apart from itself.
Ps: dont tell menwhat i can or cannot do, or i will also start telling sou what sour family can and cannot do.
Originally posted by Starchild23
I will repeat: this thread is without true meaning, so long as the OP refuses to answer the question he/she poses. if you are unable to answer the question you have offered, then why do you ask us to answer it WITHOUT answering it? It is truly illogical....
Note: I am drunk as I answer this, but it still makes sense...do not ask us to answer your question, then berate us for answering it scientifically without offering an answer of you own. It is not justified. So shut up, and answer us with your own theory, or leave us alone.
That is all I ask.edit on CSundaypm292934f34America/Chicago22 by Starchild23 because: (no reason given)